13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />

Late Succession<br />

Total acres of late succession are expected to be reduced in this alternative due to MPB<br />

caused mortality. Approximately ten acres of late succession (SS5) are projected to<br />

remain within the project area at year 2018 (Allen 2011). The remaining SS4A and SS4B<br />

stands could eventually grow into SS5; however this would take several decades or<br />

longer to achieve. With the current MPB infestation it is highly likely that the<br />

development of SS5 would be delayed due to an increase in MPB caused tree mortality.<br />

Hardwoods<br />

Aspen would benefit from the mountain pine beetle-caused mortality of overstory<br />

ponderosa pine, which decreases competition for sunlight and nutrients. However,<br />

ponderosa pine less than 3” dbh would escape mortality and remain to compete with<br />

quaking aspen. The pine would eventually shade out the aspen within the subsequent 50<br />

years. Increased sunlight warming the ground would immediately stimulate aspen<br />

regeneration through root suckering, expanding existing clones outward a distance up to<br />

1 to 1.5 tree heights (Shepperd & Battaglia 2002). The flush of new aspen suckers<br />

increases browsing damage, however, the large amount of ponderosa pine snags falling<br />

down mitigate the browsing pressure by physically blocking deer and elk from the<br />

suckers. This alternative would move toward Forest Objective 201.<br />

Spruce<br />

This alternative would not have any direct effects on spruce. Indirectly spruce may<br />

increase in time due to dense canopy conditions (stands not affected by MPB) and fire<br />

suppression. Dense mixed conifer stands would likely lose the ponderosa pine<br />

component to MPB caused mortality. The loss of ponderosa pine could affect the<br />

structure of spruce stands by increasing wind-throw (spruce are highly susceptible to<br />

wind throw), coarse woody debris, and subsequent ladder fuels. .<br />

Meadows<br />

Meadow sites in the project area would continue to experience encroachment from<br />

ponderosa pine. The ponderosa pine encroaching on meadow sites is either not large<br />

enough or dense enough to experience heavy mountain pine beetle-caused mortality.<br />

Meadows are not expected to increase as their extent is limited by soil characteristics.<br />

This alternative would not impact achievement of Objective 205.<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Cover Types<br />

The proposed action includes 126 acres of hardwood conversion. These stands were<br />

identified as past aspen sites which had been encroached by pine over time.<br />

This treatment would result in an increase of 126 acres in aspen and a corresponding<br />

decrease in ponderosa pine cover types. No other changes to cover types are anticipated<br />

in the proposed action.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!