History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

13.08.2013 Views

248 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1754. Militia of Northern A Complete reorganization of tlie militia Hampshire Reor- Qf Hampshire County was entered npon ^^^^'^^ this year. Joseph Hawley of Northampton and Elijah Williams of Deerfield were promoted to the rank of major at about the same time by Gov. Shirley, and the former became quite active in the formation of the new companies. Apparently there was to be a muster and a reorganization of the regiment in the northern part of Hampshire County, and on the IG"' of August Major Hawley wrote to Col. Israel Williams about the officers of the Northampton companies. He proposed the following names — : His own Co. 20 Co. 3i Co. Lt. Gideon Lyman Capt. [John] Hunt Capt. Benj. Sheldon Lt. William Lyman Lt. Ebenezer Hunt Lt. [Eben] Kingsley Ens. Nathaniel Clark Ens. Josiah Pomeroy Ens. Dan'l Pomeroy Hc meutious a Capt. Wright, who proba- Major Hawiey's suggestions. IqIj belonged to the first company, who it was expected would refuse his former commission. If Capt. Wright declined, the companies were to be officered as above, but Wright and Gideon Lyman would not serve together, or one under the other. Should both decline, then he suggested that Lieut. William Lyman should be made captain, and Josiah Pomeroy lieutenant of the first company, Daniel Pomeroy, ensign of the second company, and Jonathan Strong Jr., ensign of the third company. His brother Elisha, he thought in case of the failure of one of the above officers, would be a better lieutenant than Lieut, Caleb Strong, as he had done much more to merit the position. It is not probable that any companies were officered at that time in just the manner proposed by Major Hawley, though several of the persons named served in the expedition against Crown Point, and some of them were killed. Indignant at the manner in which his suggestions had been received by his commanding officers. Major Hawley on the 8'' of October addressed a pungent letter to Col. Williams, plainly intimating his dissatisfaction at the snub inflicted upon him. In it he suggests that Col. Israel Williams, Col. Oliver Partridge, Major Ephraim Williams, and himself, should confer upon military affairs " for y*" defence of our people on y'' west of

1754] FOURTH FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR. 249 Connecticut river." He complains that Col Israel and Major Ephraim concert such schemes as they "think proper, and labour it with y'" Governour, and he also with y*" whole court," while "Col. Partridge schemes something different perhaps, which he Avill labour with ye Governour and House. I am privy to neither scheme, and perhaps y" first of my hearing thereof should be in y*' House." He says " I don't think y* in my private capacity I am of much importance in such matters, but as a member of y*^ House it is possible I may be, for I have always spoke my mind in y'' House and sometimes have been heard." ^ Major Israel Williams and Major Hawley were cousins, and as nothing further has come to light, it is presumed that neither party pressed the quarrel to the point of interference with the best interests of the service. In November Major Hawley was appointed on a committee in connection with Major Elijah Williams and Capt. Timothy Ruggles to disburse money in building and repairing forts on the frontier west of Connecticut River. In the above proposed list of officers Major Hawley claims one of the companies as his own, but there is no proof that he ever entered the field. Indeed in July of the succeeding year, after news came of the disaster at Hoosack, he gives two reasons for not volunteering. They were as follows: — "one is that the weather is so extream hot that it would instantly bringon y*" disorder to which I am incident in hot weather," and the other was the "hurrying time in y" business of my profession." 2 From evidence thus far obtained, it seems that Major Hawley passed from the rank of chaplain at Louisburg in 1745, to that of major in 1754, without ever having taken part in anything more hazardous than an occasional scouting expedition, yet he took a prominent part in the organization of the Hampshire County Regiments, as will hereafter be noted. Activity Everywhere. All the forts ou the frontiers were garrisoned in 1755, and scouting parties were constantly on the move. Indians hovered about in every direction. Attacks were made upon fortified places in New 1 Perry's Williamstown, pp. 267, 268. 2 lb., p. 208.

248 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1754.<br />

Militia <strong>of</strong> Northern A Complete reorganization <strong>of</strong> tlie militia<br />

Hampshire Reor- Qf Hampshire County was entered npon<br />

^^^^'^^<br />

this year. Joseph Hawley <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong><br />

and Elijah Williams <strong>of</strong> Deerfield were promoted to the<br />

rank <strong>of</strong> major at about the same time by Gov. Shirley, and<br />

the former became quite active <strong>in</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

companies. Apparently there was to be a muster and a reorganization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the regiment <strong>in</strong> the northern part <strong>of</strong><br />

Hampshire County, and on the IG"' <strong>of</strong> August Major Hawley<br />

wrote to Col. Israel Williams about the <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Northampton</strong> companies. He proposed the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

names —<br />

:<br />

His own Co. 20 Co. 3i Co.<br />

Lt. Gideon Lyman Capt. [John] Hunt Capt. Benj. Sheldon<br />

Lt. William Lyman Lt. Ebenezer Hunt Lt. [Eben] K<strong>in</strong>gsley<br />

Ens. Nathaniel Clark Ens. Josiah Pomeroy Ens. Dan'l Pomeroy<br />

Hc meutious a Capt. Wright, who proba-<br />

Major Hawiey's suggestions.<br />

IqIj belonged to the first company, who it<br />

was expected would refuse his former commission.<br />

If Capt. Wright decl<strong>in</strong>ed, the companies were<br />

to be <strong>of</strong>ficered as above, but Wright and Gideon Lyman<br />

would not serve together, or one under the other.<br />

Should both decl<strong>in</strong>e, then he suggested that Lieut. William<br />

Lyman should be made capta<strong>in</strong>, and Josiah Pomeroy lieutenant<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first company, Daniel Pomeroy, ensign <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second company, and Jonathan Strong Jr., ensign <strong>of</strong> the<br />

third company. His brother Elisha, he thought <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

the failure <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the above <strong>of</strong>ficers, would be a better<br />

lieutenant than Lieut, Caleb Strong, as he had done much<br />

more to merit the position. It is not probable that any<br />

companies were <strong>of</strong>ficered at that time <strong>in</strong> just the manner<br />

proposed by Major Hawley, though several <strong>of</strong> the persons<br />

named served <strong>in</strong> the expedition aga<strong>in</strong>st Crown Po<strong>in</strong>t, and<br />

some <strong>of</strong> them were killed. Indignant at the manner <strong>in</strong><br />

which his suggestions had been received by his command<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers. Major Hawley on the 8'' <strong>of</strong> October addressed<br />

a pungent letter to Col. Williams, pla<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>timat<strong>in</strong>g his<br />

dissatisfaction at the snub <strong>in</strong>flicted upon him. In it he<br />

suggests that Col. Israel Williams, Col. Oliver Partridge,<br />

Major Ephraim Williams, and himself, should confer upon<br />

military affairs " for y*" defence <strong>of</strong> our people on y'' west <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!