13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Alternative 3<br />

Under alternative 3, the underground uranium mine would be constructed with only one<br />

production shaft located in Section 16. The majority of the facilities would also be in Section 16,<br />

with some pipeline and dewatering facilities in Section 10 and ventilation shafts in all three<br />

sections. The maximum area of impacts would be the viewshed <strong>for</strong> the shaft headframe, as it is<br />

the tallest facility in the proposed mine plan. Figure 69 shows in red the areas that would have<br />

their viewshed altered by the one shaft alternative. This viewshed is smaller than that of the<br />

proposed action, in that Section 10 itself, and areas northwest, north, northeast and east of Section<br />

10, would not be impacted as they were in the two shaft alternative. This difference in number of<br />

headframes is the main determiner <strong>for</strong> the difference in the VMS analysis of visual impacts<br />

between the two action alternatives. Notably, however, in a simply subjective sense, the absence<br />

of duplicative mine facilities (which would be needed to support a second shaft in Section 10) has<br />

an obvious advantage when compared to the impacts to visual resources from alternative 2. That<br />

said, they both fit within the small level <strong>for</strong> extent of impacts according to the VMS. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

the impact level and significance values are identical <strong>for</strong> both alternatives, as seen in table 73.<br />

Table 73. Levels of impact <strong>for</strong> visual resources<br />

Magnitude Duration Extent Likelihood<br />

<strong>Mine</strong> Development<br />

Precedence<br />

and<br />

Uniqueness<br />

<strong>Impact</strong><br />

Rating<br />

Moderate Medium Term Small Probable Severe Insignificant<br />

<strong>Mine</strong> Operation<br />

Moderate Long Term Small Probable Severe Insignificant<br />

<strong>Mine</strong> Reclamation<br />

Minor Medium Term Small Probable Severe Insignificant<br />

Overall<br />

Moderate Long Term Small Probable Severe Insignificant<br />

Cumulative Effects<br />

Past and current human activities and artificial structures in the area have altered the appearance<br />

of the natural landscape within the viewshed of the proposed mine. Activities include mining,<br />

logging, ranching, and structures include paved and unpaved roads, the village of San Mateo,<br />

ranch houses and homes, sheds, barns, water storage tanks and facilities, fences, electrical<br />

transmission and distribution lines, abandoned or closed mines, and tailings piles. From the<br />

higher reaches and summit of Mt. Taylor, these and many other structures would be visible.<br />

Nonetheless, <strong>for</strong> most observers, the overall visual impression of the landscape would be one that<br />

is relatively open and uncluttered, even semiwild, though not pristine wilderness.<br />

370 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!