13.08.2013 Views

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>English</strong> Ancestry <strong>of</strong><br />

we are correct in believing Elizabeth to be a daughter, which<br />

seems to be implied in the Will cited, she was very likely<br />

the eldest child, <strong>and</strong> not improbably there were other chil-<br />

dren, whose names have not been found.<br />

35 i. Elizabeth, 5 b. about 1532 ; mar. John Hayle <strong>of</strong> Ramsey,<br />

<strong>and</strong> had (1) John, 6 called " the younger" in his uncle's Will;<br />

(2) Wealthe ; <strong>and</strong> possibly (3) William named in the same<br />

Will. Elizabeth is not called his sister by John, although<br />

she is first named in his Will <strong>and</strong> given a larger legacy than<br />

Margaret, who is so styled ; her husb<strong>and</strong> also receives a<br />

legacy <strong>of</strong> £10, is made executor with John Wade who mar-<br />

ried the testator's " cousin Barbara," <strong>and</strong> finally is appointed<br />

guardian <strong>of</strong> his children. <strong>The</strong>se various facts lead to the<br />

conclusion that Elizabeth was a sister, <strong>and</strong> the eldest child<br />

<strong>of</strong> the family. <strong>The</strong> date <strong>of</strong> her death does not appear, but<br />

she was evidently living in 1571.<br />

36 ii. John, b. about 1534; mar. , who, as not mentioned<br />

in her husb<strong>and</strong>'s Will, probably died before him. He re-<br />

sided in Ramsey, <strong>and</strong> died in 1571, leaving issue.<br />

37 iii. Roger, b. about 1537 (?) ; mar. , <strong>and</strong> had issue. If<br />

any inference is to be drawn from the name <strong>of</strong> this son, it<br />

would confirm, quoad hoc, the theory <strong>of</strong> the line <strong>of</strong> descent<br />

<strong>of</strong> his father as suggested above ; it is not impossible that<br />

Roger was the eldest son, that position having been as-<br />

signed to John only because <strong>of</strong> his bearing his father's<br />

name.<br />

38 iv. Margaret, b. ; mar. Clarcke, <strong>of</strong> " Holbrecke,"*<br />

<strong>and</strong> had John* who received a contingent bequest in his<br />

uncle's Will. She was living in 157 1, but nothing further<br />

has been found.<br />

* Probably for Holbrook, a Parish in Suffolk, six miles from Ipswich,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!