13.08.2013 Views

The Humphreys family in America - citizen hylbom blog

The Humphreys family in America - citizen hylbom blog

The Humphreys family in America - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

842<br />

no mean position at that day. Among his papers and documents was a treatise upon the duties<br />

of his office, which has been preserved. He, with his <strong>family</strong>, removed to New England <strong>in</strong> 1637,*<br />

where they arrived 9 September of the same year, land<strong>in</strong>g at Dorchester, where they lodged the first<br />

night <strong>in</strong> a house belong<strong>in</strong>g to William Hammond, stand<strong>in</strong>g upon the spot where the dwell<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the late venerable Deacon James Humphrey was afterwards built. On the follow<strong>in</strong>g morn<strong>in</strong>g he<br />

promptly began his service as a new settler by the purchase of the house <strong>in</strong> which he had lodged,<br />

with the land about it,t which has cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> possession of the <strong>family</strong> for eight generations, and<br />

where the various members carried on the same branch of bus<strong>in</strong>ess; the old tan-yard cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g well<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the present century. J It was located <strong>in</strong> that part of Dorchester now known as Harrison Square.<br />

Tradition states that Jonas was a glove-maker by trade, <strong>in</strong> England, but that, after settl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at Dorchester, he turned his attention to tann<strong>in</strong>g, glove-mak<strong>in</strong>g probably not be<strong>in</strong>g very profitable<br />

<strong>in</strong> the early settlement of the country. But little, however, has been ascertamed with regard to<br />

their early history.<br />

<strong>The</strong> age of Jonas at the time of his emigration is unknown, but he was well advanced <strong>in</strong><br />

life, his eldest son, James, be<strong>in</strong>g twenty-n<strong>in</strong>e years of age. It is also uncerta<strong>in</strong> whether or not<br />

his wife, Frances, was liv<strong>in</strong>g at that time, as no mention is then or subsequently made of her.<br />

He seems to have been a man of stand<strong>in</strong>g and respectabilit}', and united with the Church <strong>in</strong><br />

Dorchester <strong>in</strong> 1639. "Jonas <strong>Humphreys</strong> laid hold of the covenant the 6''' day 9 mo 1639, as<br />

also his wife."<br />

—<br />

Church Record. He was a grantee of Necklands <strong>in</strong> 1637; was made a freeman<br />

16 May, 1640; and proprietor <strong>in</strong> the great lots <strong>in</strong> 1646.<br />

He married, for his second wife, Jane Clapp, widow of George Weeks,** and niece of<br />

Richard Clapp, of Dorchester. She was born <strong>in</strong> Salcombe Regis, England, and died <strong>in</strong> Dorchester,<br />

2 August, 1668. By her first husband she had four children: William, Amiell, Jane and Joseph.<br />

* Hist, Ptn-ckesier, p. 124, gives the date of his com<strong>in</strong>g as 1634, though the deed was not given till 1637.<br />

t This is the <strong>family</strong> tradition, which is fairly entitled to credit This place constituted the <strong>Humphreys</strong> homestead and has con-<br />

t<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> possession of the <strong>family</strong> and name by succession, and is at present owned and occupied by Deacon Henry <strong>Humphreys</strong> and his<br />

maiden sister, Mary Ann, l<strong>in</strong>eal descendants of the first Jonas, of Dorchester <strong>The</strong>re is a difference between the accounts of the families<br />

of Jonas and Frances <strong>Humphreys</strong>, as given by Mr Clapp <strong>in</strong> his History of Dorchester, and that handed down and given by the descend<br />

ants. <strong>The</strong> traditional account mentions only two sons and two daughters^ Elizabeth and Susanna, while Mr Clapp names the same and<br />

adds Sarah, who was buried <strong>in</strong> 1638, and also says there was another daughter, who married a Mr. Foye. He is probably correct, js<br />

<strong>in</strong> the transmitt<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>family</strong> records and traditions it was common to omit the names of such children as died young, and sometimes all<br />

who died without issue: and also because there is no evidence that there was <strong>in</strong> the Colony at the time any person or lamily ol the<br />

name, except<strong>in</strong>g that of Patentee and Deputy-Governor John Humphrey, of Lynn- He had a daughter Sai:ah. for whom the above could<br />

not well be mistaken, as she had not died so early, as see W<strong>in</strong>thiop, Vol II, p 45 Of this <strong>family</strong> there is no account of the marriage<br />

of more than one daughter—Ann, his eldest, to William Palmer (p 90). So it is probable that their omission from the recorded and<br />

traditional <strong>family</strong> accounts results from their hav<strong>in</strong>g died prior to the preservation of such accounts and without issue O M H<br />

Its former owner, Wm Hammond, removed to W<strong>in</strong>dsor. Ct. His deed of the property to Humphrey is as follows.<br />

' William Hammond of Dorchester, together vrith the consent of his wife to sell unto the said Jonas Humfrey of Dorchester my<br />

House & three acres of land lott adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g there unto together with the Swamp before the door & also the platt of land that is my right<br />

& proper due and to be taken <strong>in</strong> at the West end of my lott next unto Roxbury: & my meadow ground at the fresh marsh the value of<br />

one acre or thereabouts with my great lott & all other rights <strong>in</strong> Common or that shall hereafter be alloted: for the sum of five and<br />

Thirty pounds to be paid unto the said William Hammond; or his assynes by the said Jonas Humfrey or his assynes for the payment<br />

there of it is thus agreed that he shall pay the said Willm Hammond 28 pounds at the present seal<strong>in</strong>g here ol and 8 pounds at the<br />

present time when the saide William Hammond shall have cleared the house of all goods and annoyances, and the other seven pounds<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the s.aide William Hammond is to have of the saide Jonas Humlrey. of meale of the value ot Bushells al the<br />

'<br />

price 3 pounds, 12 shill<strong>in</strong>gs and the other sum of money the payment rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to be thus 40 shill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> money that it can be conveni-<br />

ently provided, or otherwise 10 be paid <strong>in</strong> such sufficient goods as the said Jonas Humfrey hath to pay. In witness whereof. I have set<br />

my hand & scale <strong>in</strong> the presence of those above written, the mark of William Hammond<br />

Witnesses<br />

X<br />

James Himfrey<br />

Oliver<br />

[<strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g was written on the back of the deed, but nearly obliterated]: <strong>The</strong>se presents I Willian. Hammond .)f Dor-<br />

chester doe covenant & promise unto the saide Jonas Humfrey that <strong>in</strong> my House or homo I have sold to Ilie said joyas Humfrey the<br />

parcel of that land that is to be taken <strong>in</strong> beh<strong>in</strong>d the said House lott belong<strong>in</strong>g to the said House: shall <strong>in</strong> after time demanded or<br />

required of the saide Jonas Humfrey or his heirs or assynes 1 the said William Hammond aforesaid do covenant and promise to the<br />

said Jonas Humfrey aforesaide or his ayres or assynes to be fully satisfied either <strong>in</strong> or payment for the saide sum or otherwise<br />

and hereunto 1 have my hand & seale of these witnesses here under named "<br />

X One of the old vats ol the orig<strong>in</strong>al tannery has been carefully covered and preserved, and is still to be seen on ihe estate<br />

Weeks was one of the first colonists, and died 27 Oct., 1659

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!