The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ... The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

13.08.2013 Views

Reinold and Matthew Marvin 151 86 i. William, 7 bap. 4 Nov., 1618. 87 ii. Elizabeth, bap. 19 April, 1621. 88 iii. Sara, bap. 22 July, 1629. 89 iv. Reinold, " son of Reynold and Marie Marvin, was christened 20 Dec, 163 1." (Language of Parish record.) He came to New England with his father and was "Lieutenant Reinold," of the "Train-band " of Lyme, Conn., and a mem- ber of the Colonial Legislature.* 90 v. Mary, " daughter of Reynold and Mary Marvin, was christened 23 Oct., 1636." (Ibid.) She married, about 1656, William Waller, who had previously resided at Salem, Mass., but was then of Saybrook, Conn. They had issue : (i) Will- iam ; (ii) John; (iii) Samuel, who d. in 1742, "very aged;" (iv) Matthew. She survived her father, but the date of her death is unknown. There were families of this name in Ipswich, Suffolk, but no attempt has been made to connect them with the husband of Mary. The lands which Reinold received from his father near Moyse Hall were in Ramsey Parish, and if there were chil- dren between Elizabeth and Sarah, they would have been recorded on St. Michael's registers ; these, as we have seen, are too late to help us. We do not know whether either of the three older children ever came to New England ; as only Reinold and Mary are mentioned in their father's Will, it seems probable that the others died early. The Parish of Great Bentley, or Bentley Magna, is in Ten- dring Hundred, ten miles south-west of Ramsey, and having * The descendants of Reinold " are given in the Marvin Monograph in " Family Histories and Genealogies," published by Professor Edward E. Salisbury, of Yale Uni- versity, and Mrs. [Evelyn MeCurdy] Salisbury, who is a descendant of Reinold Mar- vin. The Will of Reinold B is printed in that work, Vol. Ill, p. 109.

152 The English Ancestry of near its northern border the old road running to London by the way of Colchester ; it is eight miles south-east of the latter place, and sixty-two miles from London, on the Ten- dring Hundred branch of the Great Eastern Railway. It takes its name, says Morant, "from bent, a sort of grass, or place where rushes grow, and ley, pasture or unploughed ground." In the reign of Edward the Confessor, Ulwin was owner of the Parish. At the time of the Survey, Alberic de Vere, ancestor of the Earls of Oxford, held it. His estate is valued in "Domesday," and his descendants re- tained it till 14.61, when, during the Wars of the Roses, it fell to the Crown (Edward IV) by attainder,— perhaps for the attachment of its owner to the cause of Henry VI, the last of the Lancastrian Kings. The De Veres regained a large estate here on the acces- sion of Henry VII, in 1485, which was subsequently sold for a debt to the Crown, to one Glascock. The next owner was Sir Roger Townshend, who held it of Queen Elizabeth " in capite by knight's service;" he died in 1590, and it then passed to his son Sir John, his grandson Sir Roger, baronet, and then to Sir Horatio, who sold it to a London merchant, Nicholas Corsellis. The Townshends were therefore " Lords of the Manor " when our ancestors were living there. The De Vere mansion stood in "Hall Field," and was once a splendid and stately seat, with moat and fish ponds, aad a handsome park, but nothing now remains of the an- cient building. The present manor house is situated on the north side of the Church ; the later owners of this

152<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>English</strong> Ancestry <strong>of</strong><br />

near its northern border the old road running to London by<br />

the way <strong>of</strong> Colchester ; it is eight miles south-east <strong>of</strong> the<br />

latter place, <strong>and</strong> sixty-two miles from London, on the Ten-<br />

dring Hundred branch <strong>of</strong> the Great Eastern Railway. It<br />

takes its name, says Morant, "from bent, a sort <strong>of</strong> grass, or<br />

place where rushes grow, <strong>and</strong> ley, pasture or unploughed<br />

ground." In the reign <strong>of</strong> Edward the Confessor, Ulwin was<br />

owner <strong>of</strong> the Parish. At the time <strong>of</strong> the Survey, Alberic<br />

de Vere, ancestor <strong>of</strong> the Earls <strong>of</strong> Oxford, held it. His<br />

estate is valued in "Domesday," <strong>and</strong> his descendants re-<br />

tained it till 14.61, when, during the Wars <strong>of</strong> the Roses, it<br />

fell to the Crown (Edward IV) by attainder,— perhaps for<br />

the attachment <strong>of</strong> its owner to the cause <strong>of</strong> Henry VI, the<br />

last <strong>of</strong> the Lancastrian Kings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> De Veres regained a large estate here on the acces-<br />

sion <strong>of</strong> Henry VII, in 1485, which was subsequently sold for<br />

a debt to the Crown, to one Glascock. <strong>The</strong> next owner was<br />

Sir Roger Townshend, who held it <strong>of</strong> Queen Elizabeth " in<br />

capite by knight's service;" he died in 1590, <strong>and</strong> it then<br />

passed to his son Sir John, his gr<strong>and</strong>son Sir Roger, baronet,<br />

<strong>and</strong> then to Sir Horatio, who sold it to a London merchant,<br />

Nicholas Corsellis. <strong>The</strong> Townshends were therefore " Lords<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Manor " when our ancestors were living there.<br />

<strong>The</strong> De Vere mansion stood in "Hall Field," <strong>and</strong> was<br />

once a splendid <strong>and</strong> stately seat, with moat <strong>and</strong> fish ponds,<br />

aad a h<strong>and</strong>some park, but nothing now remains <strong>of</strong> the an-<br />

cient building. <strong>The</strong> present manor house is situated on<br />

the north side <strong>of</strong> the Church ;<br />

the later owners <strong>of</strong> this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!