13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

water due to WTP upsets, or discharge of treated water at uncontrolled locations because of<br />

pipeline upsets. Each of the ponds has the capacity to store a 12-hour flow of 8,000 gpm, and the<br />

ponds are plumbed so as to be interchangeable in function; that is, up to a maximum of 36 hours<br />

of retention is possible <strong>for</strong> the design maximum WTP discharge, the WTP influent water, or any<br />

combination of the two. During normal operation, a single discharge pond and the plant feed<br />

surge pond would be on standby. Backup power would be installed.<br />

Additional controls now in the plans include the following; see also discussion of “Surface Water<br />

<strong>Impact</strong>s.”<br />

• All locations where potentially toxic materials are to be stored would be lined or have a<br />

concrete floor and drain to lined ponds which, in turn, discharge to the water treatment<br />

plant.<br />

• Storm water is routed such that it would not run onto areas of potential contamination<br />

(e.g., it is diverted around stockpiles).<br />

• Septic tank wastes, which were a problem at the Mt. Taylor mine, would be piped to the<br />

water treatment plant, and would not be discharged through local leach fields.<br />

• Fueling and vehicle maintenance would occur in designated areas or distant from<br />

drainways, would be on level areas, and always supervised.<br />

• Plans to prevent and control spills would be developed, including a storm water pollution<br />

protection plan. Among other protocols, the plans would require training of personnel,<br />

sampling of possible release, and availability of cleanup materials and equipment onsite.<br />

Details on management of drilling fluids and cuttings are not complete, but are expected to<br />

involve standard practices with use of short-term pits followed by restoration. Details on<br />

discharge of treated wastewater to private land <strong>for</strong> use in a ranching enterprise are not available.<br />

This use would probably result in substantial seepage of treated mine water to groundwater.<br />

Provided the water has been treated to safe levels as planned, there would be no adverse impact to<br />

groundwater quality.<br />

An important component of any NMED approval would be requirements to monitor potential<br />

discharges. The monitoring program as now proposed includes routine inspection of operating<br />

and storage areas, instrumentation of key equipment (as an example, pressure sensors on<br />

discharge pipelines), and monitoring wells. Monitoring wells are proposed <strong>for</strong> overall monitoring<br />

of the process areas, including components that do not include leak detection systems per se—<strong>for</strong><br />

example, the lined retention ponds that drain the stockpiles.<br />

In the area of the Section 16 facilities, RHR proposes four monitoring wells be completed in the<br />

unsaturated zone, one each adjacent to the three retention ponds and one adjacent to the WTP<br />

ponds.<br />

In the unlikely event that significant contamination reached groundwater, it would be detected by<br />

one of the three monitoring wells completed in the Gallup. Monitoring well locations are not yet<br />

available <strong>for</strong> the Section 10 facilities, but would be identified in a future NMED permit (e.g.<br />

renewal of the initial permit). This would be prior to any mining in that section.<br />

An important monitoring provision would be a requirement <strong>for</strong> a post-mine radiological survey, a<br />

measure recently identified by MMD (Clark, 2012). If such a survey also provided <strong>for</strong> evaluation<br />

178 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!