History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

13.08.2013 Views

20 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1723. an eiiem5\ Authorized l)y tlie Legislature on the 37''' of December, 1733, it was built on " Equivalent Lands" in the town of Brattleboro, on the west bank of the Connecticut Biver, on what is now known as "Brooks Farm,"^ Col. Stoddard was ordered to superintend the building of the fort. In Februarj^ 1734, he writes that he had committed the work to Lieut. Timothy Dwight of Northampton, who had under him a detail of "'4 carpenters, 12 soldiers with narrow axes, and 3 teams." The structure was built of yellow jmie logs, hewn and laid up after the manner of an ordinary log house. This blockhouse was about one hundred eighty feet square, houses being built against the walls, leaving the center open and unobstructed, for a parade-ground. Opposition to the Allusious in the correspondence of Col. Buiidiug of the Stoddarcl, indicate that there was consid- Blockhouse. ,1 ... • -\t j.n j. •£ x • erable opposition m JMorthampton, it not in other places, to the establishment of this fort. In Novem- ber, Col. Stoddard writes, " Many find fault with it (the blockhouse), some out of ignorance, and more out of per- verseiiess." The op]iosition, however, amounted to but little, and was not long continued. It had some effect upon the political fortunes of Col. Stoddard, and contributed largely to his defeat in the contest for representative in that year, though dissatisfaction with the Sewer Commission, already noted, ^ had perhaps as great an influence. The fort was of great value during the war, and served an ex- cellent purpose. Col. Stoddard frequently alludes to its utility. Writing to Gov. Dummer, in August, he says — : ' ' No party of the enemy hath passed the fort without being discovered, which has been the means of preserving many lives." For some time after its erection it was known as the ''Blockhouse," but was afterwards named "Fort Dummer," by Capt. Dwight, in honor of the then acting- Governor of the Province. Capt. Dwight. with a company of fifty-five men, held command of the fort during the war. According to his report, its cost in labor and mate- rials was £356.4.1. 1 Sheldon's History of Deerflekl, vol. 1, p. 407. 2 Vol. 1, p. 521.

1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31 Lieut. Seari, Chap- Wlieii Capt. Dwiglit was Ordered to build lain Daniel ^jyd gaiTisoii the blockhouse, he selected for his second in command Lieut, Elisha Searl, who wlien a boy, had been captured by tlie Indians at Pascommiick, carried to Canada, and afterwards returned. 1 Col. Stoddard thus endorses him : " He is now a Sergeant under Capt. Kellogg ; was put in at the request of the assembly, on his return from Canada, where he had long been a prisoner. He seems to be a discreet and careful man."" Capt. Dwight had not long been on duty at the new fort, before he applied for a Chaplain. "We shall lead a heathenish life, unless a He writes : chaplain be allowed" them. Consequently, in July his request was granted by the appointment of Daniel Dwight^ of Northampton, who served two years. His salary was £100. The muster-roll of Capt. D wight's company contains the names of but three Northampton men. Captain, Liieutenant, and Chaplain. In Marcli, Col. Stoddard reiterated the pro- Col. Stoddard Suggests the use of posal of his father, made twenty years before,-'' that dogs should be used in the pursuit of Indians. Another twenty years passed, however, before the suggestion was carried into effect in this vicini- ty. In a letter dated Northampton, March 37'", 1724, Col. Stoddard writes — : "If the Indians do not join us shortly, it will be best that a number of good dogs be provided, which I hope may near as well answer our design, for I think they mnj be instructed to pursue an enemy, and if they should kill an Indian it will more effectually prevent their coming than the killing of 20 in any other way." Fort Duuimer was an outpost, headquarters Indians to Serve in the Fort. of observation, from which scouting parties were sent in all directions, and as Indians were thought to be expert in such Inisiness, an attempt was made to engage them for service there. Capt. Kellogg was sent to Albany to enlist them, but few only were obtained, and those who were employed were careful to absent 1 hem- selves when any fighting was to be done. 1 Vol. 1. p. 496. 2 Daniel Dwight was the third son of Nathaniel Dwight of Northampton, and was afterwards a minister at Charlestown, S. C. 3 Vol. 1. p. 477.

1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31<br />

Lieut. Seari, Chap- Wlieii Capt. Dwiglit was Ordered to build<br />

la<strong>in</strong> Daniel ^jyd gaiTisoii the blockhouse, he selected<br />

for his second <strong>in</strong> command Lieut, Elisha<br />

Searl, who wlien a boy, had been captured by tlie Indians<br />

at Pascommiick, carried to Canada, and afterwards returned.<br />

1 Col. Stoddard thus endorses him : " He is now a<br />

Sergeant under Capt. Kellogg ; was put <strong>in</strong> at the request <strong>of</strong><br />

the assembly, on his return <strong>from</strong> Canada, where he had<br />

long been a prisoner. He seems to be a discreet and careful<br />

man."" Capt. Dwight had not long been on duty at the<br />

new fort, before he applied for a Chapla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

"We shall lead a heathenish life, unless a<br />

He writes :<br />

chapla<strong>in</strong> be<br />

allowed" them. Consequently, <strong>in</strong> July his request was<br />

granted by the appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> Daniel Dwight^ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>,<br />

who served two years. His salary was £100. The<br />

muster-roll <strong>of</strong> Capt. D wight's company conta<strong>in</strong>s the names<br />

<strong>of</strong> but three <strong>Northampton</strong> men. Capta<strong>in</strong>, Liieutenant, and<br />

Chapla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

In Marcli, Col. Stoddard reiterated the pro-<br />

Col. Stoddard Suggests<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> posal <strong>of</strong> his father, made twenty years before,-''<br />

that dogs should be used <strong>in</strong> the pursuit<br />

<strong>of</strong> Indians. Another twenty years passed, however,<br />

before the suggestion was carried <strong>in</strong>to effect <strong>in</strong> this vic<strong>in</strong>i-<br />

ty. In a letter dated <strong>Northampton</strong>, March 37'", 1724, Col.<br />

Stoddard writes —<br />

:<br />

"If the Indians do not jo<strong>in</strong> us shortly, it will be best that a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> good dogs be provided, which I hope may near as well answer our<br />

design, for I th<strong>in</strong>k they mnj be <strong>in</strong>structed to pursue an enemy, and if<br />

they should kill an Indian it will more effectually prevent their com<strong>in</strong>g<br />

than the kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 20 <strong>in</strong> any other way."<br />

Fort Duuimer was an outpost, headquarters<br />

Indians to Serve <strong>in</strong><br />

the Fort. <strong>of</strong> observation, <strong>from</strong> which scout<strong>in</strong>g parties<br />

were sent <strong>in</strong> all directions, and as Indians<br />

were thought to be expert <strong>in</strong> such Inis<strong>in</strong>ess, an attempt was<br />

made to engage them for service there. Capt. Kellogg was<br />

sent to Albany to enlist them, but few only were obta<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />

and those who were employed were careful to absent 1 hem-<br />

selves when any fight<strong>in</strong>g was to be done.<br />

1 Vol. 1. p. 496.<br />

2 Daniel Dwight was the third son <strong>of</strong> Nathaniel Dwight <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, and was<br />

afterwards a m<strong>in</strong>ister at Charlestown, S. C.<br />

3 Vol. 1. p. 477.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!