13.08.2013 Views

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

History of Northampton, Massachusetts, from its settlement in 1654;

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1737] NEW MEETING-HOUSE. 71<br />

thankful. On Friday, the 5"' day <strong>of</strong> May, 1738, we pulled down the<br />

old meet<strong>in</strong>g house, without hurt to any man, or to the new house."<br />

Accidents. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>toxicants<br />

consumed, the laborious task <strong>of</strong> rais<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

huge frame was accomplished without accident. But dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g year, two persons were <strong>in</strong>jured, while at<br />

work on the build<strong>in</strong>g. Jonathan Strong was fjaid £3 for<br />

^'sett<strong>in</strong>g his bone, broken while work<strong>in</strong>g at y" meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

house," and £3.10 was paid to "y*" Ebenezer Burt's thy."<br />

bonesetter for sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The Spire, Pews At the auuual town-mcet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 173^, the<br />

and Seats. buildiug Committee reported progress and<br />

were discharged. A vote to complete the<br />

striicture dur<strong>in</strong>g the year immediately followed, and a new<br />

committee was chosen to carry on the work. The question<br />

<strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g a spire or steeple had not been previously set-<br />

tled, and the matter was entrusted to the discretion <strong>of</strong> this<br />

committee, with <strong>in</strong>structions to " advise with some Workmen<br />

with Respect to the Height, manner and method <strong>of</strong><br />

Build<strong>in</strong>g the Same." It was also " voted that <strong>in</strong> the meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

House now a Build<strong>in</strong>g, there Shall be Pews made<br />

round the meet<strong>in</strong>g House and only Seats on both Sides <strong>of</strong><br />

the Alley." Accord<strong>in</strong>gly pews were placed along the outer<br />

walls on all sides <strong>of</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g. The "alley," — "broad<br />

a,lley," as it is elsewhere called—or broad aisle, extended<br />

through the middle <strong>of</strong> the audience room, <strong>from</strong> the south<br />

door (there were doors on three sides <strong>of</strong> the edifice) to the<br />

pulpit. Twenty-five wall pews were built on the ground<br />

floor, and these seem to have been all the pews authorized<br />

by the above vote. But the earliest seat<strong>in</strong>g plan extant,<br />

very probably the first one ever made, conta<strong>in</strong>s another<br />

tier <strong>of</strong> twelve pews along three sides <strong>of</strong> the narrow aisle<br />

which gave access to the wall pews. These pews were undoubtedly<br />

put <strong>in</strong> when the house was built, and the vote<br />

prescrib<strong>in</strong>g " only seats on both sides <strong>of</strong> the alley," was<br />

construed to mean that all other parts <strong>of</strong> the house should<br />

be provided with pews. This view is confirmed by the fact<br />

that there rema<strong>in</strong>s no record <strong>of</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> any pews<br />

till 1762, when five were constructed, probably <strong>in</strong> the gallery.<br />

The plan referred to shows a tier <strong>of</strong> wall pews,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!