History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

13.08.2013 Views

58 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1728. God's Spirit in their Hearts ; against the exceptions of In- crease Mather." Here the matter rested till twenty years after the death of Mr. Stoddard. The discussion was revived by Jonathan Edwards in 1749, and was continued through the century. Its Popularity. The doctriue advocated by Mr. Stoddard was popular during his lifetime, and nearly all the churches in the Hampshire Association, which em- braced the old County of Hampshire and three towns in Connecticut, practiced the system. At the time of the dismission of Mr. Edwards, not more than three of the twentyfive settled pastors within the limits of the Association were decidedly anti-Stoddardean. ^ Tradition Coucern- In counectiou witli tliis belief, and so curling His own Con- ously explanatory of it in part that one might wish it were unimpeachable, comes the tradition concerning the conversion of Mr. Stoddard himself. Nothing appears to establish the reliability of the story, yet the possibility of its truth wonderfully illumi- nates the position of the Northampton pastor. It would, of course, have more value and force, had Mr. Stoddard been the originator of the practice he so strenuously upheld. This tradition is related by Rev. Dr. Lathrop, who set- tled at West Springfield soon after Mr. Edwards was dismissed, when the recollection of that bitter struggle was fresh in mind. His statement is that, when Mr. Stoddard was installed over the church at Northampton, he had not been converted. His wife, widow of his predecessor. Rev. Eleazar Mather, becoming convinced of this fact, arranged a series of weekly meetings with other Christian ladies of the congregation to pray that the pastor might experience a change of heart. "At length Mr. Stoddard was led to notice that on a certain day of each week, in the afternoon, his wife was wont to go out as to some appointment." His curiosity becoming excited, he asked her " what it was that called her away with such an unvarying regularity each week. She told him frankly. * * * This set Mr. Stoddard upon a course of most serious and earnest thinking," 1 " Stoddardeanism," New Euglander, 184G, vol. 4, p. 350.

1"28.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 59 and some time afterwards, while administering the Lord's Supper, he suddenly had such "a new and wonderful reve- lation of the gosi)el scheme," that he was scarcely able to complete the service. ^ Proposes to Estab- About tliis time lie advocated the establishlish a National jj^eut of a "National Church." He contended that individual churches should be accountable to some controlling authority, else " every particular Congregation is absolute and independant, and not responsable to any higher Power. " The proposition, however, did not meet with general acceptance, and no attempt was made to carry out the suggestion. ^ Takes Part in the In the fall of 1679, a Syuod of the churches, Reforming Synod, called the "Reforming Synod," was convened at Boston by order of the General Court. 3 Mr. Stoddard was a member of it and took a prominent part in its deliberations. No published report of the proceedings of this body was ever made, and the Journal of Peter Thacher* seems to be the only record of its transactions at present available. Its results were printed by order of the General Court, but not its proceedings. An episode in the debate in which Mr. Stoddard prominently figured is thus related by Mr. Thacher : — " After Lecture y^ sins of oppression was in debate & soe m' Whel- lock declares y' yer was a cry of injustice in y* magistrates & ministers were not rated [taxed] w"^ Occasioned a very warme discourse. M"" stodder charged y Deputy [Whellock] with saying what was not true & y Deputy Govern'' told him he deserved to be laid by y' heals &c. after we brokeup y Deputy asked forgivenesse of him & told him hee freely forgave him. but uv Stodder was high. " 19 Sept. '79. ¥* Deputy owned his being in to great a heat & desired y Lord to forgive &c : & m' Stodder did something tho' very little by a Deputy." 1 New Englander, 188J. vol. 43, pp. 6'34, 625. 2 Dexter's Congregationalism, p. 510. 3 Its duty was "the reuisall of the platforme of diseipljne agreed vpon by the churches, 1647, and what else may appeare necessary for the preventing schishmes, haeresies, prophaness, & the establishment of the churches in one faith & order of the gospell.'"— Records of Massachusetts, vol. 5, p. 215. 4 The entire Journal is published in Walker's Creeds and Platforms of Congrega- tionalism, pp. 417-419. ,

58 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1728.<br />

God's Spirit <strong>in</strong> their Hearts ;<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st the exceptions <strong>of</strong> In-<br />

crease Mather." Here the matter rested till twenty years<br />

after the death <strong>of</strong> Mr. Stoddard. The discussion was revived<br />

by Jonathan Edwards <strong>in</strong> 1749, and was cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

through the century.<br />

Its Popularity. The doctriue advocated by Mr. Stoddard<br />

was popular dur<strong>in</strong>g his lifetime, and nearly<br />

all the churches <strong>in</strong> the Hampshire Association, which em-<br />

braced the old County <strong>of</strong> Hampshire and three towns <strong>in</strong><br />

Connecticut, practiced the system. At the time <strong>of</strong> the dismission<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Edwards, not more than three <strong>of</strong> the twentyfive<br />

settled pastors with<strong>in</strong> the lim<strong>its</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Association<br />

were decidedly anti-Stoddardean. ^<br />

Tradition Coucern- In counectiou witli tliis belief, and so curl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

His own Con- ously explanatory <strong>of</strong> it <strong>in</strong> part that one<br />

might wish it were unimpeachable, comes<br />

the tradition concern<strong>in</strong>g the conversion <strong>of</strong> Mr. Stoddard<br />

himself. Noth<strong>in</strong>g appears to establish the reliability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

story, yet the possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>its</strong> truth wonderfully illumi-<br />

nates the position <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Northampton</strong> pastor. It would, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, have more value and force, had Mr. Stoddard been<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>of</strong> the practice he so strenuously upheld.<br />

This tradition is related by Rev. Dr. Lathrop, who set-<br />

tled at West Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield soon after Mr. Edwards was dismissed,<br />

when the recollection <strong>of</strong> that bitter struggle was<br />

fresh <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. His statement is that, when Mr. Stoddard<br />

was <strong>in</strong>stalled over the church at <strong>Northampton</strong>, he had not<br />

been converted. His wife, widow <strong>of</strong> his predecessor. Rev.<br />

Eleazar Mather, becom<strong>in</strong>g conv<strong>in</strong>ced <strong>of</strong> this fact, arranged<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> weekly meet<strong>in</strong>gs with other Christian ladies <strong>of</strong><br />

the congregation to pray that the pastor might experience<br />

a change <strong>of</strong> heart. "At length Mr. Stoddard was led to<br />

notice that on a certa<strong>in</strong> day <strong>of</strong> each week, <strong>in</strong> the afternoon,<br />

his wife was wont to go out as to some appo<strong>in</strong>tment." His<br />

curiosity becom<strong>in</strong>g excited, he asked her " what it was that<br />

called her away with such an unvary<strong>in</strong>g regularity each<br />

week. She told him frankly. * * * This set Mr. Stoddard<br />

upon a course <strong>of</strong> most serious and earnest th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g,"<br />

1 " Stoddardeanism," New Euglander, 184G, vol. 4, p. 350.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!