13.08.2013 Views

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 <strong>The</strong> <strong>English</strong> Ancestry <strong>of</strong><br />

thought to be the eldest son. <strong>The</strong> date <strong>of</strong> his death is not<br />

known. For reasons given above it seems probable that he<br />

was the father <strong>of</strong><br />

10 Thomas, 3 <strong>of</strong> Harwich, Essex, b. about 1490 or earlier; mar.<br />

Anne ; d. in Harwich, November or December, 1550.<br />

5 John 2 {Robert), <strong>of</strong> Washbrook, Suffolk, was probably<br />

born about 1468 ; he married Elizabeth , who<br />

survived<br />

him. He died in June, 1500, or more probably 15 12 (see<br />

pp. 25, 26), in Washbrook, where his father owned an estate<br />

which his Will directed should be sold ; whether this passed<br />

into the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> John, or whether he had a home <strong>of</strong> his own<br />

there before his father removed to Ipswich, we cannot tell.<br />

As will be seen by his Will below, John also had a "tene-<br />

ment with appertenaunces " in Great Belstead, "lately called<br />

Smythys " [ ? Smyth's], very likely the name <strong>of</strong> its previous<br />

owner, <strong>and</strong> from the manner in which it is mentioned, re-<br />

cently acquired ; <strong>and</strong> we note that the Will <strong>of</strong> Rose, the<br />

widow <strong>of</strong> his son John, makes her "brother, John Smythe,"<br />

her supervisor. <strong>The</strong> old Church in Great Belstead was<br />

dedicated to St. Mary. In the return <strong>of</strong> Church property<br />

in 1547, this Church had a bell, "which was broke v years<br />

past," <strong>and</strong> was " solde for xxx s . . . which<br />

is <strong>and</strong> shalbe<br />

Imployed to y e reperacs <strong>of</strong> y e chvrch r<strong>of</strong>fe <strong>and</strong> y e palyng <strong>of</strong><br />

y e chvrch-yerd." It was replaced in 1553.<br />

<strong>The</strong> location <strong>of</strong> the " Copy-l<strong>and</strong>s " which are mentioned<br />

does not certainly appear, but it seems to have been in Great<br />

Belstead. This was a class <strong>of</strong> property subject to the pay-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!