History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

13.08.2013 Views

114 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745. tion." Enlistments were speedily effected, and tlie army was gathered and embarked in less than two months. Sev- eral companies were raised in Hampshire County, two sailing with the first fleet, and another going later when reinforcements were forwarded. In February, Seth Pomeroy of Northampton (then Major), as Col. Stoddard says, was " beating up for men in the upper part of the county," and in a short time he had enlisted a company of fifty men, though Stoddard says that he was "provoked (when we mustered) to see how few appeared after so much pretension to List." In this company were fifteen men from Northampton, nine from Hatfield, six from Deerfield, three from Hadley, two from Northfield, and twelve whose resi- dence cannot now be determined. To make up the number named above, three names are wanting ; undoubtedly they failed to pass muster. Hampshire County The 4"' Massachusetts Regiment, to which Officers. the Hampshire Company enlisted in this section was attached, was commanded by Col. Samuel Willard ; Seth Pomeroy held the office of Major as well as that of Captain of the 3'^ company ; Thomas Chandler was Lieut. -Colonel and Captain of the 2*^ company. Gen. Joseph Dwight of Brookfield was ap- pointed Brigadier-General and had command of the 9'^'^ Regiment. He was Colonel of a train of artillery, of which Joseph Hawley^ of Northampton was Chaplain.^ Another company enlisted from the frontier garrisons by Capt. William Williams, which was sent to reinforce the army, but did not arrive till the city had surrendered, contained the names of a number of Northampton men on its muster- roll. An Anti-Catholic Relieved by the people to be mainly anticrusade. Catliolic in its design, the expedition was regarded as under the especial protection of Providence. Hence in every hamlet and town prayers were constantly offered in its behalf. Northampton was not behindhand in this pious fervor, nor were her soldiers 1 Perry's Williamstown, p. 94. 2 Mr. Hawley's commission as Chaplain is dated March 23, 1744.

1745.1 KING George's french and Indian war. 115 left in ignorance of the fact. Mary Pomeroy in a letter to her lnisl)and. dated May 27"', says : "The whole town is much moved with concern for the expedition, how Providence will order the affair, for which religious meetings every week in town are maintained." Under date of June 11"', Ebenezer Pomeroy, father of Major Seth, writes : — "I would inform you and j'our soldiers that God in his Providence has stirred up a remarkable spirit of prayer in this city, for victory in this grand expedition and I hear also throughout the land, for in this town the parents and some other relatives of those gone in the expedition, have constantly set apart some time every week to pray to God for success in this grand affair and we have good reason to believe that it hath not been in vain ; for God hath in a very remarkable manner smiled upon the fleet and army." Major Pomeroy's The Company of Major Pomeroy was Company. crowded into the small fishing vessels, nine- ty of which were required to transport the troops. On the 24"' of March, the fleet set sail from Nan- tasket roads and soon encountered a severe storm, with the usual consequences to landsmen. But though they weathered the storm in safety, the fleet was scattered. After buffeting the waves for nearly two weeks, narrowly escaping shipwreck, the little vessels containing the Hampshire soldiers entered the harbor of Canseau, about fifty miles from Louisburg, where they found a number of transports belonging to the expedition, at anchor. Here in a few days the entire fleet was concentrated, and here it was com- pelled to remain till the last of April, waiting for the ice to break up in the harbor of Louisburg. The Voyage of the Concerning the voyage of Major Pomeroy Hampshire Comj^j^(^^ ;[jjg company, the commander in his ^''"^' first home letter, dated April 6"', gives the annexed account, by which it will be seen that the major, whatever may have been the case with the soldiers, had a very severe attack of seasickness : — "Yesterday arrived safe at camp, which was the 14"' day since we embarked and 13 of the days sea sick in the highest degree, 24 hours often without one mouthful of meat. * * * All strong drink, the smell of which was more than I could bear, was an abomination to me, and if any body ever died with sea sickness I believe I should if it had continued a little while longer. We are now in a good harbour and I

114 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.<br />

tion." Enlistments were speedily effected, and tlie army<br />

was gathered and embarked <strong>in</strong> less than two months. Sev-<br />

eral companies were raised <strong>in</strong> Hampshire County, two sail<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with the first fleet, and another go<strong>in</strong>g later when re<strong>in</strong>forcements<br />

were forwarded. In February, Seth Pomeroy<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> (then Major), as Col. Stoddard says, was<br />

" beat<strong>in</strong>g up for men <strong>in</strong> the upper part <strong>of</strong> the county," and<br />

<strong>in</strong> a short time he had enlisted a company <strong>of</strong> fifty men,<br />

though Stoddard says that he was "provoked (when we<br />

mustered) to see how few appeared after so much pretension<br />

to List." In this company were fifteen men <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>Northampton</strong>, n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>from</strong> Hatfield, six <strong>from</strong> Deerfield, three<br />

<strong>from</strong> Hadley, two <strong>from</strong> Northfield, and twelve whose resi-<br />

dence cannot now be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. To make up the number<br />

named above, three names are want<strong>in</strong>g ;<br />

undoubtedly<br />

they failed to pass muster.<br />

Hampshire County The 4"' <strong>Massachusetts</strong> Regiment, to which<br />

Officers. the Hampshire Company enlisted <strong>in</strong> this<br />

section was attached, was commanded by<br />

Col. Samuel Willard ; Seth Pomeroy held the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong><br />

Major as well as that <strong>of</strong> Capta<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 3'^ company ;<br />

Thomas Chandler was Lieut. -Colonel and Capta<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

2*^ company. Gen. Joseph Dwight <strong>of</strong> Brookfield was ap-<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ted Brigadier-General and had command <strong>of</strong> the 9'^'^<br />

Regiment. He was Colonel <strong>of</strong> a tra<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> artillery, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

Joseph Hawley^ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> was Chapla<strong>in</strong>.^ Another<br />

company enlisted <strong>from</strong> the frontier garrisons by Capt. William<br />

Williams, which was sent to re<strong>in</strong>force the army, but<br />

did not arrive till the city had surrendered, conta<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />

names <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>Northampton</strong> men on <strong>its</strong> muster-<br />

roll.<br />

An Anti-Catholic Relieved by the people to be ma<strong>in</strong>ly anticrusade.<br />

Catliolic <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> design, the expedition was<br />

regarded as under the especial protection <strong>of</strong><br />

Providence. Hence <strong>in</strong> every hamlet and town prayers<br />

were constantly <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong> <strong>its</strong> behalf. <strong>Northampton</strong> was<br />

not beh<strong>in</strong>dhand <strong>in</strong> this pious fervor, nor were her soldiers<br />

1 Perry's Williamstown, p. 94.<br />

2 Mr. Hawley's commission as Chapla<strong>in</strong> is dated March 23, 1744.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!