13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />

Table 50. HUC 12 Watershed within the Vestal Project Area<br />

HUC 12<br />

Watershed % of Watershed<br />

Number Watershed Name<br />

Acres in the VPA<br />

101201090201 Upper Beaver Creek 22,753 1%<br />

101201090601 Ruby Creek-French Creek 29,291 64%<br />

101201090602 Stockade Lakes-French Creek 19,926 74%<br />

101201090603 Glen Erin Creek-French Creek 17,419 28%<br />

101201090804 Upper Grace Coolidge Creek 19,639 2%<br />

101201090901 Headwaters Spring Creek 23,108 4%<br />

101201090903 Newton Fork-Spring Creek 24,423 15%<br />

(USDA NRCS 2009)<br />

In 2011Watershed Condition Framework (WCF) (USDA Forest Service 2011a) was<br />

implemented by the Forest Service. It is a comprehensive approach for classifying<br />

watershed condition, proactively implementing integrated restoration in priority<br />

watersheds on national forests and grasslands, and tracking and monitoring outcomebased<br />

program accomplishments for performance accountability.<br />

Watershed condition is the state of the physical and biological characteristics and<br />

processes within a watershed that affect the soil and hydrologic functions supporting<br />

aquatic ecosystems. There are four (4) watersheds that have a substantial portion of their<br />

area within the Vestal project area, Ruby Creek-French Creek, Stockade Lakes-French<br />

Creek, Glen Erin Creek-French Creek and Newton Fork-Spring Creek. All are rated<br />

Class 2 watersheds, “Functioning at Risk”.<br />

Watershed condition classification is the process of describing watershed condition in<br />

terms of discrete categories (or classes) that reflect the level of watershed health or<br />

integrity. The three watershed condition classes that are directly related to the degree or<br />

level of watershed functionality or integrity;<br />

156<br />

Class 1 = Functioning Properly – exhibit high geomorphic, hydrologic, and biotic<br />

integrity relative to their natural potential condition.<br />

• Riparian/wetland areas that are functioning properly exist when adequate<br />

vegetation, landform, or large woody debris is present to dissipate stream<br />

energy associated with high waterflow, thereby reducing erosion, improving<br />

water quality, etc.<br />

Class 2 = Functioning at Risk – exhibit moderate geomorphic, hydrologic, and<br />

biotic integrity relative to their natural potential condition.<br />

• Riparian/wetland areas that are in functional condition, but one or more<br />

existing soil, water, or vegetation attributes makes them susceptible to<br />

degradation.<br />

Class 3 = Impaired Function – exhibit low geomorphic, hydrologic, and biotic<br />

integrity relative to their natural potential condition.<br />

• Riparian/wetland areas that clearly are not providing adequate vegetation,<br />

landform, or large woody debris to dissipate stream energy associated with<br />

high flows, and thus are not reducing erosion, improving water quality, etc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!