13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Site No.<br />

Project<br />

Section<br />

Land Status<br />

Criteria <strong>for</strong><br />

Eligibility<br />

Source/Project Facility<br />

160744 NA private D Construction of dewatering discharge<br />

pipeline and storage tank.<br />

162763 16 NMSLO D Stock piles, haul road, and reclamation<br />

activities<br />

165884 20 private D Construction of haul road.<br />

Cumulative Effects<br />

Both action alternatives are expected to result in adverse effects to historic properties, including<br />

the Mt. Taylor TCP, and significant impacts to other important cultural resources and to<br />

traditional cultural practices. These impacts and effects would include physical damage to the<br />

resources, and damage to physical features within the setting of the resources, resulting from<br />

activities conducted during construction, operations, and reclamation phases. The introduction of<br />

visual and audible elements out of character with the resources would also impact the resources.<br />

These impacts would derive from the surface activities conducted during all three phases, from<br />

the presence of modern facilities in the rural environment, and from the changes to the natural<br />

landscape. Traditional cultural practices would be affected due to physical disturbance of the<br />

cultural and natural resources in the project area during construction, operation, and reclamation.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong>s to practices would also occur from extraction of ore, dewatering, and the surface<br />

activities being conducted. These overall impacts would be significant, and either action<br />

alternative would result in an adverse effect to historic properties.<br />

In compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA, the Forest Service would develop a programmatic<br />

agreement in consultation with the ACHP and the consulting parties. This programmatic<br />

agreement would define measures to be implemented to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse<br />

effects to historic properties, and to address impacts to other cultural resources and practices.<br />

While the adverse effects would remain, the mitigation measures would resolve these effects per<br />

36 CFR Part 800. However, the impact to cultural resources overall and traditional cultural<br />

practices would remain significant.<br />

Past, present, and reasonably <strong>for</strong>eseeable projects within the Mt. Taylor area are described in<br />

chapter 2. Some of these projects are those that are proposed and conducted by the Forest Service<br />

to maintain the health of the <strong>for</strong>est and its resources, and facilitate use and enjoyment of the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

by the public. These projects, which occur periodically throughout the <strong>for</strong>est, include wildlife<br />

habitat improvements, wildland fire management, improvements <strong>for</strong> livestock grazing,<br />

maintenance of recreational facilities such as trails, picnic areas, and campgrounds, and<br />

maintenance of roads. Other projects are conducted by non-Agency project proponents, and<br />

include timber harvesting and maintenance of utility corridors and communications sites. Due to<br />

the type and scale of these projects, and the review conducted by the Forest Service prior to<br />

initiating them, these projects are designed to minimize the potential <strong>for</strong> impacts to cultural<br />

resources, per the land and resource management plan (USFS, 1985). All such projects undergo<br />

review through the Section 106 compliance process and ef<strong>for</strong>ts are made to avoid or minimize<br />

potential effects. As such, these projects usually result in minor or no impacts to cultural<br />

resources. General activities conducted by the public on Forest Service lands include firewood<br />

358 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!