13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action<br />

Visual Resources<br />

• None.<br />

Transportation<br />

• Implement BMPs as described in the mine operations plan.<br />

• Place construction staging areas where they would least interfere with traffic. All vehicles<br />

associated with mine development would be equipped with backing alarms, two-way<br />

radios, and slow moving vehicle signs when appropriate. Ore hauling trucks would be<br />

placarded and covered with tarps.<br />

Human Health and Safety<br />

• Implement company safety manual that outlines training and sets <strong>for</strong>th policies and<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> safe driving procedures such as onsite speed limits and no tolerance of<br />

drug or alcohol use.<br />

• Workers would shower and change clothes be<strong>for</strong>e leaving the mine facility, and work<br />

clothes would remain at the facility to be washed.<br />

• All trucks carrying ore materials would be sprayed down be<strong>for</strong>e leaving the site at the<br />

vehicle washing station located onsite.<br />

• Implement a detailed SPCC plan to train employees on safety procedures (see the mine<br />

operations plan <strong>for</strong> details).<br />

• Implement best practices <strong>for</strong> waste management.<br />

Alternatives Considered but<br />

Eliminated from Detailed Study<br />

Federal agencies are required by NEPA to rigorously explore and objectively evaluate all<br />

reasonable alternatives and to briefly discuss the reasons <strong>for</strong> eliminating any alternatives that<br />

were not developed in detail (40 CFR 1502.14). Public comments received in response to the<br />

proposed action provided suggestions <strong>for</strong> alternative methods <strong>for</strong> achieving the purpose and need.<br />

Some of these alternatives—such as developing renewable resources like wind and solar<br />

instead—were outside the immediate scope of the proposal. The Forest Service’s purpose and<br />

need regarding this project is to respond to the proposal to exercise <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong>’s statutory rights<br />

to enter public lands and mine these particular claims.<br />

Renewable Energy Development<br />

Development of renewable energy sources (such as wind and solar) on Cibola National Forest or<br />

elsewhere in the region, as an alternative to mining uranium at the <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> site, will not be<br />

considered in this EIS. While such projects may well have merit and be worth pursuing in their<br />

own right—and indeed are being developed in the area, such as the 102 MW Red Mesa Wind<br />

Energy Center in Cibola County (near Bibo)—they do not meet the Forest Service’s purpose and<br />

need as defined above.<br />

58 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!