13.08.2013 Views

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

Genealogy of the Olmsted family in America : embracing the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

EXPLANATORY<br />

The reference system adopted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genealogy</strong> s <strong>the</strong> simplest that<br />

has been found practicable, viz., <strong>the</strong> designation <strong>of</strong> each name by a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

number, strictly adhered to throughout. The <strong>in</strong>quirer has only to turn to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex, f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page upon which <strong>the</strong> desired name occurs,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n trace it out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work. Where <strong>the</strong> name represents<br />

<strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> a <strong>family</strong>, marked +, <strong>the</strong> facts regard<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>family</strong> will be found<br />

upon a subsequent page under <strong>the</strong> same name <strong>in</strong> brackets.<br />

THE ORTHOGRAPHY OF THE FAMILY NAME<br />

It will be noted that with a few exceptions <strong>the</strong> famUy name is spelled<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> volume, " <strong>Olmsted</strong>." This method is observed for <strong>the</strong> sake<br />

<strong>of</strong> uniformity, and follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> custom generally approved by genealogists,<br />

i. e., <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> name as most commonly spelled by descendants, as <strong>the</strong> estab-<br />

lished name <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Genealogy</strong>. The compiler makes haste, however, to<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> that <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>stances his correspondents <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> " a " <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1 ast syllable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> name and a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se favor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> orthography to<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y are accustomed have written to ask why <strong>the</strong> " <strong>Olmsted</strong> " form is <strong>in</strong>variably<br />

used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> volume. As suggested above, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two forms<br />

would create confusion and mar <strong>the</strong> symmetry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> record. A similar<br />

situation obta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> orthography <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>family</strong> names. The name<br />

" Osborn," which is <strong>the</strong> one used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Osborn <strong>Genealogy</strong>, is also spelled^<br />

Osborne and Osburn. The name Reed is also spelled Reid, Read and Reade.<br />

In both <strong>the</strong> above cases, <strong>the</strong> bearers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> name were no doubt orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>family</strong>. A great many o<strong>the</strong>r similar cases might be noticed,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y will undoubtedly occur at once to <strong>the</strong> reader, so <strong>the</strong>y are not here<br />

mentioned. As to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Olmsted</strong> name, it appears under a great many different<br />

forms both <strong>in</strong> this country and abroad, as witness <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g: Almesteda,<br />

Elmsted, Elmstead, Hamstead, Hampstead, Hampstede, Hamsted, Hempsted,<br />

Hempstede, Holmestead, Holmested, Holmestede, Holmstead, Holmsteade,<br />

Holmsted, Holmstedd, Holmystede, Homestead, Hompstead, Hompsted,<br />

Hompstede, Hownsted, Olmested, Olmestede, <strong>Olmsted</strong>, Olmstead,<br />

Olmsteed, <strong>Olmsted</strong>d, Ownsted, Umsted, Umstede.<br />

The compiler disavows <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tention even to suggest any change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

method <strong>of</strong> spell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> name to which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual descendants are accustomed.<br />

THE FIRST MENTION OF THE FAMILY NAME<br />

The earliest mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>family</strong> name occurs <strong>in</strong> "Doomsday Book" for<br />

<strong>the</strong> County <strong>of</strong> Essex, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey made under William <strong>the</strong> Conqueror, <strong>in</strong><br />

1086. It appears as follows under "The Land <strong>of</strong> Suen <strong>of</strong> Essex" and <strong>the</strong><br />

"Hundret <strong>of</strong> Tendr<strong>in</strong>ge":<br />

"Almesteda (Elmsted or <strong>Olmsted</strong>) was held by Robert Fitz Wimarc. Now<br />

Suen (holds it), and Siric' <strong>of</strong> him, as 1 manor and as 8 hides. Then 14<br />

ville<strong>in</strong>s; now 13. Then 31 bordars; now 36. Then 6 serfs; now 1. Then<br />

3 ploughs on <strong>the</strong> demesne; now 4. Then 19 ploughs belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> men;<br />

now 18. (There is) wood (land) for 500 sw<strong>in</strong>e, 22 acres <strong>of</strong> meadow, and pasture<br />

for 60 sheep. Then as now {semper) 1 mill, and 1 saltpan. Then 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!