13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Common<br />

Name<br />

MIS<br />

Habitat<br />

Type<br />

Mule deer Piñonjuniper<br />

Juniper<br />

titmouse<br />

Piñonjuniper<br />

Acres in<br />

Sections 9,<br />

10, and 16<br />

Habitat Description<br />

376 Early stages of plant<br />

succession with an<br />

abundance of browse plants<br />

are more beneficial to mule<br />

deer than late stages.<br />

Mixtures of plant species are<br />

preferable to single species<br />

plant communities. Food<br />

requirements <strong>for</strong> deer<br />

average about 5 to 7 pounds<br />

of green <strong>for</strong>age per day.<br />

376 The juniper titmouse prefers<br />

warm, dry habitats of open<br />

piñon-juniper woodland<br />

sometimes mixed with oak.<br />

It is most common where<br />

juniper is dominant and<br />

where large, mature trees are<br />

present to provide cavities<br />

<strong>for</strong> nesting.<br />

Existing<br />

Forestwide<br />

Habitat Trend<br />

Stable Down<br />

Stable Down<br />

Existing<br />

Forestwide<br />

Population<br />

Trend<br />

In the “Cibola National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan” (LRMP) Rocky Mountain<br />

elk was selected as a management indicator species <strong>for</strong> the mountain grasslands and mixed<br />

conifer habitat found on the <strong>for</strong>est. The justification <strong>for</strong> this selection reads as follows: “Elk –<br />

grazer, fairly adaptable, not representative over entire <strong>for</strong>est, however, a good indicator of<br />

meadow types in those areas where it does appear. Easily monitored and identified. Is a species of<br />

high public interest and can be managed <strong>for</strong>.”<br />

At the time the LRMP was approved in 1985, elk were a popular, but not necessarily widespread<br />

game species. Elk numbers were considered an index <strong>for</strong> the extent and health of the mountain<br />

grasslands and mixed conifer habitat types. Limiting factors at the time the Cibola LRMP was<br />

approved were believed to be hiding cover (mixed conifer) and <strong>for</strong>age (mountain meadows). It is<br />

now recognized that elk are far more adaptable than previously believed, and occupy a wide<br />

variety of habitats at all times of the year.<br />

Elk are grazers as well as browsers and their diet consists of shrubs, trees, and grasses. Starting in<br />

spring, elk migrate up to higher mountain pastures and as mating season begins, the elk move<br />

back to lower valleys. During winter they inhabit wooded slopes and dense woods of the lower<br />

valleys (eduscapes, 1999). Suitable grazing, calving, and winter range habitat exists within the<br />

permit area. Rocky Mountain elk appear to have been successfully reintroduced in many places<br />

throughout its range and existing <strong>for</strong>estwide population trend is up within the Cibola National<br />

Forest (USFS, 2005 MIS Report) .<br />

Rocky Mountain elk were documented in the site during all survey periods. Suitable grazing,<br />

calving, and winter range habitat exists within the permit area (RHR, 2009d). In the Cibola<br />

LRMP EIS, page 142, mountain grasslands were determined to cover approximately 1 percent of<br />

222 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!