History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654; History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;
104 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1744. Capt. Pomeroy, however, commanded a company the next year, but its field of operations was remote from Massa- chusetts. A Commission on De- When War became a certainty, additional fences Appointed. methods of defence were provided by the authorities, designed more especially to command the customary lines of Indian travel across the frontiers, from the northward. It was decided to establish a series of forts, about five and a half miles distant from each other, westward to the boundaries of New York. A commission consisting of Col. Stoddard, Col. Partridge, and John Leonard, was appointed to carry these orders into efi:ect. Col. Stoddard was the working man of the commission, and under his supervision, the fortifications were designed, located and built. Fortifications Con- Fort Dumuier, erected in 1724, by Lieut. structed. Tiuiothy Dwiglit of Northampton, having been thoroughly repaired after its destruction by fire,^ was now more formidable than ever. In order to carry out tlie intentions of this commission it was necessary first to establish a military line on which to erect the blockhouses. Early in July, Lieut. Timothy Dwight, now Col. Dwiglit, was instructed to survey a line in accordance with general orders, " from Colrain to the Dutch set- tlements." This was promptly done, and on the 34'*' of the month, orders were issued to Capt. William Williams of Hatfield, for the erection of a fort in the town of Heath, which was named Fort Shirley, in honor of the Governor of the Province. Another fort was built in the town of Rowe, and named Fort Pelham, but it was not completed 1 Ou the 15"' of January, 1738, 9 o'clock at night, fire broke out in the room adjoining the magazine at Fort Dummer, and Capt. Kellogg, fearing the fire would soon reach the powder, ordered all the people'immediately to leave the fort (after trying in vain to put out the fire), before his orders could be executed the powder blew up and scattered the fire all over the fort, and in a short time it was all consumed, with the stores of war, goods for the Indian trade, and all that belonged to the officers and soldiers, except the clothes they had ou. Loss from £6,000 to £T,(XX)."— Boston Evening Post, 1738. The fort was probably rebuilt by Capt. Kellogg the ensuing year. It was commanded by Capt. Josiah Willard in 1740, who complained that it was in a " defenceless condition." He says that the garrison will put things in a posture for defence and erect two bastions if government will allow him a carpenter and provide nails, iron and boards. These bastions were built in 1741, and a line of pickets twenty feet high, set around the fort.
1744.J KING George's french and Indian war. 105 till the following spring. During that summer a third fortification was erected in the town of Adams, beyond Hoosack mountain, and named Fort Massachusetts. This finished the line of defenses ordered and paid for by the Province. Other means of safety were adopted, and houses were fortified and mounts built in Vernon, Bernardston, Colrain, Charlemont and Charlestown. West of the mountain similar works were constructed at Pittsfield, Stockbridge, and Sheffield. These were built, some at private cost, and others by the towns in which they were sit- uated. Generally the town fortifications were used as places of refuge for the inhabitants in times of sudden assault. In cases of imminent danger they were garrisoned by the Province troops or volunteers paid by the government. commauding offl- Col. Joliu Stoddard succeeded to the comcers in Ham p- maud in this county, on the death of Col. oun y. Samuel Partridge, which occurred in 1740. He also had charge of the frontier defenses. Capt. Ephraim Williams of Hatfield, was entrusted with the oversight of the western line of fortifications, with headquar- ters at Fort Massachusetts, and Major Israel Williams of Hatfield, was appointed commissary of the Western Department. Soldiers and Dogs were Enlisted, Five hundred soldiers were ordered to be raised iu 1744, two hundred of whom were occu'tred!*^ '°^ to be scut to the western frontiers. Con- stant scouting was carried on from the forts, under the supervision of Capt. Williams. Dogs were pressed into the service, and accompanied many of the scouting parties, but evidently they did not accomplish all that was anticipated. Abundant signs of the enemy were discovered, but no collision occurred, and no assault was made by the Indians in this section. It is not known that any Northampton men were engaged in this campaign. Undoubtedly some of them enlisted, and were employed in the duties already named, but no company from this town appears among the muster-rolls. During the year both sides were engaged in preparations for the conflict. The burden of building the fortifications and scouting fell upon
- Page 85 and 86: 1728.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 57 pr
- Page 87 and 88: 1"28.] REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 59 an
- Page 89 and 90: 1728.1 REV, SOLOMON STODDARD. 61 Pu
- Page 91 and 92: 1728.1 REV. SOLOMON STODDARD. 63 Re
- Page 94: KAC-SIMILE OF SOLOMON STODDARD'S SE
- Page 98 and 99: 66 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1728. o
- Page 100 and 101: 68 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1735. (
- Page 102 and 103: 70 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1736. T
- Page 104 and 105: 72 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. f
- Page 106 and 107: 74 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. a
- Page 108 and 109: 76 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [ITS?. w
- Page 110 and 111: 78 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1737. t
- Page 112 and 113: 80 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T35. a
- Page 114 and 115: 82 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1735. P
- Page 116 and 117: 84 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1736. i
- Page 118 and 119: 86 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1738. y
- Page 120 and 121: 88 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1738. m
- Page 122 and 123: 90 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. l1"39. w
- Page 124 and 125: 92 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. t
- Page 126 and 127: 94 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. "
- Page 128 and 129: 96 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1754. m
- Page 130 and 131: 98 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1743. t
- Page 132 and 133: 100 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T45.
- Page 134 and 135: CHAPTER IX. KING GEORGE'S FRENCH AN
- Page 138 and 139: 106 HISTORY OP NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 140 and 141: 108 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1746.
- Page 142 and 143: 110 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T45.
- Page 144 and 145: CHAPTER X. KING GEORGE S FRENCH AND
- Page 146 and 147: 114 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 148 and 149: 116 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 150 and 151: 118 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 152 and 153: 120 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 154 and 155: VZ2 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 156 and 157: 124 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1745.
- Page 158 and 159: 126 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 160 and 161: 128 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 162 and 163: 130 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 164 and 165: 132 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 166 and 167: 134 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1T45.
- Page 168 and 169: 136 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 170 and 171: 138 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 172 and 173: 140 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 174 and 175: 142 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 176 and 177: 144 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 178 and 179: 146 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1745.
- Page 180 and 181: 148 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON, [1746.
- Page 182 and 183: 150 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [l'^4f?
- Page 184 and 185: 152 HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTON. [1747.
1744.J KING George's french and Indian war. 105<br />
till the follow<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g. Dur<strong>in</strong>g that summer a third<br />
fortification was erected <strong>in</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Adams, beyond<br />
Hoosack mounta<strong>in</strong>, and named Fort <strong>Massachusetts</strong>. This<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ished the l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> defenses ordered and paid for by the<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Other means <strong>of</strong> safety were adopted, and houses<br />
were fortified and mounts built <strong>in</strong> Vernon, Bernardston,<br />
Colra<strong>in</strong>, Charlemont and Charlestown. West <strong>of</strong> the mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
similar works were constructed at Pittsfield, Stockbridge,<br />
and Sheffield. These were built, some at private<br />
cost, and others by the towns <strong>in</strong> which they were sit-<br />
uated. Generally the town fortifications were used as<br />
places <strong>of</strong> refuge for the <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> times <strong>of</strong> sudden<br />
assault. In cases <strong>of</strong> imm<strong>in</strong>ent danger they were garrisoned<br />
by the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce troops or volunteers paid by the government.<br />
commaud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fl- Col. Joliu Stoddard succeeded to the comcers<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ham p- maud <strong>in</strong> this county, on the death <strong>of</strong> Col.<br />
oun y.<br />
Samuel Partridge, which occurred <strong>in</strong> 1740.<br />
He also had charge <strong>of</strong> the frontier defenses. Capt. Ephraim<br />
Williams <strong>of</strong> Hatfield, was entrusted with the oversight<br />
<strong>of</strong> the western l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fortifications, with headquar-<br />
ters at Fort <strong>Massachusetts</strong>, and Major Israel Williams <strong>of</strong><br />
Hatfield, was appo<strong>in</strong>ted commissary <strong>of</strong> the Western Department.<br />
Soldiers and Dogs<br />
were Enlisted,<br />
Five hundred soldiers were ordered to be<br />
raised iu 1744, two hundred <strong>of</strong> whom were<br />
occu'tred!*^<br />
'°^<br />
to be scut to the western frontiers. Con-<br />
stant scout<strong>in</strong>g was carried on <strong>from</strong> the forts,<br />
under the supervision <strong>of</strong> Capt. Williams. Dogs were<br />
pressed <strong>in</strong>to the service, and accompanied many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
scout<strong>in</strong>g parties, but evidently they did not accomplish all<br />
that was anticipated. Abundant signs <strong>of</strong> the enemy were<br />
discovered, but no collision occurred, and no assault was<br />
made by the Indians <strong>in</strong> this section. It is not known that<br />
any <strong>Northampton</strong> men were engaged <strong>in</strong> this campaign.<br />
Undoubtedly some <strong>of</strong> them enlisted, and were employed <strong>in</strong><br />
the duties already named, but no company <strong>from</strong> this town<br />
appears among the muster-rolls. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the year both<br />
sides were engaged <strong>in</strong> preparations for the conflict. The<br />
burden <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g the fortifications and scout<strong>in</strong>g fell upon