13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

trails and acres of potentially affected habitat increase by 3% to 10% in all analysis area<br />

under Alternative C. Since these are new miles and acres of disturbance there is a greater<br />

potential to cause direct and indirect to this species and it habitat under Alternative C.<br />

Alternative E and D add 0 miles of currently closed or unauthorized routes in the PAC<br />

analysis area. Alternative F and G add 2 miles of currently closed motorized trails and 2<br />

miles of currently unauthorized routes to the PAC analysis area. Alternative C adds 2<br />

miles of currently closed motorized trail and 7 miles of unauthorized routes to the PAC<br />

analysis area. In restricted habitat alternative C is the only action alternative that adds<br />

any currently closed or unauthorized routes, 11 miles to this analysis area. In critical<br />

habitat all action alternatives at a minimum reopen 1 mile road. The reopening of this 1<br />

mile should not affect the primary constituent elements of critical habitat. Alternative F<br />

and G reopen an additional 7 miles of closed road to OHVs and 4 miles of unauthorized<br />

trail. These two alternatives have a greater potential to affect the primary constituent<br />

elements of critical habitat. Alternative C reopens an additional 7 miles of closed road to<br />

OHVs and 43 miles of unauthorized trail. This alternative has the greatest potential to<br />

affect the primary constituent elements of critical habitat. Alternative C is the only<br />

alternative that allows for an actual increase in miles of routes through the associated<br />

analysis areas. New routes have the potential to cause new disturbance.<br />

In these analysis areas the area of potentially affected habitat for motorized big game<br />

retrieval is reduced by 100% under Alternative E, 97 to 99% under Alternative D, 37 to<br />

41% under Alternative F, 96 to 98% under Alternative G, and 12 to 16% under<br />

Alternative C.<br />

Findings:<br />

Table 51: Mexican spotted owl federally listed species and critical habitat<br />

determinations by alternative<br />

Federally<br />

Listed Species<br />

Mexican spotted<br />

owl<br />

Mexican spotted<br />

owl critical<br />

habitat<br />

Rationale for<br />

species<br />

determination<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing<br />

Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

*MALAA **MANLAA MANLAA MALAA MALAA<br />

MALAA MANLAA MANLAA MALAA MALAA<br />

Under alternatives E and D, longer term beneficial effects to the<br />

species and its habitat are greater than the other action alternatives,<br />

respectively. Under alternatives F and G, long-term beneficial effects<br />

are less, but both still benefit the species and its habitat above the<br />

existing condition. These four alternatives do change the use within<br />

portions of each of the analysis areas; proposing administrative use.<br />

This change in use causes less effects than roads and trails open to all<br />

of the public. Alternatives E and D don’t add any closed roads in<br />

protected activity centers and do not change the primary constituent<br />

elements of designated critical habitat, don’t affect mixed conifer<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!