13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1742.1 SCHOOL LANDS—SCHOOLS—MILL CONTROVERSY. 93<br />

" abid<strong>in</strong>g monument " designat<strong>in</strong>g the height <strong>of</strong> the dam,<br />

and the K<strong>in</strong>gsleys were permitted to " dig <strong>in</strong> the river so as<br />

to br<strong>in</strong>g the fall <strong>in</strong> the river below the bridge up to their<br />

dam."<br />

The Coutroversy For about n<strong>in</strong>eteen years the matter was<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>ueii. apparently settled, when the subject was<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> agitation. The owners <strong>of</strong> the upper<br />

mill, once more brought suit, and by mutual consent the<br />

controversy about the height <strong>of</strong> the dam was referred to<br />

arbitrators <strong>in</strong> 178G. Five years elapsed before the question<br />

was aga<strong>in</strong> opened, and then the town compla<strong>in</strong>ed that the<br />

lower mill was not kept <strong>in</strong> proper condition. It had apparently<br />

been allowed to run down. In the meantime a change<br />

<strong>of</strong> proprietors had taken place, and <strong>in</strong> 1791, Daniel Pomeroy<br />

and Moses and Enos K<strong>in</strong>^sley built an entirely new<br />

dam, put <strong>in</strong> a new water-wheel, and new gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and bolt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>ery. When the new dam was completed, the<br />

selectmen and the proprietors <strong>of</strong> the mill placed an iron<br />

bar <strong>in</strong> the rock, thirty-six feet above it, by which to mark<br />

the height <strong>of</strong> the dam. This ended the contest.<br />

Controversy about Nearly thirty years had passed s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

the Common Lands coutroversy about the common lands had<br />

been adjusted. It was seem<strong>in</strong>gly acquiesced<br />

<strong>in</strong> for a time, but broke out aga<strong>in</strong> and blazed <strong>in</strong>to<br />

fiercer <strong>in</strong>tensity than before. This time it was a question<br />

<strong>of</strong> privilege, caus<strong>in</strong>g much bitterness <strong>of</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>g and keep<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the community <strong>in</strong> a constant turmoil. The dispute<br />

assumed such proportions <strong>in</strong> 1742, that a resort to legal<br />

measures became necessary. Once more the question<br />

turned upon the right <strong>of</strong> the general public to cut wood<br />

and timber upon pasture and unimproved commons. This<br />

right, expressly guaranteed <strong>in</strong> the division <strong>of</strong> 1684, seems to<br />

have been overlooked or purposely omitted <strong>in</strong> the readjustment<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1715. The matter came before the town at a meet-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g held January 11, 174|, when the follow<strong>in</strong>g action was<br />

taken —<br />

:<br />

" Whereas there hath been a Controversie long Subsist<strong>in</strong>g between<br />

the Town & Proprietors respect<strong>in</strong>g their Rights to the Undivided<br />

Lands Near the body <strong>of</strong> the Town.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!