13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

478 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1786.<br />

Jonathan Ashley, Samuel Field and Jonas Baker." These<br />

petitioners were all residents <strong>of</strong> towns <strong>in</strong> the northern part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the county. Several <strong>of</strong> them belonged <strong>in</strong> Deerfield,<br />

and the rest <strong>in</strong> contiguous towns. The Legislature referred<br />

the matter to the several towns <strong>in</strong> the county, request<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them " to give their reasons why the county should not be<br />

divided agreeably to said petition." The question came<br />

before the town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, at a meet<strong>in</strong>g held <strong>in</strong><br />

May, when the town not only voted aga<strong>in</strong>st it, but <strong>in</strong>-<br />

structed <strong>its</strong> representatives " to use their Influence <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Gen'l Court to prevent any such Division <strong>of</strong> the County."<br />

The proposition was to form a new county <strong>from</strong> the<br />

northeastern portion <strong>of</strong> Hampshire and the northwestern<br />

part <strong>of</strong> Worcester County. The response <strong>from</strong> the towns<br />

was decidedly aga<strong>in</strong>st any such division, and noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

further was done at that time. But the design was not<br />

abandoned. It was pressed aga<strong>in</strong> the next year, but without<br />

success.<br />

A Convention Consid- In May, 1786, a convention met at Haters<br />

the subject. Q.e\d for the purpose <strong>of</strong> discuss<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

question, <strong>in</strong> which forty-one towns were<br />

represented. Among the reasons advanced <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposition was the <strong>in</strong>convenience <strong>of</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g the towns <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> and Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, where all the courts were<br />

held. The county then extended <strong>from</strong> the Vermont l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

on the north to that <strong>of</strong> Connecticut on the south, and the<br />

courts were held and all bus<strong>in</strong>ess transacted below the center<br />

<strong>of</strong> the county. The convention voted twenty-two<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st and n<strong>in</strong>eteen <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> a division. A vote to cen-<br />

ter the courts showed twenty-three aga<strong>in</strong>st and eighteen <strong>in</strong><br />

favor <strong>of</strong> such a proposition. The suggestion that two<br />

courts should be held at Deerfield, received twenty-four<br />

votes <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> favor and seventeen aga<strong>in</strong>st. Noth<strong>in</strong>g, however,<br />

was accomplished, and many years elapsed before the<br />

county was divided.<br />

Pews <strong>in</strong> the Meet<strong>in</strong>g- This year saw the last <strong>of</strong> the benches <strong>in</strong><br />

^o^^^- the meet<strong>in</strong>g-house. All the long seats<br />

places.<br />

were taken out, and pews erected <strong>in</strong> their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!