13.08.2013 Views

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact South Fowl ...

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact South Fowl ...

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact South Fowl ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I am also approving the closure <strong>of</strong> Wooly’s Bluff Road to OHV <strong>and</strong> snowmobile<br />

use.<br />

Figure 5. Photo <strong>of</strong> a typical snowmobile in use today, generally a single rear track<br />

for propulsion <strong>and</strong> two front skis for steering. Machines with two or four tracks<br />

that are used for both propulsion <strong>and</strong> steering are not approved for use on this<br />

trail.<br />

As mentioned above, there will be only one route in use, either alternative 2 or 4. I am<br />

placing caveats with this decision that will allow flexibility to adapt to changing<br />

conditions. If there is cause to do so, the north route will be closed <strong>and</strong> obliterated <strong>and</strong><br />

then Alternative 4 will be constructed <strong>and</strong> used. To ensure successful implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

this decision, the Forest Service will continue to collaborate with Cook County<br />

Commissioners <strong>and</strong> Minnesota State DNR. Conditions indicating a need for change are:<br />

If at some point in the future, the State, County <strong>and</strong> Forest Service wish to put in a<br />

connecting system <strong>of</strong> snowmobile trails from the State grant in aid trails to the<br />

McFarl<strong>and</strong> or <strong>South</strong> <strong>Fowl</strong> Lakes area, then Alternative 2 would be closed <strong>and</strong><br />

Alterative 4 be constructed.<br />

If the Forest Service has determined that reasonable attempts to close the north<br />

route to OHVs are not effective, the trail will be closed <strong>and</strong> Alternative 4<br />

constructed (i.e. riders are cutting paths around closure devises or monitoring<br />

determines that OHV incursions are being made on the trail).<br />

If the BWCAW is physically breached by snowmobiles from Alternative 2 or OHV<br />

cannot be controlled on Alternative 2, this route will be closed <strong>and</strong> Alternative 4<br />

constructed.<br />

If analysis by the Forest Service <strong>and</strong> the State shows that use by snowmobiles <strong>of</strong><br />

the northern route exceeds its capability, it will be closed <strong>and</strong> rerouted to<br />

Alternative 4. The measure to determine this will be excessive resource damage or<br />

excessive interaction between snowmobiles.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!