13.08.2013 Views

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

Wildlife Specialist report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In these analysis areas the area of potentially affected habitat for motorized big game<br />

retrieval is reduced by 100% under Alternative E, 83 to 93% under Alternative D, 0 to<br />

30% under Alternative F, 83 to 93% under Alternative G, and 0 to 10% under Alternative<br />

C.<br />

Table72: Southwestern willow flycatcher federally listed species and critical habitat<br />

determinations by alternative<br />

Federally Listed<br />

Species<br />

Southwestern willow<br />

flycatcher<br />

Southwestern willow<br />

flycatcher<br />

Critical Habitat<br />

Rationale for<br />

species<br />

determination<br />

Rationale for<br />

critical habitat<br />

determination<br />

Alt. B<br />

Existing<br />

Condition<br />

Determination by Alternative<br />

Alt. C Alt. D Alt. E Alt. F Alt. G<br />

*MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA<br />

MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA MANLAA<br />

Long-term beneficial effects under alternative E are greater than the<br />

other action alternatives. Under alternatives D, F and G, the effects<br />

are very similar, except for motorized big game retrieval, which has<br />

reduced effects in alternatives D and G; under alternative F, the<br />

access into these analysis areas is similar to alternative B. Under<br />

alternative C there is less of a reduction in motorized routes in<br />

southwestern willow flycatcher critical habitat and less a reduction<br />

in acres of potential habitat available to motorized big game<br />

retrieval in both analysis areas. southwestern willow flycatchers<br />

are associated with riparian type habitats that are more susceptible to<br />

damage by cross-country motorized use than upland habitats;<br />

therefore, the relative potential for big game retrieval to affect<br />

southwestern willow flycatcherhabitat is greater under alternative<br />

F and C than the other action alternatives. The four action<br />

alternatives do change the use within portions of each of the analysis<br />

areas, proposing administrative use. This change in use causes less<br />

effects than roads and trails open to all of the public. The level of<br />

potential effect under alternatives C, D, E, F, and G are reduced to<br />

an insignificant and discountable level; therefore, a determination of<br />

“may affect, not likely to adversely affect” is made for these the<br />

alternatives.<br />

All action alternatives reduce the level of effect to southwestern<br />

willow flycatcher critical habitat. Under all alternatives, the number<br />

of stream crossings remains the same, but the use is changed to<br />

administrative use only, reducing the level of effect to an<br />

insignificant and discountable level. For these reasons, a<br />

determination of “May affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” is<br />

made for designated southwestern willow flycatcher critical<br />

habitat.<br />

*MANLAA - May affect not likely to adversely affect; **MALAA- May affect likely to adversely affect determination<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!