The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ... The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

13.08.2013 Views

80 The English Ancestry of This Will has an autograph signature ; much to my disap- pointment an application for permission to trace it for re- production here was refused, under the rules of Somerset House. Of the witnesses, William Vaughan was then the Parish Priest of St. Michael's ; Robert Blosse has the name of one of the sons of Sissely (24), but that Robert could hardly been of age when this Will was executed. Thomas Churchman received a legacy of the same amount from Robert (8), and his wife was remembered by Isabell, Robert's widow, but there is nothing to show any relationship be- tween the families. Whether the John Johnsonne mentioned by Reinold bore any relation to the Katherine named by Robert, or whether Alice Beteryche was the mother or a sister of the Matthew and John named in Robert's Will, we can only conjecture ; but the recurrence in the three Wills of so many names of persons more or less closely connected seems worthy of notice in passing, and taken with the other facts which have been cited, shows that there is reason- able ground for the belief that Reinold was the nephew of Robert (8). As the legacies to the Howes are so much larger than the others and are apparently given to a father and his sons, they attract our notice ; but nothing has been found to in- dicate any relationship, or to suggest a reason for the gift. The " Bridge," for the repair of which legacies were often left in the Wills herein cited, is shown on the map. In Morant's time this was a long structure of timber "in the great road to Harwich, and was kept up at the charge of

Reinold and Matthew Marvin 81 the County." It crossed a tidal creek south of the "Ray," and united Ramsey, on the east side, with "Ramsey Street," on the west. It is evident from a Will to be cited later, that one branch of the family lived very near it, and from various allusions it would appear that there were other Mar- vin homes between this bridge and Dovercourt, which even at this distance of time could be located without great diffi- culty. 17 Thomas 4 ( ?John? John? Roger 1 ), of Ramsey, b. ? 15 18 ; he must have been younger than either John or Reinold, as he left but one child, while Reinold, who died earlier,* had six, and John four if not five. Though of Ramsey when he died, his name is not found among those taxed in the "Exchequer Lay Subsidy" in 1540, so that if living there at that time, as his brothers were, he was then probably under age. He married Mrs. Barbara Brett, who had had three children, Joan, Margaret, and Mary, by a previous husband, and these receive legacies from their step-father. Thomas owned houses and lands, both free and copy-hold, in Ramsey ; estates in Little Oakley called " Brandon " and " Clay pittes," and he also had property in Suffolk County, which is not named, but the fact may have some bearing on the Ipswich relationship of the Ramsey Marvins, suggested on a previous page. He, like his brothers, was evidently * Thomas, in his Will (1561), speaks of him as " lat of Ramsey, deceased." Rei- nold's Will, as we have seen, was dated December, ; 1554 as the date of probate is not given we have been unable to fix the year of his death more nearly. Very likely Thomas was younger than Christian also, the date of birth given being conjectural, as stated.

<strong>Reinold</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Matthew</strong> <strong>Marvin</strong> 81<br />

the County." It crossed a tidal creek south <strong>of</strong> the "Ray,"<br />

<strong>and</strong> united Ramsey, on the east side, with "Ramsey Street,"<br />

on the west. It is evident from a Will to be cited later,<br />

that one branch <strong>of</strong> the family lived very near it, <strong>and</strong> from<br />

various allusions it would appear that there were other Mar-<br />

vin homes between this bridge <strong>and</strong> Dovercourt, which even<br />

at this distance <strong>of</strong> time could be located without great diffi-<br />

culty.<br />

17 Thomas 4 ( ?John? John? Roger 1<br />

), <strong>of</strong> Ramsey, b. ? 15 18 ;<br />

he must have been younger than either John or <strong>Reinold</strong>, as<br />

he left but one child, while <strong>Reinold</strong>, who died earlier,* had<br />

six, <strong>and</strong> John four if not five. Though <strong>of</strong> Ramsey when<br />

he died, his name is not found among those taxed in the<br />

"Exchequer Lay Subsidy" in 1540, so that if living there<br />

at that time, as his brothers were, he was then probably<br />

under age. He married Mrs. Barbara Brett, who had had<br />

three children, Joan, Margaret, <strong>and</strong> Mary, by a previous<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> these receive legacies from their step-father.<br />

Thomas owned houses <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s, both free <strong>and</strong> copy-hold,<br />

in Ramsey ; estates in Little Oakley called " Br<strong>and</strong>on " <strong>and</strong><br />

" Clay pittes," <strong>and</strong> he also had property in Suffolk County,<br />

which is not named, but the fact may have some bearing on<br />

the Ipswich relationship <strong>of</strong> the Ramsey <strong>Marvin</strong>s, suggested<br />

on a previous page. He, like his brothers, was evidently<br />

* Thomas, in his Will (1561), speaks <strong>of</strong> him as " lat <strong>of</strong> Ramsey, deceased." Rei-<br />

nold's Will, as we have seen, was dated December, ; 1554 as the date <strong>of</strong> probate is<br />

not given we have been unable to fix the year <strong>of</strong> his death more nearly. Very likely<br />

Thomas was younger than Christian also, the date <strong>of</strong> birth given being conjectural, as<br />

stated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!