13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

location where the Section 10 production shaft described in the proposed action would have been<br />

constructed.<br />

The resulting differences in land use effects from implementing alternative 3 arise from<br />

elimination of the second shaft along with a considerable amount of surface facilities and<br />

infrastructure. There is a reduction of area disturbed by the project, or its footprint, of 63 acres,<br />

mostly in Section 10. This includes a reduction from three to two ventilation shafts in Section 9.<br />

Access roads in Sections 9 and 10 service ventilation shafts and monitoring wells only and are<br />

reduced somewhat in overall length and number of locations serviced. Utility corridors and access<br />

roads across private lands in Sections 11, 15, 17, and 20 are still required.<br />

The effects of alternative 3, the one shaft alternative identified above, are relatively similar in<br />

scale to those of alternative 2, the two shaft alternative, but on a somewhat smaller scale. In the<br />

following discussion of differing changes to the land management issues and opportunities from<br />

the <strong>for</strong>est plan, the effects are determined to be the same as <strong>for</strong> alternative 2 except as specifically<br />

noted.<br />

Range Management<br />

In alternative 3, 63 fewer acres are required <strong>for</strong> mine development, operations, and reclamation<br />

that are potentially available to other uses, presumably the current land uses of grazing<br />

management, firewood gathering, and hunting, subject again to maintaining a safe buffer with<br />

mine site activities as provided in alternative 2.<br />

Soil and Water<br />

There would be a reduced requirement to disturb native ground and less impermeable area with<br />

alternative 2 because of the fewer surface facilities and slightly reduced road lengths. This will<br />

mean there are reduced instances of BMPs employed to maintain higher levels of water quality<br />

and soil retention. The net outcome is that fewer acres are disturbed and a smaller amount of soil<br />

and water resources is affected.<br />

Recreation<br />

Some current recreational activities such as firewood gathering, hunting, and hiking could be<br />

allowed at a slightly increased level than that of alternative 2 because of the fact that fewer<br />

facilities will be built and less area fenced. It is possible that the addition of 63 acres of land not<br />

developed by the mine would not influence a decision about higher levels of hunting activity<br />

because of the extended range of possible unsafe effects <strong>for</strong> hunting.<br />

<strong>Mine</strong>rals Management<br />

There are no meaningful differences between alternatives 2 and 3 perceived <strong>for</strong> minerals<br />

management, as the mineral resource will be extracted to the same extent through a more<br />

extensive range of subsurface activity.<br />

256 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!