13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Indian Sacred Sites<br />

The involved tribes consulted <strong>for</strong> this EIS do not make a clear distinction between what others<br />

call “sacred” and “secular.” In tribal communities, terms such as sacred, spiritual, ceremonial,<br />

religious, and ritualistic do not distinguish an activity, place, or object into a realm that is separate<br />

from daily life. The activities, places, and objects given these descriptors “are pervasive in these<br />

tribal communities and in their ways of living and thinking, and are seen by the tribes themselves<br />

as inseparable from their daily activities” (Benedict and Hudson, 2008:17). Sacred sites are not<br />

solitary, but rather are linked together by a set of religious relationships that are part of the<br />

cultural makeup of the group; this results in a holistic sacred geography that is a fundamental part<br />

of and context <strong>for</strong> the everyday lives of the individuals in the group. Gulli<strong>for</strong>d (2000:68) explains<br />

that “Sacred sites remain integral to tribal histories, religions, and identities . . .”, and Benedict<br />

and Hudson reiterate that tribes’ activities at sacred sites “are simply expressions of cultural<br />

practices that are part of a larger continuum of activity that defines their cultural identity”<br />

(2008:31).<br />

However, <strong>for</strong> the purposes of this EIS and its analysis, sacred sites must meet the definition in<br />

Executive Order 13007, Indian Sacred Sites. This order addresses Federal land managing agency<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> accommodating access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites by Indian<br />

religious practitioners and avoiding adversely affecting the physical integrity of such sacred sites.<br />

Sacred sites are defined in the executive order as:<br />

“Any specific, discrete, narrowly delineated location on Federal land that is<br />

identified by an Indian tribe, or Indian individual determined to be an<br />

appropriately authoritative representative of an Indian religion, as sacred by<br />

virtue of its established religious significance to, or ceremonial use by, an Indian<br />

religion; provided that the tribe or appropriately authoritative representative of an<br />

Indian religion has in<strong>for</strong>med the agency of the existence of such a site.”<br />

(Executive Order 13007, 61 FR 26771, Section 1, Part (b)(iii))<br />

Some places are considered sacred due to their association with traditional religious activities.<br />

The activity itself in that place imbues the place with sacredness. Other places are sacred by<br />

definition, whether an activity occurs there or not. Sacred narratives often define sacred places by<br />

their role in origin stories, stories of spiritual beings or cultural heroes, or stories about the origins<br />

of ceremonies, sacred instructions, and sacred objects. Some sacred places are required to be<br />

visited, and maintain their sacredness through physical or spiritual use. Other sacred places are<br />

specifically <strong>for</strong>bidden to be visited, perhaps by certain groups of people, or only visited by those<br />

who are properly prepared through prayer or ceremony. Such places are never truly abandoned,<br />

even if not visited in person. Use of a sacred site can be determined through a traditional religious<br />

calendar, or can be sporadic, determined when conditions require it. In many instances, visitation<br />

to a sacred site requires privacy, and the places and objects left there need to remain undisturbed<br />

in order to fulfill their function within the traditional belief system of the tribe.<br />

Ultimately, and per the Executive Order, sacredness of a place is defined by the group to whom it<br />

is sacred. It is important to note that there is no review of such determinations by a Federal<br />

agency (ACHP, 2005). For all of the involved tribes, Mt. Taylor is considered in and of itself to be<br />

a sacred site in its entirety, one that is currently used <strong>for</strong> ceremonial activities, and which plays a<br />

distinctive role in the religion and cultural traditions of the tribes. The tribes view Mt. Taylor and<br />

its associated lands in a holistic manner, referring to it as a sacred landscape that includes<br />

land<strong>for</strong>ms, rocks, soil, sand, water, springs, tinajas, drainages, plants, animals, archaeological<br />

336 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!