13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1782.] REVOLUTION—ARMY SUPPLIES—SAMUEL ELY. 453<br />

the front. In too many cases the specious reason<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

these unpr<strong>in</strong>cipled leaders <strong>in</strong>volved their followers <strong>in</strong> a<br />

conflict with the law, under the pretense that they were<br />

obey<strong>in</strong>g the mandates <strong>of</strong> the people as set forth <strong>in</strong> these<br />

conventions. Everybody was <strong>in</strong> debt to everybody else,<br />

taxes were heavy, money scarce, and <strong>in</strong>dustry at a standstill.<br />

To escape the payment <strong>of</strong> their obligations was the<br />

end and aim <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> this agitation. People had noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to pay with and knew not where to obta<strong>in</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Hence all the mach<strong>in</strong>ery <strong>of</strong> law that <strong>in</strong> better times protected<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess and upheld government, was considered a<br />

grievance. The courts were opposed because they were<br />

used to enforce the collection <strong>of</strong> debts and taxes. Lawyers<br />

were especially obnoxious, because, under the sanction <strong>of</strong><br />

the courts, they compelled payments. The truth was that,<br />

<strong>in</strong> the language <strong>of</strong> an observer <strong>of</strong> the times, the "Government<br />

was endangered by the noise <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> debt." ^<br />

Convention at<br />

Hadiey.<br />

The first couventiou <strong>of</strong> the year Avas held at<br />

Hadley, about the ll"" <strong>of</strong> February. No<br />

representatives were present <strong>from</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong><br />

or Southampton. Little is known respect<strong>in</strong>g it,<br />

but apparently it was managed by the reformers. Its<br />

records have disappeared, but <strong>its</strong> action was characterized<br />

at that time as hav<strong>in</strong>g been " ill done," and a " scandal to<br />

the county. "2 A petition was prepared and presented to<br />

the Legislature which was referred to a committee, but was<br />

never reported upon. Consequentlj'", <strong>in</strong> the succeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

month another convention was held at Hatfield, the proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>of</strong> which will be noted hereafter. A more con-<br />

servative class <strong>of</strong> delegates was chosen to this body, and <strong>its</strong><br />

action was much less objectionable. It was undoubtedly<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the part he took <strong>in</strong> the Hadley meet<strong>in</strong>g, as well<br />

as for his utterances <strong>in</strong> different towns <strong>in</strong> the county, that<br />

Samuel Ely, who subsequently figured quite prom<strong>in</strong>ently,<br />

was arraigned before Major Hawley February l-i**", to be<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed for "treasonable practices." He seems to have<br />

escaped with but slight, if any, punishment at this time,<br />

but abated noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> his treasonable work.<br />

1 Judd's Diary.<br />

2 Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!