13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />

Noxious weed infestations are expected to increase under both alternatives. Commercial<br />

and non-commercial timber harvest activities, on both Forest Service and on adjacent<br />

private lands, often provide mechanisms for the introduction, establishment, and spread<br />

of noxious weeds. Anywhere there has been some form of soil disturbance, the potential<br />

for the establishment of noxious weeds exists. The potential for noxious weed<br />

establishment is even greater in disturbed areas adjacent to existing weed populations.<br />

The movement of vehicles, equipment, and other motorized vehicles in and out of these<br />

areas also facilitates weed establishment. Roads create a network of corridors through<br />

which seed dispersal can occur.<br />

Roads and trails would continue to be avenues for spread of noxious weeds. Off highway<br />

use of vehicles on roads and trails would continue to promote the spread of noxious<br />

weeds by providing a means of transport. Seeds can collect in wheel-wells and grills of<br />

off-highway vehicles and may be dispersed as they travel. In areas where bare soil is<br />

exposed or natural vegetation is diminished, opportunities exist for the establishment of<br />

new infestations.<br />

The grazing in the Vestal project area would continue as identified in the Allotment<br />

Management Plans for the grazing allotments within the project area. Under the action<br />

alternative, creation of transitory range would have a positive cumulative effect on those<br />

allotments by reducing the time livestock spend in preferred areas. Broadcast burning<br />

proposed under the action alternative would work against the cumulative effect of fire<br />

suppression by killing small trees and setting back succession, though it is expected to<br />

have limited effects on overstory canopy. All of the effects to rangeland resources<br />

presented here would be limited in intensity and duration. Any negative impacts would<br />

be minimal and are directly related to livestock management in the short term as they are<br />

impacted by treatment activities.<br />

All of the above uses are limited in intensity and duration and therefore when combined<br />

with the alternatives analyzed, including the No Action alternative, do not result in<br />

adverse cumulative impacts to the rare plant species or their habitat, the range resource or<br />

noxious weeds.<br />

Minerals and Geologic Resources<br />

Affected Environment<br />

The potential for development of mineral commodities within the project area is<br />

moderate to high. Specifically, potential exists for development of salable mica and<br />

feldspar resources from numerous schist units and pegmatites, and for locatable gold in<br />

placer deposits. Carbonates are not widespread in the project area; consequently, cave or<br />

karst resources have not been identified. Invertebrate and vertebrate fossils are unlikely<br />

to be present within project area.<br />

<strong>Environmental</strong> Consequences<br />

Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects for All Alternatives<br />

Existing transportation conditions within the project area are adequate to facilitate<br />

activities related to exploration and development for either salable or locatable minerals.<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!