13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Site No.<br />

Project<br />

Section<br />

Land<br />

Status<br />

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Criteria <strong>for</strong><br />

Eligibility<br />

Source/Project Facility<br />

162763 16 NMSLO D Stock piles, haul road, and reclamation<br />

activities<br />

165884 20 private D Construction of haul road.<br />

Alternative 3<br />

This section describes the impacts of the one shaft alternative on cultural resources. Under this<br />

alternative, only one mine shaft and associated facilities would be constructed. Mining<br />

development, operation, and reclamation would occur primarily on Section 16, with vent shafts<br />

and safety features in Sections 9 and 10. The direct and indirect impacts to cultural resources<br />

identified by the involved tribes (described above) would occur under this alternative. <strong>Impact</strong>s to<br />

springs, groundwater, wildlife, and vegetation, all as resources infused with cultural meaning and<br />

value, would occur under this alternative. Also, direct and indirect adverse effects (described<br />

above) to historic properties, to features within the setting of historic properties, and to the visual<br />

and audible characteristics of the setting of the Mt. Taylor TCP would occur. Specific direct<br />

physical damage to historic properties under this alternative are displayed in table 69. Under<br />

alternative 3, direct physical damage would be expected to occur to the same four historic<br />

properties as alternative 2, plus the Mt. Taylor TCP. Because there would be no mine shaft and<br />

associated facilities in Section 10, the extent of direct physical damage to the Mt. Taylor TCP<br />

would be less under this alternative. An additional 33 historic properties could be at varying<br />

levels of risk <strong>for</strong> indirect effects from erosion, inadvertent damage, and vandalism or looting,<br />

based on their proximity to the proposed project facilities and mine activities.<br />

Because of the reduction in surface facilities constructed in Section 10, which would mean less<br />

ground disturbance, fewer surface facilities, and less activity and traffic, the totality of the<br />

impacts and effects to the Mt. Taylor TCP and the resources and historic properties in that area<br />

would be less under this alternative. However, the impacts of this alternative on cultural resources<br />

would still be significant, and the proposed project would result in an adverse effect to historic<br />

properties.<br />

Table 69. Historic properties that would be directly physically damaged under alternative 3<br />

(one shaft alternative)<br />

Site No.<br />

Mt. Taylor<br />

Traditional<br />

Cultural<br />

Property<br />

LA 156475<br />

Project<br />

Section<br />

16, 9, 10,<br />

11, 2<br />

Land Status<br />

Federal and<br />

NMSLO<br />

(portions outside<br />

of project area<br />

include private<br />

lands)<br />

Criteria <strong>for</strong><br />

Eligibility<br />

Source/Project Facility<br />

A, B, and D Construction of surface facilities in Sections<br />

9, 10, 11, and 2. Extraction of mineralized<br />

ore under Sections 9, 10, and 16.<br />

Reclamation of surface facilities in Sections<br />

9, 10, 11, and 2.<br />

78873 16 NMSLO D Construction of haul road and perimeter<br />

fence.<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest 357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!