The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ... The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

13.08.2013 Views

122 The English Ancestry of Before proceeding to the Sixth Generation some notes on the daughters of John 8 (12), properly belonging in the Fourth Generation, will be given. These are based on information received since the account of that family was printed.* 32 Maryon 4 (John* John, 2 Robert 1 ) was the daughter of John and Rose (Smythe) Marvin, of Chattisham, Suffolk. The date of her birth has not been ascertained, but was about 1525, for it is evident from what has been given above (pp. 69, 70) that the sisters were all quite young when their father died in 1535/6. From the provisions of his Will, in which Maryon is first named and apparently receives a larger portion than her sisters Agnes and Johan, I conclude that she was the eldest daughter. It is also clear from her mother's Will that Johan was unmarried in April, 1557. Rose men- tions her sons-in-law, Christopher Alderman, made executor, and Thomas Glamfelde, by which we learn the names of the husbands of the married daughters. The evidence on which is based the belief that Maryon was the wife of Glamfelde is found in the Will of a "Thomas Glamefeild of Hintlesham, Suffolk, husbandman." f This Will, of which an abstract is printed below, is dated at Hintlesham, a Parish adjoining Washbrook and Chattisham, 4 April, 1595, and was proved 22 May of that year. As it * See pp. 67-72, supra. t Recorded at Ipswich, Calendar of Suffolk Wills, Book XXXV (1594-5), fo. 394. I have an abstract of the Will of another Thomas Glamfelde, of Tatingstone, a Parish near Belstead, proved 19 October, 1592, and recorded at Ipswich, loc. cit. XXXIV (1592-3), fo. 168, which names wife Joan, son George executor, William, Edmond, not of age, and daughter Joan, which is clearly not this family.

Reiyiold and Matthew Marvin. 123 shows that the maker had at least five grandchildren, he was of suitable age to have been the son-in-law of Rose some forty years earlier; he makes his "wife Marrion " executrix, and among his children we find John, Rose, and Joan, names of the father, mother and sister of Maryon Marvin. From these various facts, the conclusion reached seems very probable. He owned a "tenement at Hintlesham," where he died, and "leasehold lands" in the same Parish. The tenement he had conveyed conditionally to his son Thomas about two years before his death, and the leasehold is given him in the Will. The indenture there mentioned has not been found, but it evidently secured for Maryon and her husband a home in their old age ; the children of the oldest son, Richard, are remembered, but nothing is given him ; " the rest of his goods," after the death of his wife, are to be divided among the other children. From this it would seem that Richard, and probably his brothers, had already received their share of the lands. The Parish was a demesne of the Timperleys, and the chancel of the Church, which is dedicated to St. Nicholas, contains several ancient monuments of that family, which long held the rentals of most of the lands in its vicinity. The population is about 600, and the living was valued at ^440 with a parsonage, in 1897, when the Rev. William Deane, M. A., had long been the Rector. If the proposed assignment is correct, we have the follow- ing as the names of the children of Thomas and Maryon —

122 <strong>The</strong> <strong>English</strong> Ancestry <strong>of</strong><br />

Before proceeding to the Sixth Generation some notes on<br />

the daughters <strong>of</strong> John 8<br />

(12), properly belonging in the Fourth<br />

Generation, will be given. <strong>The</strong>se are based on information<br />

received since the account <strong>of</strong> that family was printed.*<br />

32 Maryon 4 (John* John, 2 Robert 1<br />

) was the daughter <strong>of</strong><br />

John <strong>and</strong> Rose (Smythe) <strong>Marvin</strong>, <strong>of</strong> Chattisham, Suffolk.<br />

<strong>The</strong> date <strong>of</strong> her birth has not been ascertained, but was<br />

about 1525, for it is evident from what has been given above<br />

(pp. 69, 70) that the sisters were all quite young when their<br />

father died in 1535/6. From the provisions <strong>of</strong> his Will, in<br />

which Maryon is first named <strong>and</strong> apparently receives a larger<br />

portion than her sisters Agnes <strong>and</strong> Johan, I conclude that she<br />

was the eldest daughter. It is also clear from her mother's<br />

Will that Johan was unmarried in April, 1557. Rose men-<br />

tions her sons-in-law, Christopher Alderman, made executor,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Thomas Glamfelde, by which we learn the names <strong>of</strong> the<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the married daughters. <strong>The</strong> evidence on which<br />

is based the belief that Maryon was the wife <strong>of</strong> Glamfelde<br />

is found in the Will <strong>of</strong> a "Thomas Glamefeild <strong>of</strong> Hintlesham,<br />

Suffolk, husb<strong>and</strong>man." f<br />

This Will, <strong>of</strong> which an abstract is printed below, is dated at<br />

Hintlesham, a Parish adjoining Washbrook <strong>and</strong> Chattisham,<br />

4 April, 1595, <strong>and</strong> was proved 22 May <strong>of</strong> that year. As it<br />

* See pp. 67-72, supra.<br />

t Recorded at Ipswich, Calendar <strong>of</strong> Suffolk Wills, Book XXXV (1594-5), fo.<br />

394. I have an abstract <strong>of</strong> the Will <strong>of</strong> another Thomas Glamfelde, <strong>of</strong> Tatingstone, a<br />

Parish near Belstead, proved 19 October, 1592, <strong>and</strong> recorded at Ipswich, loc. cit.<br />

XXXIV (1592-3), fo. 168, which names wife Joan, son George executor, William,<br />

Edmond, not <strong>of</strong> age, <strong>and</strong> daughter Joan, which is clearly not this family.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!