13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1723.<br />

an eiiem5\ Authorized l)y tlie Legislature on the 37''' <strong>of</strong><br />

December, 1733, it was built on " Equivalent Lands" <strong>in</strong> the<br />

town <strong>of</strong> Brattleboro, on the west bank <strong>of</strong> the Connecticut<br />

Biver, on what is now known as "Brooks Farm,"^ Col.<br />

Stoddard was ordered to super<strong>in</strong>tend the build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fort. In Februarj^ 1734, he writes that he had committed<br />

the work to Lieut. Timothy Dwight <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, who<br />

had under him a detail <strong>of</strong> "'4 carpenters, 12 soldiers with<br />

narrow axes, and 3 teams." The structure was built <strong>of</strong><br />

yellow jmie logs, hewn and laid up after the manner <strong>of</strong> an<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary log house. This blockhouse was about one hundred<br />

eighty feet square, houses be<strong>in</strong>g built aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

walls, leav<strong>in</strong>g the center open and unobstructed, for a<br />

parade-ground.<br />

Opposition to the Allusious <strong>in</strong> the correspondence <strong>of</strong> Col.<br />

Buiidiug <strong>of</strong> the Stoddarcl, <strong>in</strong>dicate that there was consid-<br />

Blockhouse. ,1 ... • -\t j.n j. •£ x •<br />

erable opposition m JMorthampton, it not <strong>in</strong><br />

other places, to the establishment <strong>of</strong> this fort. In Novem-<br />

ber, Col. Stoddard writes, " Many f<strong>in</strong>d fault with it (the<br />

blockhouse), some out <strong>of</strong> ignorance, and more out <strong>of</strong> per-<br />

verseiiess." The op]iosition, however, amounted to but little,<br />

and was not long cont<strong>in</strong>ued. It had some effect upon<br />

the political fortunes <strong>of</strong> Col. Stoddard, and contributed<br />

largely to his defeat <strong>in</strong> the contest for representative <strong>in</strong> that<br />

year, though dissatisfaction with the Sewer Commission,<br />

already noted, ^ had perhaps as great an <strong>in</strong>fluence. The<br />

fort was <strong>of</strong> great value dur<strong>in</strong>g the war, and served an ex-<br />

cellent purpose. Col. Stoddard frequently alludes to <strong>its</strong><br />

utility. Writ<strong>in</strong>g to Gov. Dummer, <strong>in</strong> August, he says —<br />

:<br />

'<br />

' No party <strong>of</strong> the enemy hath passed the fort without be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

discovered, which has been the means <strong>of</strong> preserv<strong>in</strong>g many<br />

lives." For some time after <strong>its</strong> erection it was known as<br />

the ''Blockhouse," but was afterwards named "Fort<br />

Dummer," by Capt. Dwight, <strong>in</strong> honor <strong>of</strong> the then act<strong>in</strong>g-<br />

Governor <strong>of</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Capt. Dwight. with a company<br />

<strong>of</strong> fifty-five men, held command <strong>of</strong> the fort dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

war. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to his report, <strong>its</strong> cost <strong>in</strong> labor and mate-<br />

rials was £356.4.1.<br />

1 Sheldon's <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Deerflekl, vol. 1, p. 407.<br />

2 Vol. 1, p. 521.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!