History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
56 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1728. enant, tliougli tliey gave no evidence of regeneration ? The general belief, supported by tlie combined testimony of all who have written upon the subject, is that such was his practice. Yet he " preached earnestly and powerfully upon the necessity of regeneration and a holy life in order to salvation." ^ It should be borne in mind that the half-way covenant was adopted for the purpose of admitting persons far enough into the church to allow the baptism of their children, with the hope that when once entered and brought under religious influences, they would grow in grace, and come within the fold. It was simply in furtherance of this purpose, that the church in Northampton put its candidates " into a state of education," requiring them "publicly to take hold of the covenant of the Lord as a grace bestowing covenant." Mr. Stoddard's idea seems to have been but Mr. Stoddard's Pecuiiar System a auotlier stcp in tliis systcm of religious culious Education. turc. He claimed that " the Lord's Supper is instituted to be a means of regeneration," and so to be employed as an incentive towards the adoption of a religious life. The church doors were not even par- tially opened to any who were not willing to publicly acknowledge their belief in the tenets of salvation, by " owning the covenant," and " subjecting themselves to the teachings & government of Jesus Christ in this church & engaging according to their place and power to promote the welfare of it." By this means they formed a connection with the church sufficient to admit themselves and their children to the rite of baptism. To emphasize and accelerate this process of education was the design and purport of " Stoddardeanism." Mr. Stoddard complained of having^ been misunderstood and misrepresented. He did not believe nor did he argue that the rite in itself had any saving efficacy.^ Admission to the Lord's Table was not in his view the only qualification for salvation. But whatever may have been the opinion of the pastor, the church had 1 Rev. J. p. Thompson, Bib. Sacra, vol. 18, p. 819. 3 " As Mr. Stoddard explained his view it was not that nou-believers of whatever grade should use the Lord's Supper as a saving ordinance, but that those whom he regarded as nominally in church connection by bapti.sm, though timid and unsatisfied as to their spiritual state should use this ordinance as a means of grace."—Bib. Sac, vol. 18, p. 819.
1728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 57 prescribed the method of admitting persons to full membership, and the records contain no intimation that it had ever been changed. Neither is there anything to be found in them authorizing the statement that Mr. Stoddard adopted a form of confession in accordance with his own peculiar views. The Reforming Synod of 1679, declared that persons must make profession of faith and repentance in order to gain full admission into the church, and Mr. Stoddard admits that" he voted in its favor. Though the doctrine advocated by him was only partially discussed in that assembly, the inference is undoubted that notwithstanding the admission to partake of the holy rite of communion, which was then practiced in other churches if not in Northampton, candidates must also make a profession of faith and repentance. Mr. Stoddard was not so inconsistent as to preach one doctrine and practice another. The Scheme Pro- No reliable data are at hand sufficient to demuigated. temiiue when this method was introduced here. There is a probability, however, that it was in practice in Northampton as early as 1077, within five years of the settlement of the second minister. In that year. Increase Mather, in an election sermon, denounced the prevalence of " Stoddardeanism " among the clergy. ^ Two years later Mr. Stoddard seems to have up- held this theory at the session of the Reforming Synod, as far as he was permitted. It was not. however, till the opening of the eighteenth century that he alluded to the subject in the pulpit. The public discussion of the question between Increase and Cotton Mather on one side, and Mr. Stoddard on the other, commenced in the year 1700, though the sermon in which the latter fully explained his views was not delivered till 1704, nor published till three years later. Books, pamphlets, sermons followed each other in quick succession for eight or nine years. In 1709, Mr. Stoddard published the final vindication of his system in a sermon entitled, " An Appeal to the Learned, Being a Vindication of the Right of Visible Saints to the Lord's Supper, Though they be destitute of a Saving Work of 1 Walker's Creeds and Platforms of Congregatioualism, p. 880.
- Page 33 and 34: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 5
- Page 35 and 36: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 7
- Page 37 and 38: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 9
- Page 39 and 40: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 1
- Page 41 and 42: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE— COSTUMES.
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER II. FATHKR RALE S WAR. Anot
- Page 45 and 46: 1722.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 17 person
- Page 47 and 48: 1721-17-23.] FATHER rale's WAR. 19
- Page 49 and 50: 1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31 Lieut.
- Page 51 and 52: 1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 23 In thi
- Page 53 and 54: 1722-1736.1 FATHER RALE'S WAR. 25 E
- Page 55 and 56: 1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 27 4 scor
- Page 57 and 58: 1725.1 FATHER RALE'S WAR. 29 •chu
- Page 59 and 60: 1725.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31 On the
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER III. LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—
- Page 63 and 64: 1725] LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHAM
- Page 65 and 66: 1727] LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHAM
- Page 67 and 68: 1734.] LEOISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHA
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER IV. JONATHAN EDWARDS SETTLE
- Page 71 and 72: 1725] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGUE
- Page 73 and 74: 172C..] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAG
- Page 75 and 76: 1727.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 77 and 78: 1727.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 79 and 80: 1T27.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 81 and 82: 1728.] REV SOLOMON STODDARD. 53 Oct
- Page 83: 3728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 55
- Page 87 and 88: 1"28.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 59 an
- Page 89 and 90: 1728.1 REV, SOLOMON STODDARD. 61 Pu
- Page 91 and 92: 1728.1 REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 63 Re
- Page 94: KAC-SIMILE OF SOLOMON STODDARD'S SE
- Page 98 and 99: 66 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1728. o
- Page 100 and 101: 68 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1735. (
- Page 102 and 103: 70 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1736. T
- Page 104 and 105: 72 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. f
- Page 106 and 107: 74 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. a
- Page 108 and 109: 76 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [ITS?. w
- Page 110 and 111: 78 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. t
- Page 112 and 113: 80 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T35. a
- Page 114 and 115: 82 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1735. P
- Page 116 and 117: 84 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1736. i
- Page 118 and 119: 86 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1738. y
- Page 120 and 121: 88 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1738. m
- Page 122 and 123: 90 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. l1"39. w
- Page 124 and 125: 92 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. t
- Page 126 and 127: 94 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. "
- Page 128 and 129: 96 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1754. m
- Page 130 and 131: 98 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. t
- Page 132 and 133: 100 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T45.
56 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1728.<br />
enant, tliougli tliey gave no evidence <strong>of</strong> regeneration ?<br />
The general belief, supported by tlie comb<strong>in</strong>ed testimony <strong>of</strong><br />
all who have written upon the subject, is that such was his<br />
practice. Yet he " preached earnestly and powerfully upon<br />
the necessity <strong>of</strong> regeneration and a holy life <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
salvation." ^ It should be borne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that the half-way<br />
covenant was adopted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> admitt<strong>in</strong>g persons<br />
far enough <strong>in</strong>to the church to allow the baptism <strong>of</strong> their<br />
children, with the hope that when once entered and brought<br />
under religious <strong>in</strong>fluences, they would grow <strong>in</strong> grace, and<br />
come with<strong>in</strong> the fold. It was simply <strong>in</strong> furtherance <strong>of</strong> this<br />
purpose, that the church <strong>in</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> put <strong>its</strong> candidates<br />
" <strong>in</strong>to a state <strong>of</strong> education," requir<strong>in</strong>g them "publicly to<br />
take hold <strong>of</strong> the covenant <strong>of</strong> the Lord as a grace bestow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
covenant."<br />
Mr. Stoddard's idea seems to have been but<br />
Mr. Stoddard's Pecuiiar<br />
System a auotlier stcp <strong>in</strong> tliis systcm <strong>of</strong> religious culious<br />
Education. turc. He claimed that " the Lord's Supper<br />
is <strong>in</strong>stituted to be a means <strong>of</strong> regeneration,"<br />
and so to be employed as an <strong>in</strong>centive towards the adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> a religious life. The church doors were not even par-<br />
tially opened to any who were not will<strong>in</strong>g to publicly acknowledge<br />
their belief <strong>in</strong> the tenets <strong>of</strong> salvation, by " own<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the covenant," and " subject<strong>in</strong>g themselves to the teach<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
& government <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ <strong>in</strong> this church & engag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to their place and power to promote the<br />
welfare <strong>of</strong> it." By this means they formed a connection<br />
with the church sufficient to admit themselves and their<br />
children to the rite <strong>of</strong> baptism. To emphasize and accelerate<br />
this process <strong>of</strong> education was the design and purport<br />
<strong>of</strong> " Stoddardeanism." Mr. Stoddard compla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g^<br />
been misunderstood and misrepresented. He did not believe<br />
nor did he argue that the rite <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong>elf had any sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
efficacy.^ Admission to the Lord's Table was not <strong>in</strong> his<br />
view the only qualification for salvation. But whatever<br />
may have been the op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the pastor, the church had<br />
1 Rev. J. p. Thompson, Bib. Sacra, vol. 18, p. 819.<br />
3 " As Mr. Stoddard expla<strong>in</strong>ed his view it was not that nou-believers <strong>of</strong> whatever<br />
grade should use the Lord's Supper as a sav<strong>in</strong>g ord<strong>in</strong>ance, but that those whom he<br />
regarded as nom<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong> church connection by bapti.sm, though timid and unsatisfied<br />
as to their spiritual state should use this ord<strong>in</strong>ance as a means <strong>of</strong> grace."—Bib.<br />
Sac, vol. 18, p. 819.