13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Topic Alternative 1 – No Action<br />

Cultural and Historic<br />

Resources<br />

Cultural and Historic<br />

• No additional impacts to cultural<br />

resources from mine<br />

development, operation, and<br />

reclamation.<br />

• <strong>Impact</strong>s to cultural resources<br />

already occurring from livestock<br />

management and access to the<br />

area by the public would<br />

continue; these include<br />

vandalism, trampling, and<br />

inadvertent damage.<br />

• Adverse impacts to cultural<br />

resources would be less than<br />

significant.<br />

Alternative 2 – Proposed Action<br />

(Two-shaft alternative)<br />

occurred in the region and elsewhere.<br />

• Provided the global price of uranium<br />

remains favorable, several other<br />

reasonably <strong>for</strong>eseeable exploration and<br />

mining projects are also likely to occur.<br />

• Under this scenario, the projects in<br />

combination would support several billion<br />

dollars in economic activity, which would<br />

represent a significantly beneficial<br />

cumulative economic impact <strong>for</strong> the ROI<br />

over the coming decades, though perhaps<br />

not a source of permanent prosperity.<br />

• Would cause adverse impacts to tribal<br />

cultural resources and practices related to<br />

the sacred character of Mt. Taylor <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Acoma, Laguna, Zuni, Hopi, and Navajo<br />

in particular.<br />

• Would adversely affect the Mt. Taylor<br />

TCP and cause irreparable harm to<br />

surrounding tribes and their traditional<br />

cultural practices.<br />

• Would have a perceived impact upon the<br />

Spirit Beings associated with the TCP.<br />

• Would cause adverse effects in the view of<br />

the tribes because of concerns about the<br />

toxic nature of uranium and the perceived<br />

waste of water, the lifeblood of the sacred<br />

mountain.<br />

• Ground disturbance from construction<br />

activities would result in direct physical<br />

impacts to four historic properties, plus the<br />

Mt. Taylor TCP, which would be<br />

permanent and severe in magnitude.<br />

• Construction of mine facilities would<br />

Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action<br />

Alternative 3 – One-shaft<br />

Alternative<br />

• Direct and indirect impacts to historic<br />

properties and other cultural resources<br />

identified by the tribes would occur.<br />

• Direct and indirect adverse effects to<br />

historic properties, to natural features<br />

within the setting of historic properties,<br />

and to the visual and audible<br />

characteristics of historic property settings<br />

would occur.<br />

• Direct physical impacts would occur to<br />

four historic properties, plus the Mt. Taylor<br />

TCP.<br />

• During the operational phase, indirect<br />

physical disturbance of historic properties<br />

could occur from changed erosion patterns,<br />

inadvertent impacts, and vandalism or<br />

illegal artifact collecting.<br />

• Due to less development in Section 10 with<br />

less ground disturbance, fewer surface<br />

facilities, and less activity and traffic, the<br />

totality of the impacts to the Mt. Taylor<br />

TCP and related resources would be less<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!