The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ... The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

13.08.2013 Views

32 The English Ancestry of thought to be the eldest son. The date of his death is not known. For reasons given above it seems probable that he was the father of 10 Thomas, 3 of Harwich, Essex, b. about 1490 or earlier; mar. Anne ; d. in Harwich, November or December, 1550. 5 John 2 {Robert), of Washbrook, Suffolk, was probably born about 1468 ; he married Elizabeth , who survived him. He died in June, 1500, or more probably 15 12 (see pp. 25, 26), in Washbrook, where his father owned an estate which his Will directed should be sold ; whether this passed into the hands of John, or whether he had a home of his own there before his father removed to Ipswich, we cannot tell. As will be seen by his Will below, John also had a "tene- ment with appertenaunces " in Great Belstead, "lately called Smythys " [ ? Smyth's], very likely the name of its previous owner, and from the manner in which it is mentioned, re- cently acquired ; and we note that the Will of Rose, the widow of his son John, makes her "brother, John Smythe," her supervisor. The old Church in Great Belstead was dedicated to St. Mary. In the return of Church property in 1547, this Church had a bell, "which was broke v years past," and was " solde for xxx s . . . which is and shalbe Imployed to y e reperacs of y e chvrch roffe and y e palyng of y e chvrch-yerd." It was replaced in 1553. The location of the " Copy-lands " which are mentioned does not certainly appear, but it seems to have been in Great Belstead. This was a class of property subject to the pay-

Reinold and MattJiczv Marvin 33 ment of a nominal ground-rent to the lord of the manor : fourpence an acre for good land was thought a fair rate in the time of Richard II (1381).* Such lands passed by the Will of a tenant (as will be seen in several of the Wills be- low) in the same manner as free-hold, except that they were subject, on the death of a tenant, to the payment of "fines" to the lord, and certain court fees.f In this case the " Lord of the manor " was the Prioress and sisterhood of an Augus- tinian nunnery, founded in Dartford by Edward III, in 1355, whose rights entitled them to collect a small annual rental, and to receive a portion of the "fines" when the copy-hold passed to a new tenant. John Marvin directed that his interment should be in the Washbrooke Churchyard ; the Church in this little Parish *See Guest, " Handbook of English History," p. 301. The term " copy-hold " came from the technical expression, " tenure by copy of the court-roll, at the will of the lord, according to the custom of the manor " ; meaning, says one authority, that it is " tenure of land which is part of a manor, the title being evidenced by the court-rolls of the manor, and the right of the owner being in conformity with the immemorial customs thereof." t The " fine of lands " was an ancient method of transferring property which was more efficacious than an ordinary conveyance. An amicable suit was brought, in which one party, called the cognizee, claimed that the owner or seller, called the cog- nizor, was wrongfully withholding the land from the complainant; leave to compromise this fictitious suit was granted by the court, the cognizor acknowledging the withhold- ing, and the business was concluded by what was called the " foot of the fine," em- bodied in an indenture beginning " Ilaec estfinalis concordia," [This is the final agree- ment] which set forth the parties, the time and place of agreement, etc., and a note was made of the facts on the Court records. This was long the only way by which a married woman could convey lands. The " feet " of old fines are often of great impor- tance as evidence in pedigrees, and if the records of the transfers of the copy-holds mentioned in the various Wills we have found could be carefully investigated, it is very certain that much additional information concerning the wives (of whom in most cases we now know only their Christian names) and their families could be ascertained.

<strong>Reinold</strong> <strong>and</strong> MattJiczv <strong>Marvin</strong> 33<br />

ment <strong>of</strong> a nominal ground-rent to the lord <strong>of</strong> the manor :<br />

fourpence an acre for good l<strong>and</strong> was thought a fair rate in<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> Richard II (1381).* Such l<strong>and</strong>s passed by the<br />

Will <strong>of</strong> a tenant (as will be seen in several <strong>of</strong> the Wills be-<br />

low) in the same manner as free-hold, except that they were<br />

subject, on the death <strong>of</strong> a tenant, to the payment <strong>of</strong> "fines"<br />

to the lord, <strong>and</strong> certain court fees.f In this case the " Lord<br />

<strong>of</strong> the manor " was the Prioress <strong>and</strong> sisterhood <strong>of</strong> an Augus-<br />

tinian nunnery, founded in Dartford by Edward III, in 1355,<br />

whose rights entitled them to collect a small annual rental,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to receive a portion <strong>of</strong> the "fines" when the copy-hold<br />

passed to a new tenant.<br />

John <strong>Marvin</strong> directed that his interment should be in the<br />

Washbrooke Churchyard ;<br />

the Church in this little Parish<br />

*See Guest, " H<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> History," p. 301. <strong>The</strong> term " copy-hold " came<br />

from the technical expression, " tenure by copy <strong>of</strong> the court-roll, at the will <strong>of</strong> the lord,<br />

according to the custom <strong>of</strong> the manor " ; meaning, says one authority, that it is " tenure<br />

<strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> which is part <strong>of</strong> a manor, the title being evidenced by the court-rolls <strong>of</strong> the<br />

manor, <strong>and</strong> the right <strong>of</strong> the owner being in conformity with the immemorial customs<br />

there<strong>of</strong>."<br />

t <strong>The</strong> " fine <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s " was an ancient method <strong>of</strong> transferring property which was<br />

more efficacious than an ordinary conveyance. An amicable suit was brought, in<br />

which one party, called the cognizee, claimed that the owner or seller, called the cog-<br />

nizor, was wrongfully withholding the l<strong>and</strong> from the complainant; leave to compromise<br />

this fictitious suit was granted by the court, the cognizor acknowledging the withhold-<br />

ing, <strong>and</strong> the business was concluded by what was called the " foot <strong>of</strong> the fine," em-<br />

bodied in an indenture beginning " Ilaec estfinalis concordia," [This is the final agree-<br />

ment] which set forth the parties, the time <strong>and</strong> place <strong>of</strong> agreement, etc., <strong>and</strong> a note<br />

was made <strong>of</strong> the facts on the Court records. This was long the only way by which a<br />

married woman could convey l<strong>and</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> " feet " <strong>of</strong> old fines are <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>of</strong> great impor-<br />

tance as evidence in pedigrees, <strong>and</strong> if the records <strong>of</strong> the transfers <strong>of</strong> the copy-holds<br />

mentioned in the various Wills we have found could be carefully investigated, it is very<br />

certain that much additional information concerning the wives (<strong>of</strong> whom in most cases<br />

we now know only their Christian names) <strong>and</strong> their families could be ascertained.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!