History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

13.08.2013 Views

313 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1761. Disputed Land in A Special meeting was called to inquire into Middle Meadow. \;]^q ownership of Certain lands in Middle Meadow. A committee reported that a considerable part of them belonged to the town. Thereupon a vote was passed to make the title good. From this action grew a long drawn out law suit, which was not settled till 1764, and then matters seem to have been left about as they were when the suit was commenced. Apparently a test case was made with the heirs of Jonathan Hunt, and in the course of a couple of years the town expended not far from £88 in the litigation. Northampton lost the case be- fore the lower court, and appealed to the Superior Court. In 17fi4, the town decided that it " would become non suit if the Hunts would agree to be defaulted." Appar- ently both sides were ready to compromise on that basis, for at the September session of the higher court neither party put in an appearance. Attempt to make Hardly had the new County of Berkshire Northampton the been established, when a movement was "^^ commenced to make Northampton the shiretown of Old Hampshire, instead of Springfield. A peti- tion signed by Timothy Dwiglit of Northampton and Oliver Partridge of Hatfield, in which it was claimed that Northampton was much more central than Springfield, was presented to the Legislature in April, 1761. Northampton suj)plemented this petition by another in the following May, instructing a committee to "procure & Send Some proper person an Agent to Boston to prosecute the aff'air." Col. Timothy Dwight was delegated to perform this duty, and there remains on file an order on the town treasurer, signed by the three selectmen to pay him "three £ and seven pence one fifth part of a penny in full satisfaction for the like sum paid at Boston by him in and about the affair of the town of Northampton's application to the Genl Court to be constituted the Shire Town of the county of Hampshire." Some towns in the northern part of the county petitioned in favor of Northampton, and others in favor of Hadley, while those in the southern portion opposed any change. In January of the following year, twenty-one towns in the northern half of the county peti-

1701] FIRST SCHOOL-COMMITTEE—NEW COURT-HOUSE. 313 tioned that the shire-town sliould be either Northampton or Had ley, as the General Court should see fit. ^ Both petitions were dismissed in February, 176::^, and Northampton did not attain the coveted honor till the second division of the county was made in 1812. Sabbath Wardens Either disordcr in the meeting-house inchosen. creased considerably or there were not tith- ing-men enough chosen to preserve order, for in 1761, four men were selected especially to preserve order in the meeting-house on Sunday. They were called "Sabbath Wardens," and for about eighteen years were chosen annually with other town officers. They were subsequently ordered to procure badges of office similar to those carried by tithing-men. In 1764, the town by vote, required the tithing-men and wardens to sit by turns, in some public place in the galleries, to prevent disturbances, and to enforce the law for preserving order in the meetinghouse. New School Proposed Towu scliools Were Overflowing with puover Mill River. pi]g^ j^^d it was determined in 1761 to establish a new school on the south side of Mill River. The selectmen were instructed first to take the " Lickingwater " boys out of the town school, and if one master could " advantageously instruct those that remained in the English school, to set up a school on that side of the river provided the Parents and Masters of the boys there will procure a room and wood to support it. Provision was also made that boys from other parts of the town should be sent there. It is not probable that another school was " set up" in South Street at this time. As was the case two years before, no additional teachers seem to have been employed, and it may be inferred that the " Parents and Masters " were unwilling to provide a schoolroom and fuel as well as pupils. 1 In discussing this subject, Col. Williams of Hatfield is said to have observed : — "The people of Ilatfleld are industrious and thrivius. and to have the courts there would injure their industry and thrift. Northanipton people are very religious and the measure would be injurious to their religion, but Hadley has neither thrift nor morality to be injured." Hadley was then and long afterwards greatly demoralized by hard drinking. "

313 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1761.<br />

Disputed Land <strong>in</strong> A Special meet<strong>in</strong>g was called to <strong>in</strong>quire <strong>in</strong>to<br />

Middle Meadow. \;]^q ownership <strong>of</strong> Certa<strong>in</strong> lands <strong>in</strong> Middle<br />

Meadow. A committee reported that a considerable<br />

part <strong>of</strong> them belonged to the town. Thereupon<br />

a vote was passed to make the title good. From this action<br />

grew a long drawn out law suit, which was not settled till<br />

1764, and then matters seem to have been left about as they<br />

were when the suit was commenced. Apparently a test<br />

case was made with the heirs <strong>of</strong> Jonathan Hunt, and <strong>in</strong><br />

the course <strong>of</strong> a couple <strong>of</strong> years the town expended not far<br />

<strong>from</strong> £88 <strong>in</strong> the litigation. <strong>Northampton</strong> lost the case be-<br />

fore the lower court, and appealed to the Superior Court.<br />

In 17fi4, the town decided that it " would become non<br />

suit if the Hunts would agree to be defaulted." Appar-<br />

ently both sides were ready to compromise on that basis,<br />

for at the September session <strong>of</strong> the higher court neither<br />

party put <strong>in</strong> an appearance.<br />

Attempt to make Hardly had the new County <strong>of</strong> Berkshire<br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> the been established, when a movement was<br />

"^^<br />

commenced to make <strong>Northampton</strong> the shiretown<br />

<strong>of</strong> Old Hampshire, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield. A peti-<br />

tion signed by Timothy Dwiglit <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> and Oliver<br />

Partridge <strong>of</strong> Hatfield, <strong>in</strong> which it was claimed that<br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> was much more central than Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, was<br />

presented to the Legislature <strong>in</strong> April, 1761. <strong>Northampton</strong><br />

suj)plemented this petition by another <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

May, <strong>in</strong>struct<strong>in</strong>g a committee to "procure & Send Some<br />

proper person an Agent to Boston to prosecute the aff'air."<br />

Col. Timothy Dwight was delegated to perform this duty,<br />

and there rema<strong>in</strong>s on file an order on the town treasurer,<br />

signed by the three selectmen to pay him "three £ and<br />

seven pence one fifth part <strong>of</strong> a penny <strong>in</strong> full satisfaction for<br />

the like sum paid at Boston by him <strong>in</strong> and about the affair<br />

<strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>'s application to the Genl<br />

Court to be constituted the Shire Town <strong>of</strong> the county <strong>of</strong><br />

Hampshire." Some towns <strong>in</strong> the northern part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

county petitioned <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong>, and others <strong>in</strong><br />

favor <strong>of</strong> Hadley, while those <strong>in</strong> the southern portion opposed<br />

any change. In January <strong>of</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g year,<br />

twenty-one towns <strong>in</strong> the northern half <strong>of</strong> the county peti-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!