13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

behavior change, habitat loss, or mortality is not expected to reduce the overall population in the<br />

Cibola National Forest or surrounding areas and would not result in a trend toward Federal<br />

listing.<br />

While no surveys found any American peregrine falcons in the permit area, suitable habitat<br />

exists <strong>for</strong> both hunting and nesting. <strong>Impact</strong>s to the falcon would be the same as the impacts to<br />

other migratory birds discussed below. Nesting habitat is limited in the area and would be<br />

restricted to arroyo canyons and cliffs. Displacement of the falcon during the breeding season<br />

could have major adverse effects to the falcon in the area. BMPs and mitigation ef<strong>for</strong>ts not<br />

included in the Plans of Operations would be needed to minimize effects to the American<br />

peregrine falcon if this species is found during mining development or operation. These<br />

mitigation ef<strong>for</strong>ts include contacting the Forest Service and developing appropriate avoidance and<br />

minimization measures if a migratory bird nest is discovered during mining operations.<br />

Mitigation measures could include working around the nest site as feasible to avoid disturbance<br />

or developing a mitigation and monitoring plan that may include timing restrictions during the<br />

peregrine breeding season.<br />

Hypothetically, raptors like the falcon would also be most susceptible to adverse effects from<br />

bioaccumulation of uranium and other radionuclides; however, as noted earlier, proper handling<br />

and management, as proposed, would likely avoid these effects altogether. Overall long-term,<br />

adverse effects are anticipated to range from minor to moderate in magnitude and medium to<br />

large in extent as long as proper mitigation ef<strong>for</strong>ts were taken if this species was discovered.<br />

Effects would be possible and slight to moderate in precedence. If American peregrine falcon<br />

mortality or nest destruction resulted from mine development or operation, effects to this species<br />

would be major in magnitude.<br />

Forest Service Sensitive Species<br />

At least four small to large Gunnison’s prairie dog towns exist on the project area. During<br />

surveys, these towns appeared to be healthy (RHR, 2009d). Possible direct adverse effects would<br />

be similar to effects to general wildlife and could occur from mineral exploration; clearing and<br />

crushing vegetation; habitat loss due to surface facilities, pipeline, power lines, and road<br />

development as well as from well operation; fragmentation of available habitat; displacement and<br />

mortality of prairie dogs; alteration of surface water drainage; and increased compaction of soils<br />

(CODNR, 2010). Because there is limited surface water on the permit area, alteration of surface<br />

water in this area is not anticipated.<br />

Indirect effects of mineral development could include increased exposure to shooters and OHV<br />

users because of improved road access into the area and invasion of habitats by invasive weeds. A<br />

potential beneficial impact to the prairie dog would be the reduction in shrub cover through<br />

blading and grading, enhancing the available prairie dogs habitat. The use of BMPs would also<br />

help protect prairie dogs. Speed limits of 15 mph would reduce the amount of vehicle collisions<br />

and fencing around the mine shaft would help to keep prairie dogs out of the mine. In 2008, the<br />

USFWS published a “12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Gunnison’s Prairie Dog as<br />

Threatened or Endangered.” The USFWS found that this species is not threatened or endangered<br />

throughout all of its range, but that the portion of the current range of the species located in<br />

central and south-central Colorado and north-central New Mexico represents a significant portion<br />

of the range where the Gunnison’s prairie dog is warranted <strong>for</strong> listing under the ESA (USFWS,<br />

2008). The Gunnison’s prairie dogs found within the project area are not warranted <strong>for</strong> listing<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest 239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!