13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />

Short Term Uses and Long Term Productivity<br />

NEPA requires consideration of “the relationship between short-term uses of man’s<br />

environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity” (40 CFR<br />

1502.16). As declared by Congress, this includes using all practicable means and<br />

measures, including financial and technical assistance, in a manner calculated to foster<br />

and promote the general welfare, to create and maintain conditions under which man and<br />

nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other<br />

requirements of present and future generations of Americans (NEPA, Section 101).<br />

Please refer to the Silviculture and Soils sections in Chapter 3 for discussions related to<br />

short-term uses and long-term productivity. The proposed actions in this project include<br />

design criteria (see Appendix B) to protect soil productivity. These short-term actions<br />

would generally not damage or diminish long-term resource productivity.<br />

As provided for by the Forest Plan, minimum management requirements guide<br />

implementation of the action alternative. Adherence to these requirements ensures that<br />

long-term productivity of the land is not impaired by short-term uses. Monitoring<br />

specified in this EIS and the Forest Plan validates that the management requirements and<br />

mitigation are effective in protecting long-term productivity.<br />

Unavoidable Adverse Effects<br />

The following is a description of adverse effects that are unavoidable with<br />

implementation of the action alternative. For further discussion of the effects on the<br />

resources listed below, see Chapter 3 under the respective resource topics.<br />

Forest Insect and Disease – will continue in the project area, at epidemic levels in some<br />

areas, and endemic levels in others.<br />

Wildlife Habitat – for certain species may be adversely affected to varying levels with<br />

implementation of the action alternatives. The Wildlife section of this EIS discloses<br />

those effects.<br />

Air Quality – may be adversely affected on a temporary/seasonal basis as a result of<br />

planned prescribed burning and dust from roads and activities.<br />

Scenic Quality – may be affected adversely for some observers by the various levels of<br />

vegetation treatment and other actions planned.<br />

Fire/Fuels Hazard – may be increased during the short-term in some areas as result of<br />

slash created from vegetation treatment. With disposal treatment this hazard will be<br />

reduced. There exists a higher long-term potential for large-scale wildfire under<br />

Alternative 1 versus Alternative 2.<br />

Soils – can be eroded wherever vegetation and soils are disturbed. Compaction can occur<br />

where vehicles and equipment are used.<br />

Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources<br />

Irreversible commitments of resources are those that cannot be regained, such as the<br />

extinction of a species or the removal of mined ore. Irretrievable commitments are those<br />

that are lost for a period of time such as a temporary loss of timber productivity in<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!