13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1728.<br />

The System Dis- Mr. Stoddavd secms to have been greatly<br />

cussed. exercised by this affair, and was not easily<br />

appeased. As was the custom <strong>in</strong> the pla<strong>in</strong>-<br />

spoken debates <strong>of</strong> that time, there was undoubtedly an <strong>in</strong>terchange<br />

<strong>of</strong> sharp words, all the more bitter because <strong>of</strong><br />

the earnestness <strong>of</strong> the disputants. On the same day the<br />

''Half way Covenant" was partially discussed. Thacher<br />

thus refers to it under the above date : —<br />

" Ys day y> discussed y*' remedyes and debated at y" end <strong>of</strong> each Par-<br />

aoraph y" was much debate about Persons be<strong>in</strong>g admitted to full<br />

;<br />

communion & M'' Stodder y« m<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong>fered to dispute aga<strong>in</strong>st it &<br />

brought one argument. M'' Mather was respondent M'' Oaks Modrat%<br />

but after some time y'' rest <strong>of</strong> his argumts were deferred & at present<br />

it was eased."<br />

Mr. Stoddard's Ver- The opposltiou <strong>of</strong> Mr. Stoddard was to<br />

sion <strong>of</strong> the Debate. the report <strong>of</strong> the Committee, and not to<br />

the proposition to allow unregenerate per-<br />

sons to come to the communion table. His OAvn version <strong>of</strong><br />

this affair is annexed —<br />

:<br />

"The words <strong>of</strong> the Sjmod are these—It is requisite that Persons be<br />

not admitted unto Communion <strong>in</strong> the Lord's Supper without mak<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

Personal & Public Pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> their Faith and Repentance. I shall<br />

give the world an Account how the matter was acted. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Elders <strong>in</strong> the Synod had drawn up a Conclusion. That persons should<br />

make a Relation <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> God's Spirit upon their hearts, <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to full Communion. Some others <strong>of</strong> the Elders objected<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st it. and after some discourse it was agreed to have a dispute on<br />

that qiiestion. Whether those Pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> Religion as are <strong>of</strong> good<br />

Conversation, are not to be admitted to full Communion, provided they<br />

are able to Exam<strong>in</strong>e themselves, and discern the Lord's body. Mr.<br />

[Increase] Mather, held the negative ; I labored to make good the<br />

Affirmative ;<br />

the result was That they blotted out that clause <strong>of</strong> Mak-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g a Relation <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> God's Spirit, and put <strong>in</strong> the room <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

and so I<br />

The Mak<strong>in</strong>g a Pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> their Faith and Repentance :<br />

Voted with the Rest, and am <strong>of</strong> the same judgment still." i<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mr. Thacher, the discussion was evidently<br />

cut short. The Synod was unwill<strong>in</strong>g to enter upon an <strong>in</strong>term<strong>in</strong>able<br />

debate upon a question that had not been propounded<br />

for <strong>its</strong> deliberation.<br />

1 Mr. Stoddard's Appeal to the Learned.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!