The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ... The English ancestry of Reinold and Matthew Marvin of Hartford, Ct ...

13.08.2013 Views

118 The EnglisJi Ancestry of fyrst I bequeth my sowle to almyghtye god my creator & my body to be buryed in the yerthe Item I geve vnto Mergreat my wyffe the one halfe of all my movable goodes Item more I geve my house where Sewell dwelleth wyth the yeard therto belongyng wyth all my land on the other syde the waye vnto my sayed wyffe duering hyr naturall lyfe one thys condycyon that she clayme no thyrdes in my other land and yf she be wyth chylde I geve yt vnto that chylde for Ever after my wyfes deces Item I geve vnto ales gyllyat my kynsewoman vj? viij d more I geve vnto hyr syster An pakeman iij? iiij d Item I geve vnto penlye iij? iiij d more I geve vnto Sewell my tennante \\f. iiij d all the Rest of my goodes vnbequethed I geve vnto An merven my dowghter my detes beyng payd wyth all the houses & landes vnbequethed whatsoever they be to hyr & her heyers for Ever and I wyll John Wade of lytle Okelye aforsayd to be hyr garden vntyll she come to the age of xxiiij yeres & he to have & take all the prophyt of hyr land tyll she come to hyr aforesayd age to se hyr kept & well brought up Item I wyll that yf god take awye my doughter before John Sallawes leace be exspyred then I wyll the sayde John Wade shall have & take all the Rent that should have ben dew vnto hyr duryng that leace in consyderacion of monye that I do owe hym Item I wyll that my wyffe shall paye out of hyr part to more of Harwyche xxx s & to John Herd & John Wade v'f. viij d that I do owe them for grounde I hyred of them Item I surrender my landes & houses in to the handes of the lord in the presents of John Herd & Thomas Cartwryt tenanntes John Sewell beyng baylyfe to the vse of my wyll & I ordayn Jon Wade aforsayd to be myne Executor to se thys my wyll fulfylled wytnes here unto thomas cartwryt John Herde John Sallowes Laurence pakeman wyth other mo

Reinold and MattJiczv Marvin 119 The name of the tenant is John Sallowes in both places in the copy ; in the first instance in the Will it may be "fallowes." Whether John Herd was one of the Ramsey family of that name, one of whom married Rcinold's sister Christian [see 18, p. 39], has not been learned. 62 Thomas, 5 of Copdocke, b. , ( , 4 ? Robert? John* Robert, 1 ) who was incidentally alluded to on page 67, must here be mentioned. There is nothing to show that any re- lationship existed between him and Robert (11) of Great Bel- stead, or his brother John, aside from the fact that one of the family name is found with his children living in that little village contemporaneously with descendants of John. 2 It was interesting to discover, when the search of the Washbrook Register from 1559 to 1600 was made, that there are several families of Marvins still residing in Copdocke * (the adjoin- ing Parish), but as the Registers of Chattisham and Belstead contain no Marvins, and those of Copdocke begin with 1701, nothing can now be learned to show what connection, if any, there was between these, or Thomas, and those already mentioned, who resided in that immediate vicinity. All that can be said is, that as Robert was born in 1489 or earlier, and this Thomas died in 1597, the latter might have been the son, but more probably I think the grandson, of Robert, and, if so, was of the fifth generation. Apparently also, as will be seen, he had a grandson Robert. He married Marian , who survived him and was the executrix of his Will, which was dated 7 August, 1597, and * Letter from Miss Walford.

<strong>Reinold</strong> <strong>and</strong> MattJiczv <strong>Marvin</strong> 119<br />

<strong>The</strong> name <strong>of</strong> the tenant is John Sallowes in both places<br />

in the copy ; in the first instance in the Will it may be<br />

"fallowes." Whether John Herd was one <strong>of</strong> the Ramsey<br />

family <strong>of</strong> that name, one <strong>of</strong> whom married Rcinold's sister<br />

Christian [see 18, p. 39], has not been learned.<br />

62 Thomas, 5 <strong>of</strong> Copdocke, b. , ( ,<br />

4<br />

? Robert? John*<br />

Robert, 1<br />

) who was incidentally alluded to on page 67, must<br />

here be mentioned. <strong>The</strong>re is nothing to show that any re-<br />

lationship existed between him <strong>and</strong> Robert (11) <strong>of</strong> Great Bel-<br />

stead, or his brother John, aside from the fact that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

family name is found with his children living in that little<br />

village contemporaneously with descendants <strong>of</strong> John. 2<br />

It was<br />

interesting to discover, when the search <strong>of</strong> the Washbrook<br />

Register from 1559 to 1600 was made, that there are several<br />

families <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marvin</strong>s still residing in Copdocke * (the adjoin-<br />

ing Parish), but as the Registers <strong>of</strong> Chattisham <strong>and</strong> Belstead<br />

contain no <strong>Marvin</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> Copdocke begin with 1701,<br />

nothing can now be learned to show what connection, if<br />

any, there was between these, or Thomas, <strong>and</strong> those already<br />

mentioned, who resided in that immediate vicinity.<br />

All that can be said is, that as Robert was born in 1489 or<br />

earlier, <strong>and</strong> this Thomas died in 1597, the latter might have<br />

been the son, but more probably I think the gr<strong>and</strong>son, <strong>of</strong><br />

Robert, <strong>and</strong>, if so, was <strong>of</strong> the fifth generation. Apparently<br />

also, as will be seen, he had a gr<strong>and</strong>son Robert.<br />

He married Marian , who survived him <strong>and</strong> was the<br />

executrix <strong>of</strong> his Will, which was dated 7 August, 1597, <strong>and</strong><br />

* Letter from Miss Walford.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!