13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

groundwater resources in the Cibola National Forest beyond those caused by actions other than<br />

the RHR mine. There would be certain cumulative impacts to groundwater arising from actions<br />

other than the <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, as discussed subsequently.<br />

Alternative 2<br />

The primary impact to groundwater identified during scoping is drawdown from pumping of<br />

groundwater to allow shaft construction and mining of ore and subsequent recovery of<br />

groundwater levels after mining ceases. Specific impacts of concern include effects of pumping<br />

on offsite wells and springs and changes to water chemistry. Other sources of impacts to<br />

groundwater are related to backfill of mine workings and discharges from surface facilities and<br />

operations.<br />

<strong>Impact</strong>s of Groundwater Pumping and Recovery<br />

As described in chapter 2, dewatering would be by wells and by underground collection systems,<br />

to an estimated maximum rate of 4,500 gpm (about 10 cfs) from all sources. In assessing impacts<br />

from dewatering, the Forest Service has coordinated with the New Mexico Office of the State<br />

Engineer (NMOSE). RHR has submitted an application to NMOSE <strong>for</strong> a temporary permit that<br />

seeks authorization <strong>for</strong> pumping that is equivalent to that considered in this EIS. The State<br />

permitting process involves considerable technical review by the NMOSE; any State approval<br />

would be expected to require mitigation of effects judged significant by NMOSE. The application<br />

has been protested by Acoma Pueblo. As currently scheduled, the State process would not be<br />

expected to produce a final decision until 2014.<br />

Overview of RHR Groundwater Model<br />

To predict dewatering impacts <strong>for</strong> both the Forest Service and OSE, and <strong>for</strong> its own planning,<br />

RHR developed a groundwater model (Intera, 2011). Forest Service and NMOSE personnel,<br />

along with the EIS consultants, reviewed this model and provided comments to RHR. These<br />

comments led to substantive revisions of the model, as <strong>for</strong> example the addition of an explicit<br />

representation of Horace Springs. The most recent version of the model is Intera (2012). The<br />

following attributes indicate the nature of the model and its ability to predict impacts:<br />

• The model uses a framework <strong>for</strong> the San Juan Basin developed by the USGS (Kernodle,<br />

1996) with many modifications and incorporation of more recent data. It uses the<br />

MODFLOW-SURFACT, a variation of the established MODFLOW computer code.<br />

• Figure 42 is a map of the model area showing the model domain (area covered) and grid.<br />

The model domain extends from the Rio San José on the south to beyond the San Juan<br />

River and into Colorado in the north, a total of 37,000 square miles. The grid has<br />

variable spacing with a maximum of 30,000 feet to a side and in the mine area, cells<br />

which are 330 feet on a side.<br />

• The model is three-dimensional, with 10 layers that represent geologic units from the<br />

Westwater Canyon Member of the Morrison Formation at the bottom, upward to the San<br />

Jose Formation. Table 16 identifies the layers and lists hydraulic conductivies (“Ks”)<br />

used in the model. The horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity ratios vary from 1 to<br />

1,000. In the area of the mine, the hydrologic unit containing the Menefee Formation is<br />

the shallowest unit represented, and most of the thickness is in layers 5 and 7. Layer<br />

elevations are specified in the model based on the best available stratigraphic data.<br />

160 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!