Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination Van Citters Historic Preservation (subcontractor to Mangi) • Karen Van Citters, Principal • Kathy Roxlau, Cultural Resource Specialist Lee Wilson Wilson & Associates (subcontractor to Mangi) • Lee Wilson, President • Roger Miller, Hydrogeologist • Tom Parker, Geologist CDM Smith (subcontractor to Mangi) • Todd Bragdon, Associate, Program Manager • Kelly Collins, Water Resources Specialist • Mark Nelson, Geologist Environmental Restoration Group (ERG, subcontractor to Mangi) • Mike Schierman, Senior Health Physicist Habitat Health Impact Consulting (subcontractor to Mangi) • Marla Orenstein, Founding Partner • Ame-Lia Tamburrini, Health Impact Assessment Analyst LPES, Inc. (subcontractor to Mangi) • Tim Lavallee, P.E., President/Senior Engineer Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Agencies The Forest Service consulted the following individuals, Federal, State, and local agencies, tribes and non-Forest Service persons during the development of this environmental impact statement: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Dallas, Texas Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Washington, D.C. Bureau of Land Management • Brittany Gaudette, Geologist, Albuquerque Field Office 450 DEIS for Roca Honda Mine, Cibola National Forest
New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department, Mining and Minerals Division • Holland Shepherd, Program Manager • David Clark, Program Manager, Ecologist • James Hollen, Senior Reclamation Specialist New Mexico Environment Department • Kurt Vollbrecht, Geologist New Mexico State Land Office • David Eck, Archeologist New Mexico Office of the State Engineer • Jeffrey Peterson, Water Resource Specialist • Kevin Myers, Hydrologist New Mexico Department of Game and Fish • Rachel Jankowitz, Mining Habitat Specialist New Mexico Historic Preservation Division Tribes • Jan Biella, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer • Michelle Ensey, Archaeologist • Acoma Pueblo • Jemez Pueblo • Laguna Pueblo • Sandia Pueblo • Zuni Pueblo • Hopi Tribe • Jicarilla Apache Nation • Navajo Nation Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination DEIS for Roca Honda Mine, Cibola National Forest 451
Page 1 and 2:
United States Department of Agricul
Page 3 and 4:
Environmental Impact Statement for
Page 5 and 6:
Summary Roca Honda Resources, LLC (
Page 7 and 8:
• Potential effects on the charac
Page 9 and 10:
Mine Operation Summary Mine operati
Page 11 and 12:
Resource Impacts and Mitigation •
Page 13 and 14:
Resource Impacts and Mitigation num
Page 15 and 16:
Contents Chapter 1. Purpose of and
Page 17 and 18:
Contents Table 29. State of New Mex
Page 19 and 20:
Contents Table 94. Food stamp enrol
Page 21 and 22:
Contents Figure 66. Aerial image of
Page 23 and 24:
H1N1 Influenza A virus, subtype H1N
Page 25:
STD sexually transmitted disease SW
Page 28 and 29:
Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Chapter 2. Alternatives, Including
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Land Use Chapter 2. Alternatives, I
Page 85 and 86:
Treated Water Discharge in an Alter
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Table 3. Impact comparison matrix T
Page 91 and 92:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Res
Page 93 and 94:
Vegetation Topic Alternative 1 - No
Page 95 and 96:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Sen
Page 97 and 98:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Rec
Page 99 and 100:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Cul
Page 101 and 102:
Transportation Topic Alternative 1
Page 103 and 104:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Hum
Page 105 and 106:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Alt
Page 107 and 108:
Topic Alternative 1 - No Action Leg
Page 109 and 110:
Other Actions and Projects Consider
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Marquez Canyon Exploration Current
Page 115:
Page 118 and 119:
Chapter 3. Affected Environment and
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141:
Figure 33. Permit area watershed an
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Environmental Consequences Surface
Page 175 and 176:
Construction Phase Effects Chapter
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Table 12. Storm water controls for
Page 181 and 182:
Best Management Practices Chapter 3
Page 183 and 184:
Effects on Sediment Transport and D
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Figure 45. Modeled hydrograph for S
Page 199 and 200:
Figure 47. Modeled hydrograph for C
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Pollutant and Averaging Time Chapte
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Climate and Greenhouse Gases Chapte
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Regulatory Review Chapter 3. Affect
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Radon-222 Emissions Chapter 3. Affe
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 48. Vegetation communities i
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
State Listed Plant Species Chapter
Page 233 and 234:
Species Status Habitat and Distribu
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Common Name (Scientific name) Black
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Common Name (Scientific Name) Gunni
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Table 39. Criteria for rating impac
Page 257 and 258:
Wildlife Mortality Chapter 3. Affec
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Table 40. Impact characterization f
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Transportation Chapter 3. Affected
Page 285 and 286:
Figure 57. Nearby recreation sites
Page 287 and 288:
Table 41. Impact characterization f
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Minority Populations Chapter 3. Aff
Page 293 and 294:
Figure 58. Distribution of minority
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
High school graduates, percent of p
Page 309 and 310:
Earnings Chapter 3. Affected Enviro
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Public Finance Chapter 3. Affected
Page 315 and 316:
providing an estimate of the “rip
Page 317 and 318:
Tax Revenue Chapter 3. Affected Env
Page 319 and 320:
Table 61. Household characteristics
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Tribal History Chapter 3. Affected
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Natural Resources Chapter 3. Affect
Page 347 and 348:
Physical APE Chapter 3. Affected En
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Agricultural Fields Chapter 3. Affe
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
• Removal of a property from its
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Impacts to Natural Resources with C
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Site No. Project Section Land Statu
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Visual Resources Affected Environme
Page 389 and 390:
Figure 64. View looking north from
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Alternative 1 Chapter 3. Affected E
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Environmental Consequences Chapter
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
New Mexico 1.11 (0.98 - 1.25) Cibol
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426: Chapter 3. Affected Environment and
Page 429 and 430: Magnitude Descriptor Precedence or
Page 433 and 434: Noise Chapter 3. Affected Environme
Page 471 and 472: Resource Area Cultural and Historic
Page 473: Cumulative Effects Chapter 3. Affec
Page 478 and 479: Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordin
Page 481 and 482: Glossary Air-Quality Control Region
Page 483 and 484: References Cited (ACHP, 2005). Advi
Page 485 and 486: References Cited (Basin Coordinated
Page 487 and 488: References Cited (Brugge et al., 20
Page 489 and 490: References Cited (Census, 2011). U.
Page 491 and 492: References Cited (DesertUSA, 2011).
Page 493 and 494: References Cited (Gordon, 1961). Go
Page 495 and 496: References Cited (Jackson, 2002). J
Page 497 and 498: References Cited (Lyford et al., 19
Page 499 and 500: (NatureServe, 2010a). NatureSevere.
Page 501 and 502: References Cited (NMDH, 2010c) New
Page 503 and 504: References Cited (NRGNHA, 2011). No
Page 505 and 506: References Cited (RHR, 2011a). Roca
Page 507 and 508: References Cited (Stacier and Guzy,
Page 509 and 510: References Cited (USEPA, 1975). U.S
Page 511 and 512: References Cited (USFS, 2001). U.S.
Page 513 and 514: References Cited (USFWS, no date).
Page 515: References Cited (WildEarth Guardia
Page 518 and 519: Index E economic impacts - 15, 73,
Page 520 and 521: Index N National Environmental Poli
Page 522: Index W waste - 18, 40, 46, 56-57,
show all

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?