13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

effect. The Forest Service will provide this document to the ACHP and the consulting parties <strong>for</strong><br />

their review and input. Upon consideration of and response to the input received, the Forest<br />

Service will finalize the document and submit it to the NMSHPO <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal Section 106 review<br />

and consultation. When concurrence by the NMSHPO on the Forest Service’s determinations has<br />

been received, the Forest Service will consult with the ACHP and the consulting parties to<br />

develop a programmatic agreement to resolve adverse effects to historic properties. This<br />

programmatic agreement will be incorporated into the final EIS and the Forest Service’s record of<br />

decision.<br />

Cultural Resources in the Region of Influence<br />

As a result of the cultural resource investigations, tribal consultation, and input received from the<br />

Section 106 consulting parties, the Forest Service has identified cultural resources located within<br />

the region of influence (i.e., the physical and setting APEs). These resources are described in this<br />

section.<br />

The Forest Service appreciates that the definitions and boundaries applied to cultural resources by<br />

the Forest Service are meaningful mainly from scientific and management perspectives. Such<br />

definitions and boundaries are necessary <strong>for</strong> assessing the impacts and effects of the proposed<br />

project, managing these cultural resources <strong>for</strong> the long term, and <strong>for</strong> compliance with various<br />

laws, regulations, etc. The Forest Service recognizes the complexity inherent when resources<br />

overlap, and when the significance of those resources is tied to multiple cultures of use.<br />

Depending on one’s viewpoint, the boundaries may be different or even nonexistent, the<br />

separation between resource types or groupings may not exist, and the many relationships<br />

between resources may vary to reflect the perspectives of the people to whom the resources are<br />

important. The Forest Service also recognizes that these varied perspectives are not exclusive,<br />

and can often contribute together to a fuller definition of historical and cultural importance.<br />

As described earlier, the Forest Service has some additional work to complete between the draft<br />

and final EISs to define cultural resources located within the ROI. This work will have varying<br />

levels of impact on the in<strong>for</strong>mation presented in this section. Recording of additional<br />

archaeological resources, with some recorded as new sites and others incorporated into existing<br />

sites, may result in changes to the number of archaeological resources or changes to the sizes of<br />

some resources. Review by the consulting parties of the dewatering discharge pipeline survey<br />

report and the archaeological testing report could result in changes to the eligibility of some<br />

resources. The geomorphological study, which is addressing the potential <strong>for</strong> deeply buried<br />

archaeological deposits, could result in changes to what is known about the nature, number, or<br />

extent of some archaeological resources. Continued consultation by the Forest Service with the<br />

tribes could provide additional in<strong>for</strong>mation about cultural resources in the ROI. Finally, the Forest<br />

Service will use the in<strong>for</strong>mation collected through resource investigations, tribal consultation, and<br />

consulting party input to prepare a Section 106 compliance document that presents and supports<br />

the Forest Service’s determinations of resource eligibility and project effect. The review and input<br />

of the ACHP and the consulting parties on this document could result in changes to the<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation presented in this section.<br />

The involved tribes have expressed concern that potentially not every single cultural resource<br />

within the APEs has been identified and recorded. Missing in<strong>for</strong>mation about cultural resources<br />

<strong>for</strong> such a large project can be due to the challenges of conducting fieldwork, difficulties of<br />

translation of traditional concepts or government standards between tribal languages and English,<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest 315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!