13.08.2013 Views

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Roca Honda Mine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Langman et al. (2012) provide considerable in<strong>for</strong>mation on the springs of the Upper San Mateo<br />

Creek basin. Among the findings of this report are to identify geologic conditions which isolate<br />

the springs and seeps from deep <strong>for</strong>mations such as the Westwater.<br />

Four springs have been identified within the Upper San Mateo Creek subwatershed within 2 miles<br />

of the permit area (table 8), although no springs are present within the permit area. NMEI (1974)<br />

provided in<strong>for</strong>mation on Bridge Spring, which discharges from the Point Lookout Sandstone near<br />

its contact with the Menefee, and North Bridge Spring and South Bridge Spring, which discharge<br />

from the Menefee Formation. In 2009, RHR field investigators walked the central channel of San<br />

Mateo Creek along the reach into which these springs discharged. They located Bridge Spring<br />

and also another spring at the point where NM 605 crosses San Mateo Creek in the south central<br />

part of Section 21, T13N R8W (in<strong>for</strong>mally referred to as “605 spring”). South Bridge Spring and<br />

North Bridge Spring are off-channel springs that were not observed during the RHR investigation<br />

of the channel. Bridge Spring is the closest spring to the RHR permit area.<br />

Table 8 is a summary of the water chemistry data from the five of the springs within 5 miles of<br />

the permit area, two associated with the high elevation volcanics and three low elevation springs<br />

associated with the sandstones near the permit area. In addition to data from the NMEI study,<br />

RHR sampled Bridge Spring once; it was dry on all other occasions. RHR sampled 605 Spring<br />

twice, but the analytical results may be impacted by trash and debris present at the spring.<br />

Table 8. Water chemistry of spring samples<br />

Constituent Units<br />

El Rito<br />

Spring 1<br />

La<br />

Mosca<br />

Spring<br />

(a) 1<br />

La<br />

Mosca<br />

Spring<br />

(b) 1<br />

Bridge<br />

1, 2<br />

Spring<br />

South<br />

Bridge<br />

Spring 1<br />

605 Spring 2<br />

pH 7.35 7.75 7.55 7.92 8.15 8.86–9.22<br />

Specific<br />

conductance<br />

μmhos 155 197 156 969 1,252 1,149–1,800<br />

Temperature °C 13.2 11.0 12.5 20.2 40.3–52.9<br />

Calcium mg/L 16.8 20.9 14.3 44.4 22.9 43<br />

Magnesium mg/L 4.5 4.6 2.4 23.9 22 12–20<br />

Potassium mg/L 4.1 5.0 3.2 5.0 6.9 6–8<br />

Sodium mg/L 8.3 14.0 14.0 168.0 268.0 –<br />

Chloride mg/L 6.0 8.0 8.0 33.0 40.0 66–160<br />

Sulfate mg/L 6.5 6.8 4.5 17.8 19.5 183–207<br />

Nitrogen mg/L 0.23 0.16 0.75 0.31 0.30 Not Detected<br />

Bicarbonate mg/L 90.3 117.1 73.2 608.0 749.0 419–587<br />

Total dissolved<br />

solids<br />

mg/L 213.7 267.6 208.6 940.5 940.5 882–1,170<br />

1 2<br />

From NMEI, 1974; From RHR Baseline Data Report, 2011<br />

140 DEIS <strong>for</strong> <strong>Roca</strong> <strong>Honda</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Cibola National Forest

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!