13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the focal species and their associated analysis areas Alternative E adds 0 miles of<br />

routes, Alternatives D adds 0 to 8 miles, Alternative F and G add 0 to 21 miles, and<br />

Alternative C adds 0 to 41 miles of unauthorized routes. Alternative C is the only<br />

alternative that allows for an actual increase in miles of routes through the associated<br />

analysis areas. Because the Gila currently allows cross country travel some proposed<br />

routes even though unauthorized are currently being used.<br />

Findings:<br />

Table59: Raptorial birds Forest Service sensitive species determination by alternative<br />

Sensitive Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Northern goshawk *MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Peregrine falcon MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Bald eagle MI MI MI MI MI<br />

Rationale for<br />

determination<br />

*MI – May impact<br />

Under alternatives D, E, F, and G, the potential effects to these raptors are<br />

reduced, particularly under alternatives E and D. Under alternative C, there is an<br />

increase in motorized routes in both goshawk analysis areas, the peregrine<br />

analysis area, and the golden eagle analysis area. The potential to affect<br />

individuals under all action alternatives exists; therefore, a determination of “may<br />

impact” is made for all action alternatives. None of the alternatives would affect<br />

the viability of these species or cause a trend toward Federal listing.<br />

Table 60: Northern goshawk Gila National Forest management indicator species<br />

determination by alternative<br />

Management<br />

Indicator Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Northern goshawk *NA NA NA NA NA<br />

Rationale for<br />

determination<br />

Under alternatives D, E, F, and G the potential effects to goshawks are reduced,<br />

particularly under alternatives E and D. Under alternative C, there is an increase in<br />

motorized routes in both goshawk analysis areas. The potential to affect individuals under<br />

all action alternatives exists. Population and habitat trends for the northern goshawk would<br />

not be affected by any of the action alternatives.<br />

*NA – No adverse effects to the population or habitat trends<br />

Table 61: Raptor New Mexico Partners in Flight (NMPIF) high-priority species<br />

determination by alternative<br />

NMPIF High-Priority<br />

Species<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

Northern goshawk¹ *NA NA NA NA NA<br />

Peregrine falcon² NA NA NA NA NA<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!