History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
20 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1723. an eiiem5\ Authorized l)y tlie Legislature on the 37''' of December, 1733, it was built on " Equivalent Lands" in the town of Brattleboro, on the west bank of the Connecticut Biver, on what is now known as "Brooks Farm,"^ Col. Stoddard was ordered to superintend the building of the fort. In Februarj^ 1734, he writes that he had committed the work to Lieut. Timothy Dwight of Northampton, who had under him a detail of "'4 carpenters, 12 soldiers with narrow axes, and 3 teams." The structure was built of yellow jmie logs, hewn and laid up after the manner of an ordinary log house. This blockhouse was about one hundred eighty feet square, houses being built against the walls, leaving the center open and unobstructed, for a parade-ground. Opposition to the Allusious in the correspondence of Col. Buiidiug of the Stoddarcl, indicate that there was consid- Blockhouse. ,1 ... • -\t j.n j. •£ x • erable opposition m JMorthampton, it not in other places, to the establishment of this fort. In Novem- ber, Col. Stoddard writes, " Many find fault with it (the blockhouse), some out of ignorance, and more out of per- verseiiess." The op]iosition, however, amounted to but little, and was not long continued. It had some effect upon the political fortunes of Col. Stoddard, and contributed largely to his defeat in the contest for representative in that year, though dissatisfaction with the Sewer Commission, already noted, ^ had perhaps as great an influence. The fort was of great value during the war, and served an ex- cellent purpose. Col. Stoddard frequently alludes to its utility. Writing to Gov. Dummer, in August, he says — : ' ' No party of the enemy hath passed the fort without being discovered, which has been the means of preserving many lives." For some time after its erection it was known as the ''Blockhouse," but was afterwards named "Fort Dummer," by Capt. Dwight, in honor of the then acting- Governor of the Province. Capt. Dwight. with a company of fifty-five men, held command of the fort during the war. According to his report, its cost in labor and mate- rials was £356.4.1. 1 Sheldon's History of Deerflekl, vol. 1, p. 407. 2 Vol. 1, p. 521.
1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31 Lieut. Seari, Chap- Wlieii Capt. Dwiglit was Ordered to build lain Daniel ^jyd gaiTisoii the blockhouse, he selected for his second in command Lieut, Elisha Searl, who wlien a boy, had been captured by tlie Indians at Pascommiick, carried to Canada, and afterwards returned. 1 Col. Stoddard thus endorses him : " He is now a Sergeant under Capt. Kellogg ; was put in at the request of the assembly, on his return from Canada, where he had long been a prisoner. He seems to be a discreet and careful man."" Capt. Dwight had not long been on duty at the new fort, before he applied for a Chaplain. "We shall lead a heathenish life, unless a He writes : chaplain be allowed" them. Consequently, in July his request was granted by the appointment of Daniel Dwight^ of Northampton, who served two years. His salary was £100. The muster-roll of Capt. D wight's company contains the names of but three Northampton men. Captain, Liieutenant, and Chaplain. In Marcli, Col. Stoddard reiterated the pro- Col. Stoddard Suggests the use of posal of his father, made twenty years before,-'' that dogs should be used in the pursuit of Indians. Another twenty years passed, however, before the suggestion was carried into effect in this vicini- ty. In a letter dated Northampton, March 37'", 1724, Col. Stoddard writes — : "If the Indians do not join us shortly, it will be best that a number of good dogs be provided, which I hope may near as well answer our design, for I think they mnj be instructed to pursue an enemy, and if they should kill an Indian it will more effectually prevent their coming than the killing of 20 in any other way." Fort Duuimer was an outpost, headquarters Indians to Serve in the Fort. of observation, from which scouting parties were sent in all directions, and as Indians were thought to be expert in such Inisiness, an attempt was made to engage them for service there. Capt. Kellogg was sent to Albany to enlist them, but few only were obtained, and those who were employed were careful to absent 1 hem- selves when any fighting was to be done. 1 Vol. 1. p. 496. 2 Daniel Dwight was the third son of Nathaniel Dwight of Northampton, and was afterwards a minister at Charlestown, S. C. 3 Vol. 1. p. 477.
- Page 2 and 3: UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AT AMHE
- Page 9 and 10: HISTORY OF ^ O 11 T 11 A M P T O ]^
- Page 11 and 12: PREFACE The author of these volumes
- Page 13 and 14: CONTENTS CHAPTER I. DWELLINGS—FUR
- Page 15 and 16: CONTENTS. VII CHAPTER VI. NEW MEETI
- Page 17 and 18: CONTENTS. IX CHAPTER XIII. COL, JOH
- Page 19 and 20: CONTENTS. XI CHAPTER XIX. FOURTH FR
- Page 21 and 22: CONTENTS. XIII CHAPTER XXIV. REVOLU
- Page 23 and 24: CONTENTS. XV CHAPTER XXIX. REVOLUTI
- Page 25 and 26: CONTENTS. XVII CHAPTER XXXIV. SHAYS
- Page 27 and 28: CONTENTS. XIX CHAPTER XXXIX. MEMORI
- Page 29 and 30: HISTORY or NORTHAMPTON Pirst Houses
- Page 31 and 32: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 3
- Page 33 and 34: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 5
- Page 35 and 36: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 7
- Page 37 and 38: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 9
- Page 39 and 40: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE—COSTUMES. 1
- Page 41 and 42: DWELLINGS—FURNITURE— COSTUMES.
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER II. FATHKR RALE S WAR. Anot
- Page 45 and 46: 1722.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 17 person
- Page 47: 1721-17-23.] FATHER rale's WAR. 19
- Page 51 and 52: 1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 23 In thi
- Page 53 and 54: 1722-1736.1 FATHER RALE'S WAR. 25 E
- Page 55 and 56: 1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 27 4 scor
- Page 57 and 58: 1725.1 FATHER RALE'S WAR. 29 •chu
- Page 59 and 60: 1725.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31 On the
- Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER III. LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—
- Page 63 and 64: 1725] LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHAM
- Page 65 and 66: 1727] LEGISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHAM
- Page 67 and 68: 1734.] LEOISLATIVE CONTEST—SOUTHA
- Page 69 and 70: CHAPTER IV. JONATHAN EDWARDS SETTLE
- Page 71 and 72: 1725] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGUE
- Page 73 and 74: 172C..] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAG
- Page 75 and 76: 1727.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 77 and 78: 1727.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 79 and 80: 1T27.] JONATHAN EDWARDS AS COLLEAGU
- Page 81 and 82: 1728.] REV SOLOMON STODDARD. 53 Oct
- Page 83 and 84: 3728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 55
- Page 85 and 86: 1728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 57 pr
- Page 87 and 88: 1"28.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 59 an
- Page 89 and 90: 1728.1 REV, SOLOMON STODDARD. 61 Pu
- Page 91 and 92: 1728.1 REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 63 Re
- Page 94: KAC-SIMILE OF SOLOMON STODDARD'S SE
1724.] FATHER RALE'S WAR. 31<br />
Lieut. Seari, Chap- Wlieii Capt. Dwiglit was Ordered to build<br />
la<strong>in</strong> Daniel ^jyd gaiTisoii the blockhouse, he selected<br />
for his second <strong>in</strong> command Lieut, Elisha<br />
Searl, who wlien a boy, had been captured by tlie Indians<br />
at Pascommiick, carried to Canada, and afterwards returned.<br />
1 Col. Stoddard thus endorses him : " He is now a<br />
Sergeant under Capt. Kellogg ; was put <strong>in</strong> at the request <strong>of</strong><br />
the assembly, on his return <strong>from</strong> Canada, where he had<br />
long been a prisoner. He seems to be a discreet and careful<br />
man."" Capt. Dwight had not long been on duty at the<br />
new fort, before he applied for a Chapla<strong>in</strong>.<br />
"We shall lead a heathenish life, unless a<br />
He writes :<br />
chapla<strong>in</strong> be<br />
allowed" them. Consequently, <strong>in</strong> July his request was<br />
granted by the appo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>of</strong> Daniel Dwight^ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>,<br />
who served two years. His salary was £100. The<br />
muster-roll <strong>of</strong> Capt. D wight's company conta<strong>in</strong>s the names<br />
<strong>of</strong> but three <strong>Northampton</strong> men. Capta<strong>in</strong>, Liieutenant, and<br />
Chapla<strong>in</strong>.<br />
In Marcli, Col. Stoddard reiterated the pro-<br />
Col. Stoddard Suggests<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> posal <strong>of</strong> his father, made twenty years before,-''<br />
that dogs should be used <strong>in</strong> the pursuit<br />
<strong>of</strong> Indians. Another twenty years passed, however,<br />
before the suggestion was carried <strong>in</strong>to effect <strong>in</strong> this vic<strong>in</strong>i-<br />
ty. In a letter dated <strong>Northampton</strong>, March 37'", 1724, Col.<br />
Stoddard writes —<br />
:<br />
"If the Indians do not jo<strong>in</strong> us shortly, it will be best that a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> good dogs be provided, which I hope may near as well answer our<br />
design, for I th<strong>in</strong>k they mnj be <strong>in</strong>structed to pursue an enemy, and if<br />
they should kill an Indian it will more effectually prevent their com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
than the kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 20 <strong>in</strong> any other way."<br />
Fort Duuimer was an outpost, headquarters<br />
Indians to Serve <strong>in</strong><br />
the Fort. <strong>of</strong> observation, <strong>from</strong> which scout<strong>in</strong>g parties<br />
were sent <strong>in</strong> all directions, and as Indians<br />
were thought to be expert <strong>in</strong> such Inis<strong>in</strong>ess, an attempt was<br />
made to engage them for service there. Capt. Kellogg was<br />
sent to Albany to enlist them, but few only were obta<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />
and those who were employed were careful to absent 1 hem-<br />
selves when any fight<strong>in</strong>g was to be done.<br />
1 Vol. 1. p. 496.<br />
2 Daniel Dwight was the third son <strong>of</strong> Nathaniel Dwight <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, and was<br />
afterwards a m<strong>in</strong>ister at Charlestown, S. C.<br />
3 Vol. 1. p. 477.