13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

social meaning by people associated with them”, and such a landscape is “a relatively contiguous<br />

area of interrelated places that contemporary cultural groups define as meaningful because it is<br />

inextricably and traditionally linked to their own local or regional histories, cultural identities,<br />

beliefs, and behaviors” (Evans et al., 2001: 53-54). Such landscape is a geographically definable<br />

area possessing a concentration, linkage, or continuity of landscape components. It is based upon<br />

an integrative perspective that examines relationships among natural and cultural features.<br />

The importance of a landscape and the individual components therein arises from the<br />

interrelationships between cultural resources and natural resources such as plants, animals,<br />

minerals, land<strong>for</strong>ms, and bodies of water that give the landscape meaning through their<br />

association with a people’s history and cultural identity. Within the landscape, often the space in<br />

between individual components is in itself meaningful. Landscapes provide a framework within<br />

which to map the relationships between people and the landscape’s resources. A landscape that is<br />

culturally significant to one group may contain elements that are significant to other groups in<br />

other ways within their own culturally defined landscape. The distinction of ethnographic<br />

landscapes lies in what makes the landscape significant and who determines the nature of that<br />

significance. Ethnographic landscapes are identified and defined by the cultural groups associated<br />

with them and are not rooted in historic analysis. Such landscapes are not rooted in the NRHP, are<br />

not pitted against defined criteria of significance, and are not dependent upon NRHP eligibility<br />

<strong>for</strong> their existence or importance.<br />

Landscapes in the Region of Influence<br />

There are five defined ethnographic landscapes that overlap the proposed project area and the<br />

region of influence. The analysis presented in the Mt. Taylor Cultural Property nomination<br />

(Chestnut Law Offices, 2009: Continuation Sheet, Section 15, page 2) describes how the<br />

landscapes associated with traditional land use <strong>for</strong> each of the involved tribes (Pueblos of Acoma,<br />

Laguna, and Zuni, Hopi Tribe, and Navajo Nation) encompass the region of influence, with all<br />

five overlapping at Mt. Taylor and the proposed project area. These landscapes are vernacular in<br />

origin, meaning that the cultural and natural resources within the landscapes and the distribution<br />

of those resources across the landscapes, evolved through function or use, reflecting the physical<br />

circumstances and cultural character of daily life, and are demonstrative of past land uses rather<br />

than a conscious planned design. The cultural resources, their spatial organization, and their<br />

relationship and connection to natural resources and land<strong>for</strong>ms demonstrate and in<strong>for</strong>m about<br />

how this area was used and why it developed the way it did over time. Additionally, the patterns<br />

of land use shown by this landscape <strong>for</strong>m a context <strong>for</strong> the traditional histories and beliefs of the<br />

involved tribes and a foundation <strong>for</strong> group identity.<br />

In the ROI, the juxtaposition of mountain slopes, the San Mateo Valley, and the low-lying mesas<br />

influenced how this area was used, and this use is demonstrated by the types and distribution of<br />

archaeological remains, other culturally important resources, and natural resources within the<br />

landscape. Evidence of land use points to hunting, gathering of plant and mineral resources,<br />

farming, herding, and use of the area <strong>for</strong> ceremonial activities. Archaeological remains indicate a<br />

variety of habitations, from temporary use of camp sites and rock shelters, to more substantial<br />

structures that point to long term or repeated seasonal use.<br />

Based on previous studies as well as the resource identification work conducted <strong>for</strong> this EIS, the<br />

types of cultural and natural resources associated with the ethnographic landscapes and located<br />

within the area of overlap is expected to include habitation sites (villages, family hamlets, field<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest 317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!