13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1749.<br />

vocate the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples set fortli <strong>in</strong> liis book, lie ought not to<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> pastor <strong>of</strong> the church ; that the bus<strong>in</strong>ess proposed<br />

whether the church<br />

to the advisory council should be — :<br />

should take any longer time to peruse Mr. Edwards' book ;<br />

Avhether the church, consider<strong>in</strong>g the great opposition to<br />

Mr. Edwards, both <strong>in</strong> church and prec<strong>in</strong>ct, should not use<br />

means for an immediate separation ; and if so what measures<br />

should be taken to that end. The committee also prepared<br />

a vote to be <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong> the church meet<strong>in</strong>g, propos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that steps should be taken for an immediate dissolution <strong>of</strong><br />

the pastoral relation, <strong>in</strong> case Mr. Edwards refused to accede<br />

to their views.<br />

Mr. Edwards Re- To these suggcstious Mr. Edwards promptly<br />

fuses to Accept demurred. He replied at great length <strong>in</strong> a<br />

these Proposi- .<br />

3 j. xi x •<br />

tions. communication addressed to tlie meet<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g up each topic separately, show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

their <strong>in</strong>consistency with one another, and tlieir unfairness<br />

to him. He charged the committee with arrang<strong>in</strong>g beforehand<br />

what was to be done, and conf<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the action <strong>of</strong> the<br />

council solely to that decision, and he suggested that hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

provided beforehand a verdict for the council, it was<br />

superfluous to call one. He took the ground that the<br />

church might possibly differ <strong>in</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>from</strong> the prec<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

(los<strong>in</strong>g sight <strong>of</strong> the fact that the same men co<strong>in</strong>joosed both<br />

bodies, and had the power to carry out <strong>in</strong> one organization<br />

what they formulated <strong>in</strong> the other). Most strongly he objected<br />

to the determ<strong>in</strong>ation to conf<strong>in</strong>e the council to members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Hampshire County churches, because nearly<br />

all <strong>of</strong> them were <strong>in</strong> sympathy with his op]3onei<strong>its</strong>. He<br />

charged them with endeavor<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>fluence him by the<br />

threat <strong>of</strong> recommend<strong>in</strong>g an immediate dismissal unless he<br />

assented to their views. Undoubtedly this reply <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pastor was irritat<strong>in</strong>g and provok<strong>in</strong>g. It conta<strong>in</strong>ed some<br />

thrusts that the committee could not well parry. The<br />

effect was pla<strong>in</strong>ly noticeable at the next meet<strong>in</strong>g with him.<br />

Auotiier Meet<strong>in</strong>g. At the iiext coiifereuce with the pastor<br />

stroug Language, tlierc was Considerable excitement, and<br />

Major Pomeroy spoke pla<strong>in</strong>ly. It was the<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the committee, he said, that the church had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!