13.08.2013 Views

Slide Presentation - Door County Web Map

Slide Presentation - Door County Web Map

Slide Presentation - Door County Web Map

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> farms produce diverse agricultural<br />

products, ranging from dairy to a wide array of<br />

fruits and vegetables, thanks to the county’s<br />

varying soils, topography, and moderate climate.<br />

1


Overall, total number of farms, including<br />

orchards, has trended downward, after factoring<br />

in the change in the way farms are counted.<br />

Change in the way the USDA Census of<br />

Agriculture counted farms created upward spike;<br />

horse and pony, Christmas tree, and maple<br />

syrup farms now counted.<br />

2


Losses occurring in number of mid-size farms.<br />

Between 1987 and 2007:<br />

21% increase in number of large farms (500+<br />

acres)<br />

28% decrease in number of mid-size farms (50<br />

– 499 acres)<br />

71% increase small farms or “hobby” farms (less<br />

than 50 acres)<br />

5


Both number and size of apple & cherry<br />

orchards have significantly decreased<br />

Mid-1940s, 700 cherry growers in the county; by<br />

2002, only 65 growers remained.<br />

As of 2008, approx. 60 cherry farms and 20<br />

apple farms, producing on approx. 3,000<br />

acres.<br />

6


Conversion of agricultural land to nonagricultural<br />

use in <strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> exceeds eastern<br />

district and state averages.<br />

Between 2000 and 2002, 64% (yearly average)<br />

of agricultural land sold in <strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

converted to non-agricultural uses, compared to<br />

the state’s average of 29%.<br />

9


Loss of agricultural land coincides with the<br />

increase in seasonal and year-round population,<br />

particularly in the northern part of the county;<br />

population growth between 2000 and 2006 in<br />

north accounted for 51% of all growth in the<br />

county.<br />

Towns experiencing high population growth in<br />

northern <strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> also had some of the<br />

greatest percentage declines in dairy farm<br />

numbers.<br />

10


Number of hobby farms has gone up partly due to<br />

niche agriculture in the areas of:<br />

organic and sustainable farming<br />

market farms<br />

production of landscaping trees and plants<br />

Over 80 (15 – 20%) agricultural producers that<br />

sell their products locally at roadside stands,<br />

farmers markets, or directly from<br />

the farm.<br />

11


GOAL 2: Establish and enhance local education,<br />

coordination, and funding efforts to promote<br />

agricultural preservation.<br />

GOAL 5: Preserve existing agriculture and<br />

promote more sustainable agricultural<br />

operations, providing local food sources to serve<br />

present and future generations.<br />

12


Develop local plans, ordinances, and programs<br />

to retain large, contiguous areas of prime<br />

agriculture.<br />

Support and preserve small family farms as well<br />

as low-impact and emerging agricultural<br />

operations.<br />

13


sustainable agriculture practices, such as<br />

organic certification<br />

sustainable forestry practices<br />

producing, processing, and selling crops locally<br />

allow appropriate processing and sales options<br />

on-site for agricultural uses.<br />

tap into the growing “buy local” movement.<br />

14


Revised Chapter 91 – “Working Lands Initiative” –<br />

effective July 1, 2009.<br />

New statutory definition of “Agricultural Use”:<br />

Crop or forage production (includes orchards)<br />

Keeping livestock<br />

Beekeeping<br />

Nursery, sod, or Christmas tree production; forest<br />

management<br />

Floriculture, aquaculture<br />

Fur farming<br />

Enrollment in federal agricultural commodity payment<br />

program or federal or state agricultural land<br />

conservation payment program 16


Multiple components: county farmland<br />

preservation plans; income tax credits for<br />

Exclusive Agricultural zoning and/or Agricultural<br />

Enterprise Areas; Purchase of Agricultural<br />

Conservation Easements.<br />

Conservation standard compliance required.<br />

Most components of law not effective until<br />

updated plan, maps, and ordinance developed<br />

and certified by DATCP. <strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> plan must<br />

be certified by December 31, 2012.<br />

17


$5.00/acre if located in AEA only.<br />

$7.50/acre if located in EA zoning only.<br />

$10.00/acre if zoned EA and in AEA.<br />

All must:<br />

Earn at least $6,000/year in gross farm<br />

revenue (or $18,000 over 3-year<br />

period).<br />

Be in compliance with NR 151<br />

Agricultural Performance Standards.<br />

Use the land primarily for agriculture.<br />

Have paid property taxes.<br />

18


No minimum lot size mandated by state.<br />

Some non-farm development on small lots<br />

allowed, either via conditional use permit<br />

or by rezoning and paying conversion fee.<br />

Creation of small lots no longer needs to<br />

be for farm consolidation purposes or for<br />

farm workers/family residences.<br />

$7.50/acre income tax credit.<br />

19


Rezoning out of EA requires “findings findings of fact” fact and shall<br />

be “substantially substantially consistent” consistent with farmland preservation<br />

plan.<br />

Fee for rezoning lands out of EA:<br />

3 times Dept. of Revenue (DOR) Grade 1 cropland<br />

value.<br />

Example: Clay Banks Grade 1 value is $219/acre<br />

(changes yearly). $219/acre x 3 = $657/acre.<br />

Fee collected by county, sent to DOR.<br />

Owners not collecting tax credits still subject to fee.<br />

No fee for sale of land.<br />

No fee for rezoning as part of plan certification process.<br />

20


Country Road<br />

John &<br />

Mary Smith<br />

Zoned EA<br />

40 a<br />

John & Mary Smith<br />

Zoned EA<br />

20 a<br />

John & Mary Smith<br />

Purchased 20 a<br />

Zoned EA<br />

Smith<br />

Acres LLC<br />

Zoned EA<br />

40 a<br />

Base Farm Tract 2 – 40 acres<br />

Base Farm Tract 1 – 60 acres<br />

Ownership of both parcels is exactly the same<br />

Purchased land after base farm tract<br />

determined; does not change base farm tract<br />

acreage. 22


Individual and cluster developments of non-farm lots<br />

may be allowed by CUP in EA if:<br />

Ratio of non-farm lot acreage to the base farm tract<br />

acreage minus the non-farm acreage is less than 1 to<br />

20 (0.05); and<br />

No more than 4 non-farm dwelling units established<br />

on base farm tract (an additional farm residence is<br />

also allowed for each base tract); and<br />

Proposed non-farm parcel(s) will not:<br />

Convert prime farmland or cropland (other than a<br />

woodlot) from agricultural use, unless no<br />

reasonable alternative location.<br />

Significantly impair or limit the current or future<br />

agricultural use of any other protected farmland.<br />

23


Country Road<br />

John &<br />

Mary Smith<br />

40 a<br />

Zoned EA<br />

John &<br />

Mary Smith<br />

– 20 a<br />

Zoned EA<br />

Base farm tract = 60 acres<br />

1 existing farm residence<br />

Ratio of non-farm acreage to farm<br />

acreage minus non-farm acreage may<br />

not exceed 1 to 20 (0.05).<br />

DATCP formula:<br />

R (non-farm development<br />

acreage allowed) = Base farm<br />

tract acreage /21.<br />

Up to 2.85 acres of non-farm lots<br />

allowed. Could contain up to four<br />

non-farm residences.<br />

May<br />

authorize<br />

with CUP if<br />

new lots do<br />

not convert<br />

prime soils<br />

or cropland<br />

or impair/<br />

limit future<br />

agricultural<br />

use of any<br />

other<br />

protected<br />

farmland.<br />

24


Contiguous land area devoted primarily to<br />

agricultural use and locally targeted for agricultural<br />

preservation and agricultural development.<br />

AEA must be identified as preservation area in<br />

county Farmland Preservation Plan map.<br />

Application must be submitted by five or more<br />

eligible farms (land totaling at least 1,000 acres) and<br />

the local government, and be approved by DATCP.<br />

Farmers in AEAs are eligible for income tax credits<br />

($5/acre) if they enter individual, 15-year contracts<br />

with DATCP. Early contract release requires<br />

payment of conversion fee (same formula as for<br />

rezoning out of EA district).<br />

25


Pilot program underway: Approx. 12 AEAs and<br />

200,000 acres approved statewide for program start<br />

January 1, 2011.<br />

2011 applications being solicited now for 2012<br />

program start; February 18, 2011 deadline.<br />

Interested parties should also contact Coreen Fallat<br />

at coreen.fallat@wisconsin.gov or (608) 224-4625<br />

prior to submitting a petition.<br />

Petition form on DATCP website,<br />

http://www.datcp.state.wi.us/workinglands/forms.jsp.<br />

26


State will provide 50% matching grants toward<br />

PACE.<br />

Participants: landowners, non-profit<br />

organizations, local and other governments.<br />

Permanent deed restrictions, binding current<br />

and future owners.<br />

Land remains on tax rolls as agricultural land.<br />

No public access requirement.<br />

Applications solicited annually; DATCP<br />

determining selection process.<br />

27


<strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> Soil & Water Conservation<br />

Department (SWCD) will review compliance for:<br />

Cropland Erosion<br />

Manure Storage Facilities<br />

Clean Water Diversion<br />

Nutrient Management<br />

Manure Management<br />

DATCP still working on processes for reporting<br />

and communication between agencies (DOR,<br />

<strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong> SWCD, and DATCP).<br />

28


New landowner certification requirements<br />

starting with the 2010 tax return<br />

Most landowners can work toward achieving<br />

compliance while still claiming a tax credit<br />

Counties and DATCP have new compliance<br />

monitoring responsibilities<br />

29


Which Operations Must Meet State<br />

Conservation Standards?<br />

Operations in certified<br />

agricultural zoning<br />

districts<br />

Operations with new or<br />

modified agreements<br />

signed after 2009<br />

Operations with<br />

agreements signed after<br />

~2004 (new conservation<br />

standards)


State Conservation Standards<br />

Sheet, Rill & Wind Erosion Nutrient Management


State Conservation Standards<br />

New or substantially altered<br />

manure storage<br />

Existing failing or leaking<br />

manure storage


State Conservation Standards<br />

Clean water diversions<br />

Water quality<br />

management areas<br />

Areas susceptible to<br />

groundwater<br />

contamination<br />

Within 300 feet of a<br />

navigable stream<br />

Within 1,000 feet of a<br />

lake


State Conservation Standards<br />

No overflow of manure<br />

structures<br />

No unconfined manure<br />

stacks in WQMAs


State Conservation Standards<br />

No direct runoff from feedlots or<br />

stored manure<br />

No unlimited livestock access to<br />

waters of the state


Compliance is Required for the<br />

Entire Farm<br />

All parts of the farm must be compliant with<br />

all agricultural performance standards and<br />

manure management prohibitions<br />

Does not only apply to land for which the credit is<br />

claimed<br />

Entire farm includes:<br />

Commonly owned land used as part of a single<br />

farm operation<br />

Shared/rented land for manure applications<br />

Land not in agricultural production


Landowner Responsibilities<br />

Must certify compliance to claim tax credit<br />

for CY 2010<br />

For landowners who claimed in 2009<br />

Exhibit compliance<br />

Develop a schedule to achieve compliance<br />

No later than December 31, 2015<br />

Landowners that did not claim in 2009 must<br />

certify compliance and will not be allowed to<br />

schedule compliance<br />

May amend tax return if compliance is later<br />

verified


Notice of Noncompliance<br />

Failure to comply with conservation<br />

standards<br />

Failure to permit a reasonable inspection<br />

Failure to respond to self-certification<br />

self certification<br />

requests<br />

Offer of cost-share cost share is not needed to<br />

require compliance to maintain the ability<br />

to receive tax credits


After 12/31/2012, for <strong>Door</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

farmers to be eligible for tax credits,<br />

farmland preservation plan and map<br />

must meet state Working Lands Initiative<br />

standards and be certified by DATCP.<br />

If any EA zoning, zoning ordinance and<br />

map(s) also must be certified.<br />

Farmland preservation plan text and map<br />

must be consistent with zoning; all must<br />

be consistent with comprehensive plan.<br />

39


1. Clay Banks retains and/or other towns choose<br />

to have (some) areas zoned EA.<br />

2. Rezone all EA to a different agricultural zoning<br />

district, such as Prime Agricultural or General<br />

Agricultural.<br />

3. Pursue AEA designation(s), regardless of<br />

zoning district(s).<br />

4. Pursue PACE option, regardless of zoning<br />

district(s).<br />

5. Forego participation in formal state programs.<br />

6. Develop (other or additional) programs within<br />

the county.<br />

40


November 30, 2010: Kick-off meeting.<br />

Winter 2010-2011: Public Participation Plan,<br />

possible grant application for plan development.<br />

2011: Planning, SWCD, UWEX, and interested<br />

farmers and others develop draft plan based on<br />

comp. plans and other public input.<br />

Early 2012: Submit plan (and ordinance ?)<br />

certification application(s) to DATCP.<br />

Late 2012: <strong>County</strong> adopts final versions;<br />

county and towns amend comprehensive plan<br />

future land use maps, if necessary.<br />

Zoning ordinance amendments in place by<br />

1/1/2014. (Note: conversion fees required if<br />

EA zoning map removals not adopted “in<br />

conjunction” with plan certification.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!