13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contents<br />

Table 94. Food stamp enrollment in Cibola and McKinley Counties, 2008-2010 ................... 400<br />

Table 95. Health care insurance and access to health care services .......................................... 401<br />

Table 96. Smoking rates in Cibola and McKinley County ....................................................... 402<br />

Table 97. <strong>Impact</strong> characterization <strong>for</strong> public health and safety ................................................ 402<br />

Table 98. MSHA-recorded injuries <strong>for</strong> underground<br />

uranium mining in the United States, 2006–2009..................................................... 422<br />

Table 99. Uranium worker compensation – April 1992 through June 2007 ............................. 439<br />

Table 100. Unavoidable adverse effects of the three alternatives considered ............................ 443<br />

List of Figures<br />

Figure 1. Jesus Mesa viewed from the south (Section 16)<br />

in the vicinity of the proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> ........................................................ 2<br />

Figure 2. Proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> permit area location map ................................................. 4<br />

Figure 3. Vicinity map of the proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> permit area ...................................... 5<br />

Figure 5. Open house scoping meeting in Gallup, Dec. 16, 2010 ................................................ 9<br />

Figure 4. Open house scoping meeting in Grants, December 14, 2010 ....................................... 9<br />

Figure 6. Cibola National Forest and Grasslands vicinity map .................................................. 20<br />

Figure 7. Mt. Taylor from Acoma Pueblo 20 miles to the south................................................ 21<br />

Figure 8. Looking southeast from the project site toward Mt. Taylor ....................................... 21<br />

Figure 9. New Mexico Environment Department discharge permit process ............................. 23<br />

Figure 10. Flow chart of Section 106 review process .................................................................. 27<br />

Figure 11. Parallel NEPA and Section 106 processes with points of interaction ......................... 28<br />

Figure 12. Regional map depicting proposed<br />

<strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> within northern New Mexico ........................................................ 32<br />

Figure 13. View of project area from Section 10 ......................................................................... 33<br />

Figure 14. Power line crossing Section 16 portion of project site ................................................ 33<br />

Figure 15. Proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> – layout of surface facilities .......................................... 35<br />

Figure 16. Layout of surface facilities in Section 16 <strong>for</strong> the proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> .......... 36<br />

Figure 17. Layout of surface facilities in Section 9 <strong>for</strong> the proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> Min .............. 37<br />

Figure 18. Layout of surface facilities in Section 10 <strong>for</strong> the proposed <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> .......... 38<br />

Figure 19. Uranium mine tunnel and haul equipment at Mining Museum in Grants ................... 46<br />

Figure 20. Layout of surface facilities under alternative 3 (one productive shaft alternative) ..... 53<br />

Figure 21. Arroyo originally intended to receive treated water<br />

from <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> at approximate point of discharge ........................................ 59<br />

Figure 22. Bottom of same unnamed arroyo originally intended <strong>for</strong> water discharge ................. 60<br />

Figure 23. JJ No. 1/L-Bar <strong>Mine</strong> site (after reclamation) .............................................................. 84<br />

Figure 24. South-north cross-section of Ambrosia Lake disposal cell ......................................... 88<br />

Figure 25. Regional geologic map of northwestern New Mexico ................................................ 98<br />

Figure 26. Regional structural features in the vicinity of the <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> permit area ............... 99<br />

Figure 27. Geologic map of the <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> permit area .......................................................... 101<br />

Figure 28. Typical stratigraphic section of the Morrison Formation ......................................... 103<br />

DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest Service xvii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!