History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
324 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. 11766. The Town Undecided. Evidently the town, divided in sentiment on the question, and unwilling to commit itself upon the issue, selected the best way out of the dilemma, by voting to abide by the decision of its representative. What discussion occurred in the town-meeting, or even what may have been the report of the committee, is not known, as that document has not been preserved. It is possible, judging from the political complexion of the committee, as developed later, that they may have reported in favor of the grant, but against the indemnity. It is not probable that they favored the passage of the bill as a whole, nor that they proposed to put the matter unreservedly into the hands of their representative, as both of these suggestions were voted on independently of their report. The Bill passed by Tliis Committee contained in the persons of the Legislature. Timotliy Dwiglit and Solomon Stoddard, two individuals who were afterwards avowed tories, and one at least of the others is believed to have had strong predilections in that direction. The result, however, was decidedly in favor of the bill, for which Major Hawley had already committed himself. During the debate in the legislature, he made strong opposition to any grant unless accompanied by the indemnity clause. A majority of the towns decided, like Northampton, to abide by the decision of their representatives, and the House voted at first to raise no money for such a purpose by taxation. After further discussion, however, an act substantially in accordance with the proposition sent to the towns, was passed by the House of Deputies, by a majority of eighteen votes. It was concurred in by the Council, and with reluctance signed by the Governor. This act was subsequently annulled by the King, but not before the pro- vision granting compensation had been carried out. Further Strife with Politics camc ouce more to the front in Parliamentary Laws, the year 1768, wlieu the towu was called upon to join in a convention to be held in Boston, for the purpose of consulting upon the position of affairs. A brief summary of the events which led up to
1768.] POLITICAL MATTERS—CENSUS—JAIL—NEW TOWNS. 325 this movement will indicate the critical point which the controversy with the home government liad reached, as well as the conservative position assumed by the town. Feeling in the maritime towns was much more intense than in the interior of the state, and while the citizens of Northampton were ever patriotic and ready to uphold their rights, they were in no haste to follow blindly the lead of the Boston populace, though guided by such men as Otis, Adams and Warren. The repeal of the Stamp Act did not end the struggle to derive revenue from the colonies. A tax was levied on glass, paj^er, painters' colors, and tea, a Board of Customs was established, and writs of assistance legalized. These laws alarmed the people to a much greater extent than did the Stamp Act, and resistance to them was at once determined upon. The citizens of Boston voted in town-meeting to refuse to import certain articles of British manufacture, and to economize in the consumption of many others. Resolutions were passed by the Leg- islature discouraging the use of British manufactured arti- cles, and recommending those of American production. An English war vessel impressed seamen in Boston, and a vessel belonging to John Hancock was seized on charge of defrauding the revenue. Several mass-meetings of the people were held in which Adams and Otis denounced with vigor these acts of their oppressors. The anniversary of the repeal of the Stamp Act was enthusiastically celebrated, but no overt act was committed. While all was excitement and men's passions were at fever heat, instructions were received ordering the Legislature to rescind its antiimportation resolutions. This was refused, and Gov. Barnard prorogued the General Court. Again the merchants of Boston pledged themselves to import no mereliandise from England, excejit such as was absolutely necessary. All but sixteen of them signed tlie agreement, and the arti- cles upon which duties had been imposed were especially prohibited. At a mass-meeting held in Faneuil Hall, in September, it was resolved that "the inlial)itants of Bos- ton will, at the utmost peril of their lives and fortunes, maintain and defend their rights, liberties, privileges and immunities." It was also decided at this meeting to call a convention of all the towns, within two weeks, and the
- Page 306 and 307: 274 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 308 and 309: 276 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 310 and 311: 4.2.6
- Page 312 and 313: 280 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 314 and 315: 282 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 316 and 317: 284 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 318 and 319: 286 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1755.
- Page 320 and 321: 288 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1756.
- Page 322 and 323: 290 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1757.
- Page 324 and 325: 292 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1757.
- Page 326 and 327: 294 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T58.
- Page 328 and 329: 296 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1759.
- Page 330 and 331: 298 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1760.
- Page 332 and 333: CHAPTER XXII. FIRST SCHOOL-COMMITTE
- Page 334 and 335: 302 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1754.
- Page 336 and 337: 304 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. L1756.
- Page 338 and 339: 306 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1759.
- Page 340 and 341: 308 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1760.
- Page 342 and 343: 310 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [I'^SO.
- Page 344 and 345: 313 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1761.
- Page 346 and 347: 314 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1762.
- Page 348 and 349: 316 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. 11764.
- Page 350 and 351: 318 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1767.
- Page 352 and 353: 320 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1767.
- Page 354 and 355: 322 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [ir67.
- Page 358 and 359: 326 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1768.
- Page 360 and 361: 328 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1764.
- Page 362 and 363: 330 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1769.
- Page 364 and 365: 332 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1771-1
- Page 366 and 367: 334 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1770-1
- Page 368 and 369: 336 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1773.
- Page 370 and 371: 338 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1773.
- Page 372 and 373: CHAPTER XXIV. REVOLUTION—PRELIMIN
- Page 374 and 375: 342 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1773-1
- Page 376 and 377: 344 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1774.
- Page 378 and 379: 346 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1774.
- Page 380 and 381: 348 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. L1W4. "
- Page 382 and 383: 350 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1774.
- Page 384 and 385: 352 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1767.
- Page 386 and 387: 354 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1774.
- Page 388 and 389: 356 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1774.
- Page 390 and 391: 358 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. 11775.
- Page 392 and 393: 360 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 394 and 395: 362 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 396 and 397: 364 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 398 and 399: 366 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 400 and 401: 368 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 402 and 403: 370 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
- Page 404 and 405: 372 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1775.
324 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. 11766.<br />
The Town Undecided.<br />
Evidently the town, divided <strong>in</strong> sentiment<br />
on the question, and unwill<strong>in</strong>g to commit<br />
<strong>its</strong>elf upon the issue, selected the best way out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dilemma, by vot<strong>in</strong>g to abide by the decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>its</strong> representative.<br />
What discussion occurred <strong>in</strong> the town-meet<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
or even what may have been the report <strong>of</strong> the committee,<br />
is not known, as that document has not been preserved.<br />
It is possible, judg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>from</strong> the political complexion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
committee, as developed later, that they may have reported<br />
<strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> the grant, but aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>in</strong>demnity. It is<br />
not probable that they favored the passage <strong>of</strong> the bill as<br />
a whole, nor that they proposed to put the matter unreservedly<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the hands <strong>of</strong> their representative, as both <strong>of</strong><br />
these suggestions were voted on <strong>in</strong>dependently <strong>of</strong> their<br />
report.<br />
The Bill passed by Tliis Committee conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the persons <strong>of</strong><br />
the Legislature. Timotliy Dwiglit and Solomon Stoddard,<br />
two <strong>in</strong>dividuals who were afterwards<br />
avowed tories, and one at least <strong>of</strong> the others is believed to<br />
have had strong predilections <strong>in</strong> that direction. The result,<br />
however, was decidedly <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> the bill, for which<br />
Major Hawley had already committed himself. Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the debate <strong>in</strong> the legislature, he made strong opposition to<br />
any grant unless accompanied by the <strong>in</strong>demnity clause.<br />
A majority <strong>of</strong> the towns decided, like <strong>Northampton</strong>, to<br />
abide by the decision <strong>of</strong> their representatives, and the<br />
House voted at first to raise no money for such a purpose<br />
by taxation. After further discussion, however, an act<br />
substantially <strong>in</strong> accordance with the proposition sent to the<br />
towns, was passed by the House <strong>of</strong> Deputies, by a majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> eighteen votes. It was concurred <strong>in</strong> by the Council, and<br />
with reluctance signed by the Governor. This act was<br />
subsequently annulled by the K<strong>in</strong>g, but not before the pro-<br />
vision grant<strong>in</strong>g compensation had been carried out.<br />
Further Strife with Politics camc ouce more to the front <strong>in</strong><br />
Parliamentary Laws, the year 1768, wlieu the towu was called<br />
upon to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a convention to be held <strong>in</strong><br />
Boston, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> consult<strong>in</strong>g upon the position <strong>of</strong><br />
affairs. A brief summary <strong>of</strong> the events which led up to