13.08.2013 Views

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

X <strong>Olmsted</strong> Family <strong>Genealogy</strong><br />

THE RESULT OF THE SEARCH FOR THE ANCESTORS OF JAMES<br />

OLMSTED, SET ON FOOT BY FREDERICK LAW OLMSTED*<br />

Mr. Briggs <strong>of</strong> London was employed <strong>in</strong> 1890 to search all available<br />

records <strong>in</strong> order to ascerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> birthplace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong>s who<br />

came to New England <strong>in</strong> 1632. They were members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rev. Thomas<br />

Hooker's congregation, commonly known as <strong>the</strong> Bra<strong>in</strong>tree Colony, which<br />

fact po<strong>in</strong>ted to County Essex. The dist<strong>in</strong>guished genealogist, Mr. Henry M.<br />

Waters, most k<strong>in</strong>dly gave Mr. Briggs a copy <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> two parish registers,<br />

one <strong>of</strong> Fairsted, County Essex, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Great Leighs, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

county. The Fairsted register, given below, proved to conta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children <strong>of</strong> one James <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burials<br />

<strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> his children, and <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> his wife, Joyce. This, without any<br />

doubt, is <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> James <strong>Olmsted</strong> who emigrated to<br />

New England <strong>in</strong> 1632. Mr. Waters also found, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g parish <strong>of</strong><br />

Great Leighs, <strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong> one James <strong>Olmsted</strong>, who married <strong>in</strong> 1576 Jane<br />

Bristow, and had baptized <strong>in</strong> that parish eleven children. The second son,<br />

Richard, was baptized 22d March, 1578-9. James, <strong>the</strong> third son, was baptized<br />

4th December, 1580, and married 26th October, 1605, Joyce Cornish.<br />

In Great Leighs two <strong>of</strong> his children were baptized and <strong>in</strong> Fairsted <strong>the</strong> five<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Mr. Briggs searched <strong>in</strong> Somerset House for all <strong>the</strong> wills under <strong>the</strong> name<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> and found among a great number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs that <strong>of</strong> James, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong> James <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>the</strong> emigrant, and grandfa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Richard, John and Rebecca,<br />

and <strong>of</strong> Nicholas and Nehemiah—all <strong>of</strong> whom came to New England<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Lyon " <strong>in</strong> 1632.<br />

He <strong>the</strong>n proceeded to search <strong>the</strong> Subsidy Rolls. He found that James<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong> who married Jane Bristow had belonged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighbor<strong>in</strong>g parish<br />

<strong>of</strong> Great Waltham, and that his fa<strong>the</strong>r, James, had married <strong>the</strong>re one Alice<br />

(<strong>family</strong> name not found, but presumably ei<strong>the</strong>r Hawkyns or Sorell). The<br />

fourth payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsidy (due 3d year Edward VI.) was not collected<br />

till <strong>the</strong> 6th year <strong>of</strong> Edward VI. (1552-3) and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> return <strong>the</strong>n made " <strong>the</strong><br />

widowe Holmestede " is found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parish <strong>of</strong> Great Waltham " <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> place<br />

<strong>of</strong> James," show<strong>in</strong>g pla<strong>in</strong>ly that he had died <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval between 1550<br />

and 1553. It seems to be proved that James and Alice were <strong>the</strong> parents<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> James who lived at Great Leighs, and died <strong>in</strong> 1595, and grandparents<br />

<strong>of</strong> James, <strong>the</strong> emigrant. The Sorells and Hawkynses mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> will<br />

<strong>of</strong> " Als," below, both lived near James <strong>in</strong> Great Waltham. While <strong>the</strong> name<br />

<strong>of</strong> William <strong>Olmsted</strong> is met with <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rolls as own<strong>in</strong>g lands <strong>in</strong> Felsted, thus<br />

confirm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> statement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Harleian MSS., No. 6071, f. 319, British<br />

Museum (given herewith) that <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong>, whose orig<strong>in</strong>al seat was<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong> Hall, County Essex, had a branch established <strong>in</strong> Felsted. All <strong>the</strong><br />

above mentioned parishes are very near toge<strong>the</strong>r. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property<br />

was freehold and some leasehold. Far<strong>the</strong>r back than James— ^born probably<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1520—it has not been possible to go with certa<strong>in</strong>tyt but <strong>the</strong>re is every<br />

probability that James, born <strong>in</strong> 1520, descended from one Richard Olmestede<br />

*Toward thd expenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search, runn<strong>in</strong>g over many years before Mr. Waters<br />

set us right, Vice-President Marl<strong>in</strong> E. <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Philadelphia, contributed $25, Rt.<br />

Rev. Charles T <strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Utica, $10, and Mrs. Kate O. Beebe, a daughter <strong>of</strong> John<br />

<strong>Olmsted</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, $10.<br />

tThere is mention <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rolls <strong>of</strong> one James <strong>Olmsted</strong>, at Bra<strong>in</strong>tree, and Beatrice,<br />

his wife, who may have been <strong>the</strong> parents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> James who married Alice.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!